Veterans for Peace National Conference, St. Paul

/0 Comments/in /by

The Veterans for Peace National Conference is in St. Paul this week.  Here are details, including a pdf of the Program Booklet.  I’ll be there for at least the day sessions Thursday and Friday.  I’m a longtime member.

This 8×10 by Robert Muldar was given to dignitaries at the 90th birthday of Harold Stassen in 1997.  It symbolizes the United Nations, then 52 years old Stassen was the last living signer of the United Nations Charter in 1945.

Across town, in Minneapolis, this week, is the National American Legion Convention.  This year is the 100th anniversary of the founding of the American Legion, as it is the 100th anniversary of the end of WWI, “The War to End All Wars”.  It takes little more than a cursory look at history to see how false was the hope of ending war by the winners humiliating the losers at the end of WWI.  WWII was the result 20 years later.

From a 1918 celebratory book on the winning of WWI.

Out of WWII came the United Nations which, while imperfect, has staved off WWIII, the war to end humanity, for over 70 years.  The United Nations has managed to change the tone of relationships between and among 193 nations and over 7 billion people to something more positive.  Former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan’s death on Saturday gives an opportunity to consider the real need for a United Nations.  One can hope that its “heart” can continue to convey a positive example to the rest of us, where we all live.  I’ve found Dr. Joseph Schwartzbergs 2013 book, Transforming the United Nations System, Designs for a Workable World, a very helpful and understandable volume.  Check it out, here.

Also, being recognized this week at the Veterans for Peace Convention in St. Paul is the 90th anniversary of the Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928, a valiant effort at legislating world peace among nations.  The pact is named in part for Frank Kellogg, Calvin Coolidge’s Secretary of State, who co-authored the important pact.  The venue for the Vets for Peace convention is on Kellogg Blvd in St. Paul, named for Frank Kellogg.

I happen to belong to both American Legion and Veterans for Peace.  The expression, “oil and water”, comes to mind about their respective philosophies, though both consist primarily of veterans of active duty in the U.S. military.

The Legion Convention will get the most press attention, I suspect.

I root for Peace.  As I once heard a victim of conflict powerfully say, we need “healers”, not “killers”.  Peace through Strength (War) is a contradiction in terms.  History shows, over and over, that it does not work, except in the short term.  Bodies and minds – “heroes” – lie in its wake.  We need to constantly explore why we  citizens refuse to recognize how deadly and worthless war is, for all of us.

My tiny contribution to this conversation is a piece I put together perhaps three years ago, on casualties of war as experienced by the civilians in the United States.  You can read it here: War Deaths U.S.002.  It is a single page, and speaks for itself.

 

After the Primary….

/1 Comment/in /by

This column is about the Democrat (DFL) side of the political conversation.  Doubtless there is similar discussion in the Republican universe.

Today, the DFL (Democrat) Central Committee is meeting to decide how to approach the 2018 General Election in Minnesota.  Its agenda is as agendas always appear: bland and boring.  Looks can be deceiving; I can guess it will be a long grueling day today.  If you pay any attention at all to elections, you’ll be interested in what the DFL Central Committee  decides.

A major part of todays agenda will be the 2018 Minnesota Primary Election results which you can view here.

*

Some thoughts:

As long as I can remember I’ve been fairly active politically, as a Democrat.  I vote, and I participate in the process up to the point of electing delegates to Congressional and State Conventions.

This years Primary in Minnesota attracted more interest than usual.  Voters could vote one column or the other (Republican or Democrat).  There were about 900,000 total votes cast, about two-thirds of them in the DFL column.  There was apparently much more interest by Democrats than Republicans this year.

The last off year election in Minnesota, the 2014 Primary had these results: less than 400,000.

Of course, the big event comes on November 6.

The 2014 General Election attracted near 2,000,000 voters.  The 2016 General Election near 3,000,000, out of 3.3 million registered voters.

I will leave the analysis to the individual reader.

*

The question is raised again about whether DFL endorsement process is worth doing; whether the caucuses are a waste of time…why bother?  After all, those of us who went to the caucuses were participating as citizens in the political process; those of us who agreed to go to the local Senate District or County Conventions the same; those of us who agreed to be delegates were representing certain points of view at the Congressional District and State Conventions.

Then the endorsements were (it appears) by and large ignored, by candidates, and voters.

Why bother?

*

Today the DFL Central Committee (which is, I gather, about 50 people) will try to sort out “stuff” relating to the aftermath of the Primary.

Once again there will be debates – probably passionate ones – and once again there will be recommendations about who to vote for in November.

It does seem like nonsense, but tell me a viable alternative.

I am one of those who respects the deliberative process, messy as it can be.  One can only imagine what result would occur if this country just had a general election and people just came in and marked down who they wanted for President, Governor, Mayor, Dog catcher, whatever.  No management of the process.   None.

It would be destructive chaos.

Maybe I’m talking about anarchy?  A system where order disappears; “freedom” reigns.  “Power” to the strongest, temporarily.

It would be sort of the system that I read about this morning in Just Above Sunset: Notes on the Apocalypse.

*

With all the messiness there is, I am glad that there is a DFL State Central Committee, a group of committed people willing to scrap amongst themselves and to come to a conclusion about where they stand about November 6.

The Primary  decided who will be on the ballot.  The Parties will have to decide who gets their active support.

Become very well informed, have conversations, vote November 6, wherever you are.  Our country’s future is worth your time.

After 2018, the debates can continue, possibly for changes in the existing system…but there must be a system for our republic to survive.

Propaganda

/0 Comments/in /by

POSTNOTE:  I noticed, here, that three of my four statewide candidates won in yesterdays Minnesota Primary election.  There’s much to learn from the results for all candidates.  Now, more or less 80 days to the main event, Nov. 6.  More at the end of this post.

*

Before yesterday’s Primary I outlined what follows below.  Just some thoughts on political propaganda:

One of several contested DFL seats yesterday was Attorney General (AG).  There were five DFL candidates for AG on the ballot, one of them MN Congressman Keith Ellison.

So comes the Aug. 13 (Monday) Minneapolis Star Tribune, top of the front page headline:

Election day, a followup in the same newspaper, well hidden on page 5 of the B Section headlined “Alleged Ellison video not released“, with a paragraph nestled in the middle that the person alleging the video would not be posting it for many reasons “including that it’s traumatizing, humiliating and sets an expectation that abuse survivors must prove their stories.”  Full article here:Ellison Aug. 14001.  It’s worth reading.

So it goes in the fetid swamp of political assassination.  Timing is everything.  Make it impossible for the accused to marshal a defense.  Somewhere there is truth, but this assassination attempt was made, with the Star Tribune complicit (it didn’t have to publish the story, much less give it primary front page headline the day before the election….)

Ellison’s experience is the reality every politician, (and every one of us in some way), confronts in this day of instant assessment of guilt.  Any politician with any moxie has to anticipate the most negative bombardment close to election day – “the October surprise”, it is usually called.

We will be bombarded with this kind of stuff from now until Nov. 6, and after.  Why?  Because it works…a sad commentary on us as citizens.

So, we know it’s coming.  The only antidote is to control our impulse to judge at the moment of accusation, anything written particularly by an opponent, or unflattering photos of the other candidate, or whatever else passes for political posturing.  Yes, this is hard.  Negative stuff, like the Ellison allegation, works…because we allow it to work.  In fact, we may even find it funny.  It is not.

*

There’s lots to say: some personal commentary on propaganda.

In this day of Government by Tweet, propaganda is very simple.  Here’s a good-humored example between friends.

My good friend, Frederick Johnson, mentioned that a review of his most recent book could be found in the latest issue of the well-respected journal Minnesota History.

I subscribe to the journal, but hadn’t seen the review, so when I got home I looked it up.  You can read the full review here: Patriot Hearts001.

Frederick and I are good friends, so after reading the review, I wrote him with my own review of the review:  “I cut into my very busy schedule today to read the review of Patriot Hearts.  My summary, and I quote directly from the review: [your] “judgments seemed a bit off”.  But, so what else is new!?”

c 2017, Goodhue County MN Historical Society

We had a good laugh.  My next sentence was “Of course, I jest.  Great job.”

Patriot Hearts was my book of choice for the annual week at the lake some weeks ago.  I highly recommend it.

But, this is about propaganda.  Yes, the reviewer of Fred’s book indeed had said “judgments seemed a bit off”  on two specifics (you can find this in the last paragraph of the actual review).  But three lines from the bottom, the reviewer concludes that Johnson’s book “Is a brilliant study in how easy it can be to use patriotism as a cover for subverting democracy for private ends.”

What I had done, of course, with my 6-word “review” in jest, was to ‘cherry pick’ the words that seemed to cast the book in the most negative light, when the totality of the review was very positive.

Of course, use or misuse of information has always been a problem.  Frederick, who is a respected historian in Minnesota, had to work with whatever documentary evidence was available.  His book is about 1917, the entrance of the U.S. into WWI, as played out in a single Minnesota County.  If you look through his 347 footnotes, they reference contemporary newspapers and such of the time.  He spent an immense amount of time in research to write his book.  Still, even historians have to go with the data that they have (which is far superior to a headline in a newspaper from two days ago…time gives context, which in Patriot Hearts case is 100 years.)

*

In this time in history when communication techniques are ever more sophisticated, and everything seems shorthand (Twitter, etc), it is a wonder that politicians are willing to say anything at all.  Anything can be twisted and manipulated by anyone, particularly if the audience is susceptible to the power of suggestion (think of the word “liar” which became a synonym for Hillary Clinton, when Mrs. Clinton was a world-class truth-teller compared to the Current Occupant of the Oval Office.)

Then there’s the matter of photographs.

In the good old days – say 1917 – it was hard work to take photos for publication; and hidden cameras, if they even existed, were very rare and difficult to manage.

Even then, people of note learned some tricks of the trade: if you’re going to have a glass of wine at the reception afterward, note first if there is a camera around, and if so, don’t get caught on film holding the glass.

Nowadays multiple cameras and recording devices can be and probably are everywhere in almost any room, and the owner of the photo or recording can pick and choose from amongst hundreds of possibilities showing the person in the best (or worst) possible light in a pro, or anti-piece.  It is a terrifying time for a public person, any public person.

There is plenty of room for discussion, even with just these examples.

The prudent advice is, I think, to train oneself to avoid depending on sound bites and such (of which Twitter is a main one)  to make judgements about anyone or anything.

Of course, most of us are susceptible to pitches, especially about things which resonate with our own biases, so the problem is a difficult one to control.  But it is something we can all work on.

Extra credit:  Take some time to look up the Creel Committee (Committee on Public Information), and Edward Bernays, who was part of that committee in 1917.  Bernays became one of the geniuses of propaganda (including advertising).  Bernays work helped teach Joseph Goebbels….  We are immersed in propaganda every day.  It has been perfected here in our own country.

POSTNOTE (continued)

In my previous post on the Primary Election, I listed all recognized candidates except one, Matt Pelikan, DFL endorsed for Attorney General.  There was a simple reason.  I had no context at all with him.  Nobody had said anything to me about him.

Sunday before the Primary, at a DFL Senior Caucus picnic, Matt Pelikan stopped by and talked with us for a few minutes.  His photo is below.  He is a young man and he is worth getting to know for the future.  Here’s his story.  Another young person who’s showing up, on the court.  Impressive.

Matt Pelikan, August 12, 2018

COMMENTS:

from Carol:  I disagree with your assessment of the article re Ellison.  Should papers not print something because it’s right before an election??  Then they would REALLY get accused of bias.  I’m pretty sure if Trump were accused of some horrendous deed right before the next election, we’d all want that printed…

It didn’t seem to hurt Ellison too much – since he handily won, anyhow.  Without the ton of early voters, it may have had more impact.
You DO know that this is the second woman to publicly accuse him of abuse, right?  The first was several years ago, while he was still married and she claims they had an affair.  Both the parties tried to get restraining orders on the other…
When things start piling up, then it looks more credible.  Plus, the woman’s son is the one who posted these allegations – against her wishes, apparently.
I just keep thinking of Obama, who in 8 years in office never had a whiff of sexual scandal (either present or past).  And, for that matter, neither did George W.
from Jane:  Interesting. Our History Alive show in Lanesboro the last two weekends of September is on 1918 and touches on the Commission on Public Safety and prejudice against Norwegians as a result.
from Lydia: Terrific column, Dick–& MUCH needed. Your simple & direct suggestions for how every one of us can engage in “internal” resistance to propaganda, snap judgements based on bias etc is VITAL for today’s world(especially during election seasons). Thanks! (I’ll be sharing your column)

War and Peace

/0 Comments/in /by

At Minnesota Vets for Peace Memorial Day May 28, 2018, near the Vietnam Memorial on State Capitol Grounds.

Today’s mail brought the first letter from Grandson Spencer, now, about three weeks into U.S. Marine Bootcamp at Camp Pendleton, California.  The contents are between he and I.  It was great to hear from him.  Next letter to him I’ll use the WWI stamps I bought this week.  The sheet headline: WORLD WAR I *TURNING THE TIDE.

WWI stamp and Spencer’s envelope.

In yesterday’s e-mails came notice of the upcoming national conference of Veterans for Peace in St. Paul.  The dates are August 22-26.  I’m a long time member of Vets for Peace, and I’ll be there.  Here’s the information.

I see no contradiction at all in being very proud of Spencer as he confronts a new reality in boot camp, and being very committed to Vets for Peace, an organization largely of veterans which thinks war is insane.

*

War seems much more salable than peace, at least as a political point.  Enemies are useful, then deadly.  World War I which ended 100 years ago this year, was to be “The War to End All Wars”, and did nothing but spawn WWII.  The famous Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928, whose co-author was from St. Paul, apparently penned the draft six miles from where I write, at Cedarhurst,

*

I don’t pretend to end war with this column, but rather hopefully one or more readers might take an interest in the following, which is, in my opinion, a romantizing of the power of war.

We each have our interests.  One of mine is a fascination with the nuances of history, family and otherwise.  It is so engrained as to be almost genetic.  So, when I found a large book in the abundant junk at the old family farm, I rescued it (cover below).

Decisive Battles, Brig. Gen. Charles King, published 1898

Personally, I feel we are in exceedingly dangerous times in our country, with an incompetent leader who we freely elected, whose allegiance has nothing to do with protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States of America.

We are very vulnerable to attack, and that attack will be by unconventional tactics – unknown to the person who wrote the old book you see pictured above.  We are already under such attack, but we don’t seem to care.  We will pay dearly.

Decisive Battles of the World ends with a Chapter on the battle for Santiago, Cuba, in 1898.  Compared with the other 52 battles described, Santiago wouldn’t rise to world class, but such things are the authors choice.

Succinctly, the 52 battles described are as they would have been at the time they were fought.  The first described was Marathon in 490 B.C.

Five involved Napoleon; six were American Civil War battles.

(Here is the list of battles the author felt were decisive: Decisive Battles001; anyone interested in the actual book can order it here.)

*

Of course, the deadly 20th Century had not yet begun, with World Wars I and II, and their players in the future.  In those 20th Century wars, the rules of engagement were largely the same as in all the previous engagements, only more advanced technology each time.

Today we are exceedingly vulnerable to technology and its misuse.  We generally seem clueless to this deadly risk, and that we are not in control of it, except by choosing what to believe or not.

I’m proud of Spencer, hanging in there in what will likely be the most taxing three months of his young life.  Hopefully, he will never have to use the skills taught young Marines.

POSTNOTES:

Quite frequently over the years I have found historical references at U.S. government websites, as I found Kellogg-Briand (above).  As noted at this site, history is no longer being maintained by our own government.  I believe this to be a deliberate decision to further bury history, and if so it is a dangerous decision, especially in this internet age, where people less frequently read books.

Decisive Battles had to have been my maternal grandfathers book.  He was born in 1880, and the Spanish-American War began 7 years before he and Grandma married and moved to the prairie of North Dakota in 1905.  How did this book get to the North Dakota farm?  My paternal grandfather was actually in the Spanish-American War, but the two Grandpas would not have met till Mom and Dad married 37 years later.  And I don’t recall Grandpa Bernard as being much of a reader, though he was plenty intelligent.  Who secured the book in the first place, and why, and why they saved it, will have to remain a mystery.

Author Charles King was a very interesting guy with an interesting family pedigree.  His bio says he was a commander at Pagsanjan Falls in the Philippines, and if so, he was there with my grandfather, then a private in Co. C. of the First North Dakota.  At Paete, Co. C lost four men.  I actually visited the Falls in 1994, a close call with history.

 

The Minnesota Primary Election

/3 Comments/in /by

A friend asked who I plan to vote for in the Minnesota Primary Election Tuesday, August 14.  More on that towards the end of this post.  If you’re Minnesotan, here’s the page to find the candidates who are on the ballot in your precinct for the primary.

Some personal observations:

It is easy to complain about  “politicians”, and “government”, and “bureaucrats”, and “taxes” and all of that, but a civilized society is essential to everyone, and in a diverse society, as ours is, we should be thankful that there are people willing to put their names and their opinions out there, and run for office – any office.

Freely elected representative “Government” civilizes.

We weaken ourselves by increasingly being a nation of individualists.  We can, now, ally within “tribes” of special interests, where members are in synch with each other, and can pretend other points of view do not exist.   This doesn’t square with “community” in the greater sense…but we are in community, nonetheless.

We are also a deeply and hopefully not fatally polarized society  When society plays the game as if the winner is the Super Bowl Champ, entitled to the spoils of victory, and the losers count for nothing at all, everybody loses.  You cannot thrive.  (The American Civil War – the ultimate Super Bowl – had winners and losers.  10% of then-Americans were casualties and we still haven’t recovered.  It was a necessary war, yes, but in its wake were unresolved problems still vexing us.  How would Abe Lincoln have dealt with the aftermath had he not been assassinated?)

Succinctly, speaking of the present day, there are more points of view than my own; others have needs that I don’t have, or can’t understand.  These differences are ignored or dismissed at peril.  Somebody has to help sort this out.  It is those “politicians” – and yes “bureaucrats” – in “government” who daily must take up the task of attempting to reconcile the irreconcilable.

*

We take elections for granted in this country, and it is a very dangerous habit.  The July/August 2018 AARP Bullletin (illustration above) notes that only 50.4% of Minnesota’s eligible population even bothered to vote in the 2014 midterm election…and Minnesotas participation was greater than three of its nearest neighbor states.  (More detail here.  A pdf of the graphic is here: Election 2014002)   Considering the entire United States, only 36% – about one of three – of those eligible even bothered to vote in 2014.

Primaries, such as ours, next week, attract even less interest and thus participation than the General Election, and when one considers those who actually vote, with minimal knowledge of what their chosen candidate has done or is likely to do, you have a frightening scenario, which leads to what we are facing now in this country, and what’s ahead long term for today’s young people, who will inherit what we leave behind.

Which candidates, at all levels for all offices, win on November 8 makes a huge difference.

The actions for success need to be personal; the results will be collective.

VOTE, VOTE WELL INFORMED, URGE OTHERS TO REGISTER AND VOTE, IN EVERY ELECTION.

*

The Minnesota Primary.

Like it of not, we are a two-political party nation.  With very few exceptions, after the Primary results are announced probably all successful candidates will have been endorsed by either the R or the D.

The D stands for Democrat (in Minnesota, DFL).

My opinion: at this time in our history, and for the foreseeable future, the only reasonable party, the party this country needs to have in charge, are people who stand for election as Democrats.  (This is the first time in my political life span that I have said this – I value the two-party system.)  

*

In my view, at this time in our history, the R is not what it used to be.

R is not Republican.

For several years, R has increasingly meant Radical Party (I’d even add Right and Religious), and the moderate R’s know this is true.  There is no room for a Dwight Eisenhower.  Nixon would in many ways be considered a “liberal” by today’s true-believer Radicals in today’s Republican power structure.

An endorsed R is, by all odds, a disciple of the Trump philosophy.  Trump himself is a creature of the Right, his success dependent on endorsement by the Republican establishment in 2016.  This is not an accident of history: it has been evolving for many years.

Republican used to be a perfectly respectable political party.  It was….  At this time it is not.

The goal of the kingmakers of the Radicals has been single party dominance and control of all government at all levels: people like myself deemed irrelevant and dis-empowered.  This is no secret and goes back 30 years or more; names like Norquist and Gingrich, and many others have facilitated this.  2018 is their zenith, thus far.  Their leadership despises the very government they wish to control.

For the good of the ordinary people of this country, these kingmakers of the Right must be reined in.  This will happen only if voters change our own exceedingly sloppy behaviors as the employers of those selected to manage our democracy.

*

To answer my friends question: in the DFL Primary and General Election I will vote for the Democrat who has, in my view, the most reasonable chance of success in November.  And if my preferred candidate does not prevail August 14, then I will vote for whomever the DFL party chooses to officially support.

In the Primary, my choices for statewide office:

U.S. Senator: Amy Klobuchar

U.S. Senator Special Election: Tina Smith

MN Governor and Lt. Gov.: Tim Walz and Peggy Flanagan

MN Attorney General: Mike Rothman

(There are perfectly reasonable and respectable alternative DFL candidates: There is lots to recommend Richard Painter for Senate; Lori Swanson and Rick Nolan, and Erin Murphy and Rick Nolan for Governor/Lt. Governor; several DFL candidates for Attorney General, Debra Hilstrom, Tom Foley, Keith Ellison.  But in the end I can cast only my single vote for each office.)

A PERSONAL AND IMPORTANT FOOTNOTE:

I would correctly be identified as a Democrat for nearly all my adult life, though I was not active politically till in my 30s.  I see the DFL and Democratic party as by far the most reflective of the “community” role of government.  Of course, this makes Democratic politics quite messy – lots of points of view.

Hubert Humphrey catches my bias well: “The moral test of government is how that government treats those who are in the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the elderly; and those in the shadows of life — the sick, the needy, and the handicapped.”  (Quotation 11-1-1977, note Government here.)

But some my most important political role models have been those who are now the extinct persons who would be proud to be called “Progressive Republican”.  There are many of these folks.  My list would include Harold Stassen in his influential days; it would include Gov. Elmer L. Andersen, who I counted as a personal friend; it would include Dwight Eisenhower, president in my high school and college years.

POSTNOTES:

There continues to be a flood of misinformation in public “media”.  For a tiny example: I know trash is being sent around using my e-mail address.  I receive it myself, and the ultimate insult is that I cannot block it because it is from, supposedly, myself.

Disinformation and misinformation is epidemic.  The antidote is to ignore it.

I treated myself to three books on a recent vacation.  Two were about politics and very interesting historical perceptions of the practice of politics in both the most positive and negative senses.  They are both carefully researched histories, heavily footnoted, and illuminating.  Check them out.

Patriot Hearts, published 2017,  is about 1917 in Goodhue County MN (Red Wing and area) in the run-up to the U.S. entering World War I.  The book can be ordered through Minnesota History Center bookstore.  “Passion and Prejudice” are its key words.  It is about patriotism run amuck.

Stassen Again is about Harold Stassen, who became a punchline for jokes, but who, between 1938-58, in his 30s and 40s, was a power actor in American politics, and a man with a passion for peace.  This book was published by Minnesota Historical Society Press in 2008, but gives plenty of food for thought for today.

COMMENTS (including in the blog comments section at the end):

from Phil:  Dick–thanks for your reasoned and straightforward opinion about politics today and in MN in particular.

from Jerry: Thanks for your comments, Dick.  I agree wholeheartedly.  You picked the same candidates as I intend to support.  What a disruptive time in American history.

from SAK: Thanks for that Mr Bernard.I note from the voting map that although the figures are low in general, still southerners are less likely to vote than northerners especially Alaska were presumably elections provide a welcome break & excitement during the long cold winters J!

A brief review  of Patriot Hearts I found on the  internet:

While world war raged in Europe, an America divided by ethnic, political and nationalist unrest struggled to come together. Nowhere were tensions greater than in Minnesota, then under dictatorial control of a temporary seven-man commission—arrests for treason multiply, watchful secret agents are on duty, a U.S. Supreme Court justice condemns the state’s “policy of repression.” Patriot Hearts details the ongoing clashes between superpatriots and their rivals, the political left, pro-Germans, and those less than “100% American.” Readable, relevant and carefully researched, this study supplies a fascinating supporting cast of radicals, seditionists, spies, firebrand farmers, profiteers and provocateurs who combine to tell an extraordinary story of Minnesota’s home front during the stormy 1917–18 war years.

[Dick:  here is another, longer, review from a recent issue of the Journal of the Minnesota Historical Society: Patriot Hearts001]

I wonder if there is a bit about the Protestant-Catholic divide in the book? Happily it is much less of an issue now but US history hasn’t been innocent in that respect – British history of course was far bloodier & Catholics suffered many episodes of repression & even carnage. Protestants suffered in neighbouring France bien sur! The “superpatriots” mentioned above  can claim that Catholics’ allegiance is to the Pope! This was used to defeat democratic candidate Al Smith in 1928 for example. It was much less of an issue in 1960 of course.

[Dick: this book was more about a clash of ideologies, and stoking fear of nationalities, rather than religion.  At the same time, at this period in history, the Ku Klux Klan was rearing its head, and in not too long Catholics became a major target in Minnesota and elsewhere.]

Throughout history it is more frequently members of minorities & those defending them who suffer persecution & assassination – Martin Luther King, JFK, Abraham Lincoln, MalcolmX . . .? Aristotle’s call for moderation (the golden mean) is as vital as ever: extremists tend to be obviously more violent. Extreme leftists as well as rightists – e.g. McKinley was assassinated by an anarchist.

With the rise of the internet & social media polarization, radicalization & hence extremism are on the increase; a report by a UK parliamentary committee last week concludes that the “wild west” world of social media & fake news etc is a serious threat to democracy. It made some very strong recommendations.

You also raise the important issue of individualism which some are referring to as hyper-individualism.

Another book I would heartily recommend is Age of Anger by Mishra. [Dick: I have read this book, and it is an outstanding review of the topic, as politically used.]

‘But Mishra’s governing idea that the world is afflicted by what Albert Camus astutely called “autointoxication, the malignant secretion of one’s preconceived impotence inside the enclosure of the self” isn’t off the mark.’

Good luck & may the best candidates win.

from Norm:  Good observations, Dick.

My father was in the state senate for 18-years before losing in a primary to another DFLer following a re-districting where two incumbents got thrown into the same new district.

I agree that in view of all of the demands and expectations put on and have it is great that many good people do run for office and, if successful initially, stay around to run for re-election.

I know that elected officials, i..e. politicians to most folks are easy pickings for folks who want to have someone to blame for this or that situation that has befallen them or their community.  Criticizing public employees is also easy pickings for the same reason.  The GOP candidate to fill Franken’s unexpired seat includes something about “do nothing bureaucrats” in her main TV ad.  As a former bureaucrat, I know that is not true in my long experience but I also recognize that making such claims regarding politicians and public employees is red meat for many folks…so making such claims is an effective campaign tool.

Good choices for the 14th as well!

from Pete: I like Keith Ellison a lot, but I’m afraid he would not do well in greater Minnesota.

from Peter:  I had a thought or two about all this, and went to the website, and could not see any comment buttons.  [Dick: There is a comment button.  Note comment at end of post.  Check again.]

Here’s something…

The book I’m working on tries to make the case that we each have sufficient power to save our world; that there was a major paradigm shift around 2014 that made possible the ascent of our current President to power; and that it matters where we direct our gaze. It was when the information markets tanked. They were displaced by a market nobody quite understands, the Audience Market.

Once the global networks penetrated the “last mile”, one person could send a billion people into “fight-or-flight” in seconds. That is a power that no human has ever had in the history of the world. Now, at least one human does hold that power.

A human brain reacts before we can begin to think. When we hear there might be hordes of drug-crazed rapists swarming over the border, a percentage of people get terrified. When a million people have such strong emotional reactions at the same time, well, we all saw what happened.

Fortunately, along with catastrophe, our networked society has brought a real possibility for humanity to survive the deadly, accelerating impacts of chemical changes in our upper atmosphere. We are developing the potential for real-time communal response that is quick enough to keep up with our rapidly deteriorating situation. Think of a flock of birds, or a school of fish.

Your attention is now your vote. Appeals for it are like appeals for your money. We take responsibility for our own attention whenever we notice how precious — how essential to our being — is each moment of awareness. There is some ground to cover, in harnessing this incredible artifact to save our world, and that work has started, and it begins with each of us, and it begins again in the next moment.

We are all equal citizens of continued human existence. Our attention is our only asset. It is enough. Individual-ity will never disappear, but individual-ism must. Otherwise, we are already extinct.

The stakes are really that high now.

Dick:  After publishing this, I went to a retirement party for a respected DFL legislator.  At least a couple of people had already read the post.  One commented that Richard Painter is anti-union; another referred me to a commentary on Lori Swanson, which you can read here.  The commentary is very long,  It is not complimentary.  I simply provide it for anyone interested.

I do not know Lori Swanson personally, and did not contribute to her campaign thus far, though I had (and have) positive feelings about her capabilities to lead a complex state.  I had written her on a couple of occasions, and received obviously personal and well thought out replies.  My only context for Richard Painter was his early and outspoken ethical concerns about the Trump operation.  I knew he was Republican.  He spoke out when few were being outspoken, and he was an informed critic.  His point of view is being supported by people on the progressive left who I respect.

Personally, I think conversation is essential at this time in our history, and not only between “birds of a feather”.  There is no perfect person; our society is far from perfect.  What we have now is abominable.

*

Wednesday, friends held a retirement event for our retiring State Legislator JoAnn Ward.  (Photo below.  Behind JoAnn is our State Senator Susan Kent).  “A good time was had by all”, as the weekly news report in the older days country newspaper would say.

JoAnn’s watchword, I think, would be “civility“, of which there is very little in today’s politics.  She’s taken her job of representing all of us very seriously and did a great job.  The same can be said of Sen. Kent.

I am very impressed with the young man who will be the candidate I’ll vote for as JoAnn’s successor.  More about Tou Xiong here.  If you’re in the area, for sure read “about Tou”.

Joann Ward August 8, 2018