Voting for our childrens future

PRENOTE: My personal views on this issue are at the end of the post.  See “Personal View”.

Previous posts this week, here and here.  There will be a few on other topics in coming days.  Check back.

Aug. 9, 2022

Tuesday Aug 9, 2022, was Minnesota’s Primary Election.  I voted at about 7:30 a.m. and I was very impressed with the general organization and tenor at the site.

I always vote, in every election.  I’m accustomed to a positive experience, without exception, in past elections.

I wore my “I Voted” sticker all day and it was noticed, positively, several times.

Later that morning, I had coffee with a friend who had not yet voted in her community.  I asked if she would comment back on her reactions .  She didn’t know my impressions.  Later in the afternoon came her e-mail:

“All the poll workers greeted me.  I was surprised to be asked to read and sign an acknowledgement that I was not a felon, or something like that — I wish I could remember what it said.  I don’t remember that from years past.
I voted and thanked everyone for working the polls.  It was a very cordial atmosphere.  I put my red “I Voted” sticker on my car’s visor.  It is always in the down position so is visible when anyone looks at my car!”
I, too, had noted the “acknowledgment” form: “The acknowledgement is, I suppose, directed to the ’stop the steal’ folks.  A waste of paper, but I understand it.”

For this particular election and this post I decided to focus on the single non-candidate issue on the ballot: a major school referendum in my school district.  (In the Minnesota primary, the ballot is partisan – you can only vote the column for your party preferences.  The school election was separate, non-partisan, and open to all voters.)

FACTS:

According to the school district website: “The population of the district is approximately 98,100 people, including the more than 18,400 students who attend district schools.”  There are three high schools.  There  is an unknown number of home and parochial school population in the district.

Here are the results of the Referendum , linked in the school district report post-election:
70, 429  was the potential # of Eligible Voters (100%)
   7,782  Voted Yes
 14,834  Voted N0
47,813  did not Vote (68%)

What this means is very significant, about “we, the people”.

Of most concern to me, but typical of past non-presidential-year elections, was the low voter turnout.  Minnesota is very friendly to voters and voting.  There are few impediments to voting.  August 9 in my town was a perfect weather day.

But unless you voted, you have no say in outcomes.

There is little for winners to celebrate.  Those who won got about 20% of the eligible votes.  Two-thirds of those eligible to vote didn’t vote at all.  Where were they?

The need articulated by the proposal doesn’t end on August 9.  The costs will increase when the same changes come up again.

*
Below is essentially the only communication about this issue on the street or in my mailbox before I voted.  There were a few “Vote Yes” signs, but they were few in comparison.  School districts as public entities aren’t supposed to campaign for the issue, even though it would make sense that our public officials who made the decision for referendum could speak out publicly in favor of it.

lawn sign against the school district referendum request

For several months, the School District had a complete description of the issue on its website, and on request I received a 4-page pamphlet describing the issue.  I had earlier publicized it to this list, and it is here: 833 Referendum 2022.  I had no reason to ask more questions, though I’m sure I could have.
This was the extent of the public information citizens had about this important election.

A “Vote No” mailer opposing the referendum came to us by mail at 6 p.m., August 9, 10 hours after I had voted.  Here it is: ISD833 referendum mailer 2022.  I doubt it would change many minds.  Demands, particularly without even suggested solutions, and being against, are not very positive techniques.

Elections do have future consequences.  Vote well informed.


POSTNOTE: For those with an interest, here is the data of all MN Primary Election results August 9, 2022:

PERSONAL VIEW: The referendum issue has been public information since  February, 2022.  On April 21, 2022, the School Board, in a 6-1 vote, approved the plan, which went to vote on August 9, 2022.  There was very public information at every step in the process.

As noted above, the community rejected the proposal, mostly, I believe, by not even bothering to vote when the opportunity was available.

There is the famous saying, made famous by Pogo, “We have met the enemy, and they are us.”

It is easiest to look for culprits, who are never, it seems, ourselves.

The biggest dilemma of democracy is its greatest gift: the right of people to vote.

The anti-referendum folks really did not win anything at all; everybody lost.

The school district is under strict rules when it comes to school elections: it can release the facts, but it cannot take sides.  It followed its rules in this case, with a great plenty of sunlight.

The anti- forces were not under such constraints.  All they had to say in their own networks was “vote no”.

The issue was non-partisan, so it was off-limits to use party designation on campaigning.

Personally, I voted yes, and I requested, received,  and then sent the four page leaflet prepared by the School District to people with an interest in the issue.  Personally, I didn’t know the full details:  that is what elected representatives are for.  All but one (6-1) approved the plan that went to vote on August 9.

Schools will open on schedule in a couple of weeks.  None of the plans voted on were immediate – they were for future needs.

The issue will doubtless come up again.  Who knows what kind of strategizing will happen for next time?

No matter, the issue remains and the beneficiaries or the victims of whatever happens will be the nearly one of five residents of District 833 who are too young to vote.

They deserve better.

Thank you to the 833 School Board, and school district staff, who represent their interests.

*

Coincident with, but totally separate from the instant issue, came a most interesting lengthy article on the battle about public education generally.  For those interested, from Henry Giroux, here.

Molly, who sent the article, sent this note with it:

Hi Friends, This article is about American education K-12, and about the growing movements towards censorship of content, and of elimination of “how to” methods like teaching critical thinking skills.

The article—be warned–is a bit long—ie, needs a better edit job—but is an important, well-documented one (has a ton of references), & I think is worth it.

It scares the socks off of me. That’s partly because I was very very lucky, back in the Stone Age, to have a 2-year English class in high school that very deliberately taught critical thinking skills in our reading & writing…

It  has  been more and more evident to me that these skills are
increasingly lacking in US society, but I did not realize that they
are being consciously omitted/suppressed  in some educational systems…

COMMENTS (more at end):

from Carol: Sorry, but I’m going to disagree with you a bit on this one.  We voted early in-person.  It wasn’t until I downloaded the sample ballot that I actually focused that there was a school referendum.  (Sorry – like everyone, we’ve been a bit busy, not the least of which was battling Covid recently.)  Down in our corner of Woodbury, there were many lawn signs saying vote “No.”  I believed that was due to the district’s threat of closing Newport Elementary.  Now, I don’t know for sure if that is tied to this vote, but people here are not happy with the school district.  I’ve had friends who sent their kids to Newport, and they praised the school highly (one of them being very persnickety about where her kids got their education).

Also, in the past (altho’ you say the school district itself can’t campaign in these situations), I believe that we got mailings and phone calls from SOMEbody, encouraging us to vote “Yes” on a referendum.  This time, crickets.  The wording on the ballot was pretty generic.  I was one of those who voted – but skipped voting on the referendum, as I felt I definitely needed more information.  Now, that’s probably my own fault; on the other hand, we’re pretty aware of what’s going on, and we for sure support education.  So I’m guessing a lot of those who aren’t plugged into the system through their children felt a little blindsided as well.  That “ask” was for a lot of money.  They’ll regroup, and try again.

Response from Dick:  Many thanks for the comment. I hope the Covid has passed by.  There are things we all need to learn from this experience.  I personally started to pay attention to this when I saw the first Vote No signs going up, and, yes, they seemed more common in Newport (I drove over there specifically to see if this was true).   Without those Vote No signs, I would have been less likely to pay attention, though, as you know, at the polling place they called attention to the school district issue on the back.

I don’t follow this all that closely, normally.  In past years I do know that on some occasions there were Citizens Committees, unconnected with the official school network, that did get out the vote (probably similar to the Vote No bunch this time.  I do think that school districts, and perhaps other public entities, are constrained from ‘blowing their own horn’ in advocating for their own issues.  I’m not positive of that, but this election has caused me to look into that aspect further.

There certainly was no lack of easily available information in a timely manner – but one had to seek it out, and ask questions if need be.

 

“The Day After”, the day after.

PRENOTE: I’ve previously identified the on-line event relating to this with several very interesting remaining segments Aug 10, 17, 24, 31.  Details are here.  Please note especially Aug. 10.  Pre-registration is required for each segment, and early registration is recommended.  This is worth your time.  Take a look at the descriptors and enroll.

*

I watched “The Day After” with several hundred others on Zoom yesterday (Saturday).  It was a wise use of time, as was viewing of Television Event, the story of the making of The Day After, a couple of days earlier.

Both films are easily available on-line.

Joyce recommends also, another 1983 film, Testament, which she found even “more engaging and moving”.  I haven’t watched that yet, but will.

Each of the films deal with the horrors of the reality of nuclear war.  One line of script in The Day After stood out for me: “We knew about this for 40 years”,  a character says, remembering the dawn of the nuclear age during WWII.

I was watching the film near40 years after it had been released in 1983.

Afterwards I looked up a source that I trust on data, Nuclear Threat Initiativeand noted how little we appear to have learned in the long history of the Bomb.

Re the films, I won’t review here what can easily be viewed by anyone, anytime, anywhere.  The films are well worth your time, your thought, and your personal action, wherever you live.

Whose fault was it, is it, and will be?  This slavish devotion to the  sacred Bomb, and other things, that can destroy us.

My choice is “we, the people”.  We have many excuses for our inaction.

I have noted for a long time that a near mandatory requirement for a candidate for U.S. President is to be engaged in, at minimum, at least the threat of war against an ‘enemy’.  Political strategists know this.

A whole succession of Presidents were dragged into the near endless quagmire of Vietnam; then came the continuing quagmire of the Middle East; most recently has been the war against ourselves, neighbor to neighbor, most represented by the  aftermath 2016 election and literally the many years run-up to that election.

And now we have very active saber rattling by the U.S. and Russia (Ukraine), and China and the U.S. (Taiwan)…on and on it goes.

It isn’t quite as simple as just disarming and not doing war anymore.  We can’t just walk away from Ukraine – oh, we can, but it would be disastrous for more than the Ukrainians.  But that’s another topic.

Another line in The Day After was the famous quote attributed to Albert Einstein about nuclear: “I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”    I’m linking an analysis. about the specifics of the quotation itself, but there is no doubt in my mind that it was Einstein’s deep concern, whatever his specific words might have been, when or to whom, that he believed we were playing with the very future of all of us, if we play around with nuclear weapons.  And we’re far from having learned our lesson as a people.

POSTNOTE:  I wondered why I had never heard of “The Night After” before learning of it through the Zoom series earlier referenced.  It came clear when I learned that its airing on ABC was November 20, 1983.

Nov. 20, 1983, I was about two months into my personal ‘resurrection’ year – I say this almost literally.  I was in a new community and new job where I knew almost no one.  I was just beginning to dig myself out of a deep hole from two previous years that I will always describe as both the worst and best years of my life.

I do think that 1981-83 also represented an opening for programming such as the films referenced above.  I share one piece of evidence from my own life – my holiday card prepared around Thanksgiving time, 1982.  You can read it here, and it fleshes out, a bit, about where I saw our country at that point in time:  Nuclear War.

Now, 40 years later, we’re in very different times.  I have hope that the flame for peace and justice has not gone out.  And in bits and pieces we can all keep it alive.

 

 

The Bomb…

77 years ago today, the horror of the Atomic Bomb was unleashed over Hiroshima, Japan.  Three days later, the act was repeated at Nagasaki.

The debate will never end.  The act must never be forgotten, or repeated.

Here are two remembrances about the bomb, and the folly and the myth of war itself.

First, a column I wrote which was published in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, August 6, 2005: Atomic Bomb 1945001.

Second, the below column by my long-time friend Peter Barus in OpEdNews in July 18, 2020. reprinted with permission of the author.

(Today’s rendition of the Peace Boat, the Golden Rule, sets sail down the Mississippi River, beginning at Stillwater MN on September 2, 2022.  Details, including changes, will be reported here as they are known.  Here is a description of  the 2022 Golden Rule Project.  More can also be read here, starting at “Three.”)

Vietnam War Protest ca 1968 Philadelphia PA, the Golden Rule photo from Peter Barus, whose Dad  is pictured in the boat.

Peter Barus: My father, a founding Vet for Peace, had served on the battleship Indiana in War Two, and years later was photographed with two members of the Philadelphia Orchestra in a tiny sailboat, tacking across the bows of another battleship being recommissioned in the Philadelphia Navy Yard, with STOP THE WAR IN VIETNAM emblazoned on the sail in electrical tape. There was precedent for this.
Some informal historical background…
“Golden Rule” was, and is again, a small two-masted sailboat that was sailed by Albert Bigelow and George Willoughby into the Atomic Test Zone to stop the atomic bomb testing in the Pacific that contaminated the Marshall Islands. They were repeatedly towed ashore by the Coast Guard, and were not vaporized. But they did raise public awareness of this awful crime against humanity, the Earth, and life itself.
That was in 1958, and at the age of ten, I went down to Fort Detrick, MD, for my first peace vigil. I believe I met “Golden Rule’s” crew there. We were all excited about Golden Rule. Albert and George had just returned from being jailed again. George was part of our Meeting, I think. Margaret Rawson, another Quaker activist, was there, and her husband was the head of the biological weapons lab inside the fort, which was the object of our protest. That afternoon Margaret’s husband was visited by the military commander of the fort, who said there was a crowd of “Communists” at the gate, and offered an escort home. “No,” he replied, “My wife is out there with them, they’ll be coming to our house for dinner, would you like to join us?”

At the time, the US Government was not only irradiating inhabited Pacific islands, and spreading plutonium across the landscape in the Southwest, but injecting it into indigent patients in a hospital in Cincinnati to see what would happen to them. They died horribly of course. But “indigents” is one of those words that means “not White,” so this was not considered newsworthy. In the late eighties a friend of mine had been a lawyer for the above-mentioned islanders, so shamefully treated by our government after being intentionally deluged with fallout in the tests the Golden Rule had been trying to stop. To this day they are still suffering the effects of that terrible crime, and have only recently been allowed or forced to accept a few hundred dollars and return to their original home island, with its glowing beaches. The islanders and the “indigent” patients had all been the unwitting subjects of a horrific experiment, the effects of which were already well understood in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to be a hideous variety of unbearable ways to die. I was told that in the Cincinnati case, by a court order, a commemorative plaque was installed in a boiler room of the hospital.
The following, sent this week by the Vets for Peace Golden Rule Project, is all the more poignant to me in light of these memories…

“Seventy-five years ago today – July 16, 1945, the United States detonated the first atomic bomb, which was named “Trinity,” in New Mexico. In less than one month’s time, the first three nuclear weapons had blasted the planet, unleashing a destructive force with consequences that will linger for thousands of years.
This issue of the Golden Rule eNews is devoted to remembering those horrible events and to educating ourselves about the continuing impact U.S. militarism in the Pacific, with particular focus on Hawaii.
The Golden Rule peace boat is currently in Honolulu, sheltering-in-place until Covid-19 restrictions can be safely lifted in the Marshall Islands and throughout the Pacific. In the meantime, we remain committed to our mission to rid the world of nuclear weapons and to sail for a peaceful, sustainable future.
Seventy Five Years Ago – July 16, 1945 The Atomic Era Began with the Trinity Test in Alamagordo, New Mexico. It Changed the World Forever.
Both the yield (21 kilotons) and the fallout exceeded expectations of the scientists by far. Wind carried the fallout over a hundred miles and rolls of film as far away as Indiana was ruined. “If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the mighty one. Now I am become Death, destroyer of worlds.”, said Robert Oppenheimer afterwards. Survivors and their descendants are still trying to get health care and compensation. Downwinders of that blast are still trying to get health care and compensation for the injuries to themselves and their descendants.
Because ten of the thirteen pounds of plutonium did not fission but were drawn seven miles into the stratosphere and rained back down on the planet, a huge area of the Southwest will be contaminated for 240,000 years with the most toxic poison known to man.
Just 3 weeks later, On August 6, Hiroshima, Japan was destroyed and 180,000 civilians died by the end of the year.
In five square miles of the city, 92% of the buildings were destroyed or damaged by the blast and fires.
On August 9, Nagasaki was bombed, with over 80,000 killed.
Tens of thousands died instantaneously and others died slowly and agonizingly as a result of burns and radiation. Survivors are still susceptible to leukemia, tumors, and post-traumatic stress. But the damage didn’t stop there – children and grandchildren of survivors had increased chances of small brain sizes, delayed development, blindness and increased susceptibility to leukemia and other cancers.
Atomic bomb survivors have worked hard all of their lives to assure that NEVER AGAIN will nuclear weapons be used!
Truman’s diary confirms that he knew Japan was trying desperately to get out of the war by opening a negotiating channel through Moscow.”

The salvaged and refurbished ship is in Hawaii, pinned there by The Virus on the road to Hiroshima. But the plucky little craft continues her voyage.
The list of outrages we now know about has grown in seventy-five years, and there are a lot of dots to connect. The persistent and rising resistance movement now includes and involves millions of people that Capitalism left in its toxic dust. It isn’t so much a movement as a kind of social sea-level rise, from the relentless heat of state repression. A system that can never provide either equity or environmental balance has defended the indefensible for too long.
But there’s a difference now. The surveillance is even more widespread, because it is in private hands, and therefore not constrained to secrecy so much as entitled to it. A Snowden inside The Book of Fe, um, Faces, for instance, might get sued, but wouldn’t have to leave the country for fear of being executed under some ancient sedition law or other. And the government can still get hold of your dossier the old fashioned way: buy it on the open market, like anybody else.
Except they no longer care about you. They’ve figured out that you are subject to currents and trends that are much more easily managed by software. You are just a data-point. It isn’t your opinion that matters, it’s where your gaze is pointed, that makes the big money now. And the big money decides.
There’s a new solidarity among people who are not in denial about what’s at stake for humanity. Old demographics have lost their meaning (which may explain why “targeted” advertising is losing so much money). It’s not the big names, Antifa or BLM or LGBTQ+ or “woke.” It’s much bigger than those great efforts combined. It’s simply people who don’t have a stake in “normal”. But it’s not that first wave of stake-non-holders, so clueless and terrified they flocked to a bloodthirsty psychopath. These folks watch and learn. They know the difference between shite and shinola. They know that money could be found to pay everyone in America to stay home until The Virus settles down, and build more homes for the people who don’t have one, and hand out enough PPE for everybody to change them often. Read up on this in Stephanie Kelton’s new book, “The Deficit Myth.” The banks and hedge funds just got trillions and what are they doing with all that loot? Sitting on it. Read all about that in “Levers of Power.” Kevin Young has just explained to us all how History Shows Disruptive Protest Works, where neither violence nor electoral politics can. And it’s just fighting fire with fire, as long as you identify the fire accurately: money is the fire, not the SWAT teams. They have to get paid to repress people. That means the people they repress have to spend money. And while you’re at it, look up Veterans for Peace, and see what you can do to help.
Just for starters.

The Day After….

This post publicizes three distinct but directly related events in the next month and a half.  #1 and #2 are in progress now.  #3 is in September.

My July 29 post began with the below note, specifically related to #1, below:

PRE-NOTE to everyone:  August 6 and 9 are the 77th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  There is a significant on-line event relating to this with segments Aug 3, 6, 10, 17, 24, 31.  Details are here.  Pre-registration is required for each segment, and early registration is recommended.  This is worth your time.

One.

Tomorrow is August 6, and on August 3, I watched the film advertised for August 3 (in the earlier link, above).

This film, “Television Event”, 90 minutes and released in 2020, is detailed here.   The film is a retrospective on what was the then-most watched U.S. television special to that date in November, 1983.  It is easily accessible on-line.

On November 20, 1983, the event recalled in Television Event was a total evening special on ABC, most of which was a showing of the film “The Day After”, about the consequences of nuclear war, to be shown on line on Saturday, Aug. 6 (see above link, RSVP required).

Television Event is absolutely engrossing…a look at history as well as an opportunity on what it means in this time in history, 50 years later.  I highly recommend it.  Melanie, who’s been organizing these activities, commented: “I am looking forward to seeing “The Day After” .  I was too scared before (I don’t like violent movies) but after seeing Television Event I know I can do it.  Plus I have skimmed through it and know the ending so that will help.

Watching Television Event is a suggested prequel to the followup events, detailed at the above link.  The events at the other dates may interest you as well.  Each event asks pre-registration.  

There’s the noted saying: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

We all have a personal role to play in the future of our planet, and the films and the later discussion is great food for thought.

*

*

Two.

This weekend are  related upcoming events: Hiroshima-Nagasaki annual commemoration in Minneapolis, detail here: HiroshimaNagasaki_2022vs2

*

*

Three.

Golden Rule begins its tour of the central and eastern U.S. Sep 2-27 in Twin Cities area.  Please read on  and watchful future information.

The Golden Rule 2022

Local Sponsor Veterans for Peace #27

From 1946 to 1958 the U.S. dropped 67 nuclear bombs in the Marshall Islands, displacing the indigenous inhabitants and spreading radiation around the globe. The concerned public unsuccessfully tried to stop the nuclear weapons testing.

In 1958 four Quaker peace activists sailed the Golden Rule toward the Marshall Islands attempting to halt nuclear weapons testing. The US Coast Guard boarded her in Honolulu and arrested her crew, causing an international outcry.

The arrests sparked worldwide awareness of the dangers of radiation, which was being found in mother’s milk. In 1963, President Kennedy, along with leaders of the UK and the USSR, signed the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, banning nuclear testing in air, water, or space, but allowing it underground.

In 2010 Golden Rule was found as a sunken, derelict wreck in northern California’s Humboldt Bay. Over five years, she was lovingly restored by members of Veterans For Peace, Quakers and wooden boat lovers. 

The Golden Rule again sails for a nuclear-free world and a peaceful, sustainable future.

During 2015 – 2022 the Golden Rule sailed the West Coast between British Columbia and San Diego and to Hawai’i and back.  The Golden Rule Project has given hundreds of educational presentations about nuclear issues and led many peace flotillas.

From Sept 2022 through Dec 2023 the Golden Rule will sail “The Great Loop.” Launching on the St. Croix River she will sail down the entire Mississippi River, along the Gulf states, up the east coast to Maine, through the Hudson River and Erie Canal, around the Great Lakes, and down the center of the country back to the Gulf of Mexico.

This 15-month voyage will take the Golden Rule into 100 towns and cities and cover 11,000 miles. Her first stops are Stillwater, Hudson, Prescott and Hastings from Sept. 2 – 19.  She will then sail to St. Paul and Minneapolis (Sept. 19 – 27) before continuing to Redwing and points downstream.

Along the way, Golden Rule representatives will speak to many groups about how their actions can bring about nuclear disarmament and stop the possibility of nuclear war.  In this time of war, bringing hope through action is a great antidote to the fearful messages that governments and media spread.  Golden Rule events also highlight local environmental, climate change and peace & justice issues by giving others a chance to speak and connecting their issues to the need to stop all war.

Great Loop Volunteers Needed With your help, the Golden Rule can visit 28 large cities and 68 small towns bringing awareness of nuclear issues to thousands of people.

Organize an event! Are you a member of a peace, justice, environmental, climate change, civic club or political action group? Are you a member of a church? Are you a student or teacher?

You can welcome the Golden Rule to your town, host a panel presentation, have a potluck, a gala dinner fundraiser, or a community peace party.  Plant a peace pole!

Volunteer in other ways!  Please let us know how you can help. We need crew hosts, musicians, authors, speakers, social media posters, and more.
Please contact Project Manager Helen Jaccard at 206-992-6364 / vfpgoldenruleproject@gmail.com for information on organizing an event for your group.
 
Thank you!   Emoji  Mary McNellis, VFP Chapter 27
*
COMMENTS:
from Joyce, to #1: I remember watching the Day After. A film I found much more engaging and moving was this one: Testament.

Politics: Where I Stand.

Companion post, Voters, here.

I am,  and you and every else are, “politics”.  The “them” we like to despise, really is US, period.

Two years ago, August 1 and  2, 2020, I did two posts on successive days about U.S. politics, and where I stood and why.

The two posts remain unchanged and pertinent, and I re-present them, unedited here: D’s, and T’s.

Like then, I welcome comments here.

It is not new news that I’m a committed Democrat, and basically have always been.  But, the person I call my political mentor was a progressive Republican; and, earlier, “I like[d] Ike”, etc.  This is no contradiction in terms.  These kinds of Republicans have been purged from what goes by “Republican” today.

*

Two years ago, like almost everyone, I was caught unaware about the pending and escalating insanity following Election Day, won by over 7-million votes by Joe Biden – a margin which didn’t surprise me at all.

With all of us, I watched storm clouds gather, which I erroneously thought crested and ended with January 6, 2021, but which continue to this day.  And the crisis was hatched long before Election Day 2020.

In my lifetime, I have never seen anything like the time between Nov. 2020 and today.  In our country’s lifetime, except for the Civil War, there has been nothing like this: craziness unchained: ur democracy on the edge of destruction.

There is no longer a “Republican Party” as commonly understood particularly in recent times; the name has been stolen and it’s reputation sullied perhaps beyond redemption.  It can recover, but this will take many years of very hard work.

Today’s Democrats by and large are like yesterdays progressive Republicans, by and large banished from today’s party.

*

Two years ago I differentiated between today’s two major parties with the distinction “We” vs “Me”.

Democrats – the “We’s – often are portrayed as disorganized, even by Democrats.  I consider that a strength, since the Democrats are a party that embraces and endeavors to respect all voices (which is, after all, the nature of our nation itself).

However imperfectly, Democrats consistently work towards the ideal of Community – a gathering place where all matter, not just some.  Where ‘winning’ is not reserved for the privileged few.  A personal hero, Paul Wellstone, said it best: “we all do better when we all do better.”

The T’s (Me’s) seem most attracted to authority – working to control who makes the rules (Laws) and interprets these laws (Judges).  In their view, there are in’s and out’s “winners” and “losers”.  And they work to control.  In a diverse society this is a dangerous and doomed philosophy.

In these tribal days, the gap is difficult to bridge.  A “me” frames an issue in terms of personal self-interest – what I want.  A “we” starts from a community perspective – how are we, together.

Of course, no definition is absolute, especially when people are involved – look at your own circles – family, friends, associates….  But I think my basic distinction (we v me) is true, and one of the main reasons dialogue is so difficult: “what’s best for all of us” is very different than “what’s best for me”.

As a society, person by person, we need to deal constructively with differences of opinion.  This used to be more common that today.  Now it’s winner or loser.

We are all losing.

*

POSTNOTE:  As this was ‘going to press’, Jeff sent a query relating to the upcoming primary election in Minnesota: “why the primary system exacerbates the pull to the left and the right for candidates” referring to a column by Tom Horner in yesterday’s Minneapolis Star Tribune.

It happens that my primary ballot has numerous contests, for Congress, and other positions, Republican as well as Democrat, as well as a large school district referendum.  If you’re Minnesotan here’s the link to find the info for your area.

My opinion: Probably as long as there have been humans there have been contests for power and control.  Come to think of it, this holds true in the animal kingdom generally.

Elections  are an effort to civilize this conflict.  Even in our system of government, since the foundation, there have been contests, not always polite, at election time.

I was fairly active politically (as a Democrat) for quite a long while.  Generally the candidate endorsement process was through the political party structure beginning at the local level.  Anyone could run, and the conventions would endorse, and ultimately the state party endorsed candidate was on the ballot.

The contest was open and relatively civil.

My first experience with a deviation was in 2010, when Mark Dayton bypassed the regular endorsement process, won the primary, and became two-term Minnesota Governor from 2011-19.

In 2010, I was active in the DFL Senior Caucus, Minnesota Democratic Party.  Internally within our caucus came a controversy: do we go with the endorsed candidate, or support Dayton?  It became a divisive issue.  I favored  staying with the endorsed candidate – respecting the long-standing process.  The non-endorsed candidate, Dayton, won.  (In my opinion he was an outstanding Governor.)

My opinion, the primary process does as Tom Horner suggests.  Fewer folks vote and it’s more susceptible to manipulation by well organized constituent groups.  In my local case, the long-time well-respected Congresswoman, (who I support), is being challenged by a another woman who appears to be from the more progressive wing of the party.  Who’ll win?  Ask me on August 10.  But it’s an important contest.

There is another question on my ballot: an important school bond referendum.  I know the issue, which was advanced by the local school board, and is important.  The details of the issue are here:   833 Referendum 2022.  Public Schools, of course, are public entities for the powerless, and depend on the public for taxation. Over the years I have noticed political manipulation of such issues, particularly how, if at all, they can be publicized and by whom, and when the elections are held.  If you wish to defeat the issue, you don’t allow it at the time when it will most likely be passed.  Mostly the signs I’ve seen (and there aren’t many of them) are “vote no” with absolutely no detail.  I suspect that the “vote yes” group is mobilizing in other ways.  Again ask me on August 10 how it turned out.  Defeat will not get rid of the issues; only the cost will rise as time goes on.

from Norm:  Norm is a long-time active Democrat and we’re good friends.  I had raised this issue with him, and here’s his most recent response.

Julianne J___ [a Democrat friend] and I made a presentation to my local Kiwanis club a few years ago on the political process.
We wanted to make the presentation non-partisan in recognition of the far ranging and various political views of my Kiwanis club colleagues, all mainly retired and many of them nationally and internationally known in their fields of academia, science and medicine.
That is, quite an accomplished and sophisticated group of men and women!
Julianne found and discussed the results of the research that had been done on the development of personal political views. Not surprisingly, the research found that most political views and opinions are formulated by most people before reaching the age of five based upon the views of those around them, that is, primarily their families.*
Further, that those views are unlikely to ever change during their lifetime save for some traumatic life changing event.
Given that, it is interesting to speculate what traumatic event happened to the many people who have chosen to believe little Donnie’s Big Lie and to lose faith in so many pillars of democracy including the Constitution, elections system and its process, truth speaking and truth seeking legislators like Rep. Cheney who will be demolished in her primary for the great work that she has done with the January 6 inquiry, and so on.
What happened to cause such a change?
Was it little Donnie and nothing more?
Was it little Donnie convincing too many people that all of their ills, lack of successes, public policies that they did  not like including LBGTAI rights and so on were all the fault of “those  people?”
Further, was it little Donnie convincing too many folks to forget all about those laws, policies and so on that were victimizing them and to just trust him and that he would take car of them aka Rev. Jones?  That is, drink the Kool-Aide and all will be well.
Coal will once again be in high demand and all miners will have jobs.  Steel will be made again in the US and all of the rusted plants will be brought back to life and jobs will be plentiful.  Climate change is just a hoax by folks trying to make me aka little Donnie, look bad!
Heck, COVID is just another hoax perpetuated by folks wanting to make me aka little Donnie, look bad.  Just gargle some Chlorox and you will be fine!
*Note: one of my Kiwanis colleagues told me after our joint presentation that he was quite sure that Julianne was a Republican so we knew right there and then that we had accomplished our intent to be non-partisan with our presentation!

Linda adds to the conversation:

Nice to read of Norm and Julianne’s presentation to the Kiwanis club.   What a great project.  These projects take a great deal of effort.

At the time DJT was elected in 2106, I spent 3 months preparing a public presentation on “Understanding the Constitution”.  This morphed into the “Trump Administration and the U. S. Constitution”.  It was sponsored by the American Constitution Society.

Meetings were held around the TC and law students, lawyers, some Republicans, and members of the public came.  My focus was what the Trump Admnistration was advocating through the courts and changes to the law, stating the outcome of these changes or rulings, and contrasting them with the preceeding interpretations of the Constitution.

It was interesting to listen to the questions that attendees had.  A few people just sat there and glowered at me.  Many people took notes.  Many people just asked for further information.  A few people wanted to develop these sessions into classroom projects.

I was gratified that the talks were received with interest and not controversy.  I concluded that many people who believed in Trump just do not realize what profound impacts the rule of law and Trump’s prejudices have had on the country.  Many people spend most of their days being entertained, working at a job, and looking for simple answers.

Why do people not believe what experts say?  I think the following events account for it.

  1. The Catholic Church scandal.
  2. Nixon and Watergate (Republicans lied about it)
  3. The War Against Iraq  (Republicans lied about it)
  4. Lack of understanding how health and science professionals make us safe  (Trump lied about them)
  5. Lack of Civics teaching
  6. A history of racism and sexism, that meant white men lost when others had rights.
  7. Vietnam (Democrats and Republicans lied about it)
  8. Politics and churches
  9. Indifference to community values (Republicans)

 

Voters

August 1 is 99 Days to the 2022 Election (Nov. 8).  Every single person is, and has to be, the difference maker in a democratic republic as ours still is, and hopefully remains.

In 2020, there were about 240,000,000 eligible voters in the United States, of whom 158 million actually voted. 81, 282,632 voted for Joseph Biden.  His major opponent garnered 74,223,234 votes.  The remaining couple of million or so voted for a large assortment of non-starters.  App. 82,000,000 didn’t vote at all – about one-third of the total eligible.

Generally down-ballot and mid-term vote totals are much lower than the vote for President.  Therein lies the problem and the potential for 2022.

Then there’s the nitty-gritty for everyone: do you even know who  the candidates are for every electoral office in your area, and where they stand on the issues?

*

There is a bottom line: As noted above, every eligible voter has equal power.  This has nothing to do with personal wealth, status, race.  Every person has a single vote.

There are only two U.S. parties with popular standing and history: Democrat or Republican.  Votes for other party candidates are throwaway votes.  Those who don’t vote at all have zero standing.

In my opinion, the American voter has a stark choice November 8: the most reasonable, or most extreme candidate from either the Democratic or Republican Party.  But each person at the very least has to know who these people are.

For those with a Primary – Minnesota’s is August 9 – the ballot will be determined after the Primary election.

Then it is up to each us.  The polls don’t matter; neither do the ads, which will be ubiquitous and all misleading regardless of for which party.  Who we elect has consequences past Election Day.

It takes a little work to find out who your candidates are; and it takes a little work, perhaps, to find out how to register to vote and details about where to vote.  Do it.

There are a little less than 100 days to Election Day – more than enough time.

 

Uncle Vincent’s Pocket Knife…

PRE-NOTE to everyone:  August 6 and 9 are the 77th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  There is a significant on-line event relating to this with segments Aug 3, 6, 10, 17, 24, 31.  Details are here.  Pre-registration is required for each segment, and early registration is recommended.  This is worth your time.

To Minnesotans, Primary Election Day is August 9.  Know the candidates and the issues and VOTE well-informed.  More information here.  Click on the box “What’s on my ballot?” if not certain of issues in your area.

(Monday and Tuesday, August 1&2 I plan to have two politics-specific posts.  Do check back.)

Following are several items.  One or more may be of interest to you.

  1. A Memory: Uncle Vincent’s Knife.

We were enroute home July 20, and an apple beckoned, but I had nothing to cut it with.

At the time I was the passenger, and I remembered that in the glove box was Uncle Vincent’s key ring, which included the pocket knife which had given him long and faithful service.   That key ring went everywhere with him, farm and town; fishing, church….  The knife was a multi-purpose tool, not a weapon.  It would do things like cut rhubarb in the garden, and such.

I took the knife and ‘cleaned’ it like back on the farm.  A nearby ragged handkerchief did the duty.

The apple was delicious.

Why, you ask, was that key ring in the car?  Uncle Vince died over 7 years ago, the last of a large farm family which included my mother, his sister, (who was 16 when he was born).

Vince lost custody of his car keys a year earlier when his residence changed to the memory care unit of the LaMoure Nursing home.  Not an easy transition at age 89, but necessary.

I became the custodian of the keys, seldom had use for any of them. But they’ll be with me until I depart this earth, a reminder, I guess, of many rich conversations with my Uncle, and of family.  Thanks, Vince.

Vincent’s knife, July 20, 2022

2.  A Model: Virgil’s Oxbow Project

Two days earlier, I’d been up to rural Huot, near Red Lake Falls, MN, for a visit with my long time friend, retired Professor of French, and passionate French-Canadian, Virgil Benoit.

Virgil has been an advocate for over 40 years, and Oxbow at Old Crossing (new Facebook presence) is his most recent project.  Oxbow probably best conveys his true legacy, which is building community; truly crossing boundaries.

Virgil showed me the various projects in process on the oxbow.  They include tree planting and traditional gardening.  They involve more people than himself,  and the ideas are multifaceted.  Oxbow is a community working together.

Recently he sent a newsletter, with a description of the initiative.  Here is a copy for your perusal. Benoit Virgil Oxbow Fdn.

Virgil Benoit with young beet, Oxbow garden, Huot MN, July 18, 2022

3.  Another Model:  Annelee 

The trip north centered around our friend, Annelee, soon to be 96, in a time of transition in her own very long, productive and interesting life.

Much of her adult life, Annelee was a teacher in a northern Minnesota town.  I got a first look at her school on this trip, and found an unanticipated plaque on the wall of the school, with 13 other members of the “Hall of Fame”.  The light situation didn’t mitigate for a good photo, but here’s what I saw on the wall of the school about my friend.

Annelee was (and still is) an outstanding teacher, another unsung hero, as is Virgil, was Vincent, and so many others, everywhere who we come across in our daily lives..

4.  A Learning Opportunity for You: A Private Universe

Back in the late 1980s, my friend, Kathy, then a 5th grade teacher, sent me a handout from some inservice she had attended.  It had spoke to her.  I read it, and I kept it.

A couple of weeks ago for whatever reason she sent me the exact same handout she’d sent years ago.  It caused me to look at it much more carefully, and it spoke to me, and I think it can speak to all of us in these days when getting stuck in our own certainty is a major problem for our very society.

I think it came to me because she and I had recently chatted about the difficulty of conversing about politics in general, even with people we know well.

This time, I looked up A Private Universe on the internet, and I invite you to do the same.  In 1987 it was a learning research project with junior high school students, which apparently endures.

I invite you to in particular watch the videos #1 (the original, featuring junior high kids) and 8 (Q&A some years later with the ‘star’ of the original), which won’t take much of your time, and then translate their topic to your own contemporary idea about communicating with people with differing opinions from your own about most anything.

I think you’ll find the time well spent, and learn something about yourself as well.

Here’s the sheet Kathy sent me, not complete, but you’ll get the idea: Private Universe 1980s.  The videos will add much more.

*

We learn in small and sometimes seemingly insignificant increments.  For me, simply in this post, the “teachers” have been Mom, Virgil, Kathy, Annelee and many, many more.

Yours?

*

Two additional items well worth your time:

from Fred, re life in Russia:  Bill sent this very interesting take on the long suffering Russian people and the great writers who documented their eternal misery under despotism.

This article from the Atlantic, though less than encouraging, speaks to the hope that Russia can still overcome its long tradition of submission to despotism.
*

from Molly: Excellent and important article from Tom Snyder.  Not an upper of a piece, but important, thought-provoking,  and right on….

Also read the comment below the essay by Linda Macdonald (July 23)

Sigh.

Worry.

Work.

Molly

PS: if you’ve not read yet Snyder’s 2017 book On Tyranny, it is an important and fairly brief read…

Self-Rule and Survival

Or: What the War in Ukraine (and the Coup in America) is Actually About

COMMENTS (Also see end off post);

from Christine:

I have been particularly interested in this last post of yours. The family and rural environment that has been yours in your youth is so well described that I thought I was part of it.
Your analysis of the Ukraine/Russia war is given here a light that we don’t hear so often
Finally, your view on the US political ambiance seems easy to understand. It is precious for me as a European.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I read them regularly but do not always react and maybe I should.
I respect your continuous work of writing and I am honored to receive this blog of yours.
I hope you keep well as it seems.
I will be back to the US with my film over the Fall and, of course, you will be informed amongst the first since you are my friend and you are in it!!!
*
from Christina, now in her 90s:

My youngest sister spent a lot of time with us. She was only three when we got married. We had a baby one year after we were married and she was almost like one of our kids.  When  mom and dad moved to Fargo, and she was older, she spent most of her summers with us.

One day she was out bailing and had trouble with the twine string that was binding the bales and when John went to help her he said “A feller should always have a jackknife in his pocket.”  she said “but I don’t have a jack knife” and he pulled a jackknife out of his pocket.  It had a broken blade, and gave it to her and said “now you’ve got a jackknife.” Now that she’s been married and her kids are grown and married her kids found that knife in her treasury stuff.  They asked her about that knife…and she told them don’t ever touch that knife.  It’s mine.

I sent her your blog with the story of Vincent’s knife.  I think she will appreciate it.

 

Hubris

Tonight on prime time (Thursday July 21) is the 8th hearing of the Jan. 6 committee.  Following are some personal observations.

UPDATE July 22: Heather Cox Richardson, July 21, 2022

*

July 13, 2022.

After the last Hearing on July 12, I recalled the old saying: “give a man enough rope and he’ll hang himself“.  The link gives a history of the term.  Yes, this applies to women, too!

I watched the hearing as usual.  Here’s Heather Cox Richardson’s summary.

Early on at this space I’ve said that these Hearings are to establish a record for posterity.  What happens in court is separate and will come in its own time, if at all.

I have also said that the hearings have been structured, beginning with the small fry – the criminals who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 – and ending with the spotlight on the godfather, so to speak. The Guy who orchestrated it all thought he’d accomplish the fraud, but the very long rope he’s relied on his whole life is now in the process of (figuratively) hanging him and his accomplices.  The truth is outing, as it is always  inclined to do.

Living a lie, large or small or immense, has consequences.  It only takes time.   (Of course, this applies to all of us as well, including lying to ourselves – manufacturing a false reality.  But that’s another topic.)

*

Doubtless the audience for the hearings has (and will) include legions of lawyers and students of law; plus the Big Deals of politics, including those who say they won’t watch.

This Congressional hearing is an entity of its own, and doesn’t operate by the same rules and timelines as Court.  The hearings are intended to inform we, the people.

Succinctly, the Law, parallel to the Hearing, is not Perry Mason,  or 48 Hours.

Anyone ever encountering the law, personally, knows it is not a simple process.  Law is a profession with a very long and honorable history, an adversary process, as opposed to mediation or conciliation, and effort towards Justice.

The Department of Justice is criticized for not moving more quickly, or moving at all.  The criticism is designed for public consumption.  The process is working as it has always worked, and we should be thankful for that.

The Legal and the Legislative process is methodical and involves lots and lots of what I would call committee deliberations in preparation, pro and con.

(The famous Nuremberg Trials after WWII began shortly after the end of WWII and concluded four years later, in 1949.  Not all stood trial, of course.  Hitler, the big fish, was dead.  Etc.)

July 21, 2022

I began this post July 13.  Much has happened in the intervening days, up to and including today.

On and on this goes.

Heather Cox Richardson has become, for me, a personal reliable source of honest reporting.  Here and here are her posts since July 13.  Her nearly daily posts are worth following.

The insurrection aftermath reminds me of another quotation from the past: “Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive“, a caution about consequences of lying.

It’s one thing when #45’s  empire was real estate and he was a one-man show. It is something else again when you are responsible for an immense country of great diversity and it is impossible to keep the lid on information which before you could hide behind things like non-disclosure agreements and such.

Personal Perceptions.

I have no idea at all what the final outcome will be in this, the worst constitutional crisis our country has encountered since the Civil War.

Neither does anyone else know, no matter how high and mighty they might be.  There are endless opinions and theories.  The process continues

I think the ex-president will be indicted and tried and  likely convicted, but the actual court decision, if it goes to trial, could be years off, absent some other resolution between.

The ultimate focus has always been the capo, the head, #45.  By all accounts, he has always been accustomed to winning by his own rules, and personal winning by any means necessary has always been his modus operandi.  “Me” is his only focus.

Winning the U.S. presidency was a plum he never expected.  It’s largest fringe benefit, I feel, was essentially a perception of immunity from accountability, including having the ability to pardon others, potentially including himself.  That was the biggest fringe benefit for #45 , the driver to lust to run again in 2024.

He still has lots of support including members of law enforcement military, bureaucrats, lawmakers, on and on.

He has plenty of allies.  Should he win, all of them will be like his opponents: the victims, short and long term.

Personally, I doubt we’ll ever actually see another ballot with his name on it, but again, nobody knows.

As they used to say on the farms, “the chickens are coming home to roost”.  The gig is up.

POSTNOTE: There is a larger issue here being fought.  For our entire history,  white men (meaning “men”) ruled, especially those already with privilege.  These folks not only made the rules, but controlled their enforcement.  This hegemony is being challenged, by women, by persons of color, by persons of less privilege, and so on, and it is a struggle that needs to happen until better balance of some sort is legally and permanently achieved.  I’m part of the privileged class.  I support the struggle for change.

COMMENTS (more at the end of post):

from Joyce: I so hope you are right about his being indicted and convicted. I’m not so optimistic, and I truly fear for our democracy.

response from Dick: Of course, I have no more or less knowledge of what will happen, but you have to remember that you and I are not the only people in the country that don’t want the American Experiment of over 200 years fail!!!!.
It will take a long while to get to the end of this, so I won’t make a bet. But…mark my words! Your guess and mine will be memorialized in the blog!!!

from Fred: We haven’t missed a word of these hearings. It’s a two buckets of popcorn night this time.

 

 

 

 

North Dakota

PRE-NOTE: What is North Dakota about?  This year you have the advantage of a new book which I’ve publicized at this space two or three times, and continue to highly recommend:  ” Clay Jenkinson’s “The Language of Cottonwoods.  Essays on the Future of North Dakota”.   There are many reviews.  Here’s the Table of Contents: Jenkinson Lang Ctnwoods Contents.   Whatever your connection with the state, if you’re at all interested, read this book.

*

Most of last week I spent in North Dakota.  It was not a secret trip.  Friend Jane, in California wrote: “North Dakota?  Sooo jealous.  The only state I haven’t visited yet.  Plan to go next summer, hopefully even get to Standing Rock.

Having grown up in ND, in many towns, and an almost annual visitor there, I can speak with some authority about the prairie state.   The book I recommend at the beginning of this post will do a much better job than my scribbles in defining present day North Dakota.

North Dakota is a pretty normal place with its pluses and minuses, as is true everywhere.  I could make lists.  No need.  Suffice, we’re a nation that defines others by labels and extremes.  We’re mostly just folks: think of yourself and the people you know, personally.  Then think of what leads the news, regardless of the medium; the latest of anything that brings the outside world to your attention….

A few personal notes here: DB ND July 2022

Below is my  2022 ND road map.  It seems a better visual than assorted random photos between Fargo and Bismarck.   Generally, had you been along, you’d have seen lots of green and open farm area, interspersed with tiny towns, mostly, along the mainline of the old Northern Pacific railroad and U.S. Highway 10.  Of course, the interstates intentionally by-passed the small towns everywhere, which didn’t help the local economy, but so goes progress

The weather was magnificent summer weather.  I travelled in the southeast quadrant: I-94 and a little south, as far west as the Missouri River.

There was a relatively small amount of summer road construction on I-94.  75 is the legal speed limit in ND. Bismarck to St. Paul is about the same distance as from St. Paul to Chicago…400+ miles.   It was a hike for someone my age, alone.

Fargo-Moorhead on the east border is the Prairie metropolis, truly.  Still, the centerpiece artifact at the Fargo visitor center is the woodchipper made famous in the Coen Brothers movie, “Fargo”, which really had nothing much to do with Fargo or North Dakota, but both added to the marketing appeal of the film.  Stereotyping?  Sure, but you take what publicity you can get.  As the quotation attributed to someone(s) goes:  “I don’t care what they say about me, just spell my name right.

North Dakota road map 2022

My first stop in N. Dakota, and my first visit, was with my friend, Larry, in Fargo on July 5.  I told him about Jane’s comment (above), and said I’d like to take a photo of a real North Dakota ‘hayseed’, and he was more than happy to oblige (more at the end of the post about him).  He’s lifelong NoDakker, escapes the bounds of the state now and then, but always returns.  He’s the real deal!

Larry at West Acres, Fargo ND July 5, 2022

Jane isn’t the first to have told me that ND has never been their destination.  We have some kind of reputation, I guess.

I thought about Eric Sevareid’s famous commentary in Colliers Magazine in 1956.  He was born and raised in Velva, not far from Minot and Karlsruhe (where I lived 1951-53).  “You can go home again” was the headline.  Between his growing up in Velva (1912-25), and the 1956 commentary, Eric had become a celebrity to those in my generation.  He only lived a while in Velva as a youngster, but in a sense he never left.

There was a time when I would hesitate to say I was from North Dakota.  That reticence is long past.  I’m proud I grew up there, and in a larger sense, I’ll never really leave, though I’m more than 57 years out of state, most of that a ‘city slicker’ in metro Twin Cities Minnesota.

North Dakota is a pleasant place to visit, Larry and others make it so.  For me, “others” this year meant 10 folks I know.  My particular business this year focused on the State archives in Bismarck where my family has a presence (collection 11082).  I’ve gone back to the archives about once a year or so, usually for a couple of days.  Enroute out and home, I enjoy my state and I visit. This year was no different.

*

What about Larry (picture above)?

I’ve known Larry G for over 60 years.  When I was in college, he was a high school classmate of my future wife.  I didn’t know him then, except that he was the announcer with a superb radio voice on local radio, KOVC in Valley City.

I didn’t know he was a high school kid.

He went on to success in other areas, and in retirement he blogs as I do.  His turf is HERE.    I think you will like his content.  His information is shared with his permission.   Take a look.  Pieces about Garrison Keillor, Louis L’Amour, “Fargo”, Bobby Vee….

One of my destinations last week came via a tip from him as we conversed.

Oldtimers will remember renowned singer Peggy Lee, who started life as Norma Egstrom of Jamestown ND [July 13: as my college roommate Richard reminds me, below, she actually grew up in tiny Wimbledon ND].   Turns out that she did her first live radio gig probably in the same KOVC studio where Larry Gauper did his announcing.

He told me about a mural on the side of the building that was the radio station and I stopped to see it.  Sure enough, there it is:

The stories go on and on.  If you have the chance to go to North Dakota, go.  You won’t regret it.

And pick up Clay Jenkinson’s book on the Future of North Dakota, “The Language of Cottonwoods”.

Cleveland ND on I-94 from the south July 5, 2022

Missouri River at Bismarck ND July 7, 2022

COMMENTS (more at end of post):

from Mark: Not So Wild a Dream  is one of Eric [Sevareid]’s best pieces of writing about our region.

from Debbie: Thanks for this, Dick.  I taught music in South Dakota on a Sioux reservation and would often go home with one of the teachers from North Dakota – Buffalo.  People there LOVED N. Dakota and called it God’s Country.

I think Lawrence Welk is from there too!  I drove through his home town once.
Unlike your friend Jane, I’ve been to all the states but Oklahoma.
*

from Fred:  My take away from your ND travelogue: Peggy Lee was born in North Dakota??!! That is something of which to be proud.

Actually, your journey sounded pretty interesting. But that’s coming from a big city guy from Red Wing, so what do I know?
*

from Jeff: Thanks Monsieur Bernard….I miss my several times a year visits to Fargo/Wahpeton/Breckenridge, and other points west, north and south in Nodak. I still vividly remember driving east on ND15 I think , between Northwood and Thompson, and a storm came in behind me from the west and I was watching a tornado move to my south maybe 2 miles away just moving along for about 3-4 minutes west to east before dying out….

It really is an interesting state…but the winds in the winter…uff dah.
Dick’s response: The wind is to keep the riff-raff out…!
*
from Rich: So we are fellow “No Daks” … I had to learn the song below in Miss McGraith’s fifth grade classroom in Minot. (Ironically, this is the NDSU choir … from the alma mater of Bill Haring.) As for me, Minot was a great place to grow up … Nestled in a river valley, 50 miles from Canada, it had some interesting history that caused it to be known by some as “little Chicago.” during prohibition.
from Dick: Rich provides a Facebook link to an article for those of you who do Facebook, here.
*

from Mary:  I think all ‘Bernard Kids’ get to be unofficial ambassadors of North Dakota!  Many versions and many memories.  I am sure I have told you of attending a function where a local well-heeled traveler bragged of having visited “all 49″ states.  Of course I asked which one she had not visited and got a hoity toity response…”well, North Dakota, but why would anyone go there!”   Another time I was ushering and a fellow usher was so intrigued with my home state connections that I became an immediate ’cause celeb’!  She brought friends to see me in the flesh and was genuinely thrilled with her find!

I have been to all fifty states and have worked in twelve states…but then again, I am old!

 

 

 

 

The Fourth of July

It’s a rainy day in our community, so the expression “rain on our parade” is probably appropriate for the nearby town of Afton’s annual parade.

July 4 is when we celebrate how exceptional we are.  This year “exceptional” has a very different definition than previous years, in my opinion.  We are awash in uncertainty and division.

Some opinion pieces reflect my personal opinion, this day:  One or more of these may be subject to a pay wall.  But all of them are well worth your time.

“Happy Fourth?” by Dan Rather and Elliot Kirschner

“For the first time in my life…” by Charles Pierce, Esquire

July 2 by Heather Cox Richardson

Our Gun Myths Have Held America Hostage for Too Long” by Franciso Canti, New York Times guest essay

Sunday afternoon I had the fortunate opportunity to watch a portion of the PBS program on the American Space Program of the 1960s, which began with President Kennedy’s famous speech calling on us to have a man on the moon by the end of the 1960s; the decade ending with three men accomplishing the goal on July 20, 1969.

These were three two hour episodes of American Experience: Chasing the Moon (#’s 3103, 3104, 3105)

I wrote of my personal experience that day 5 years ago: Apollo 11.

Of course, much life transpired between JFK’s aspiration, and the accomplishment of the goal, including the assassination of JFK; the Civil Rights accomplishments largely on Lyndon Johnson’s watch; the conflicts of the Vietnam era; the competition with the Soviet Union, on and on.  But the program did give excellent context to me about what we are going through now in our national conversation about what we are as a nation.

Of course, July 20, 1969, was a national celebration, literally.  A goal achieved, against all odds.  If you can, the referenced program is a good one to access if you can.