Pot…Kettle
A recent e-mail reminded me of the old saying, “pot calling the kettle black” (“a person who is guilty of the very thing of which they accuse another and is thus an example of psychological projection, or hypocrisy.”).
Here’s an opportunity, whether you’re “pot” or “kettle” to consider both sides of the story. Comments are welcome. After reading the following, I’d encourage you to read this long article about truth and fiction, titled “The Value of Truth”: Michael Patrick Lynch Boston Review; as well as Michael Patrick Lynch Boston Review (2) (click to enlarge).
“Pot’s” e-mail, from Feb. 22, is down the page, the second half of this post.
I’m the “Kettle”, and since this is my piece of real estate I’ll go first…though you can certainly read “Pot” first if you wish. It would be nice to get a few responses on either/both.
What I don’t say below, is the most important comment which I add here: I have followed American politics for years, not obsessively, but often with interest, and often, active involvement. What “Pot” seems to forget is that his ‘side’, has attacked we others viciously and incessantly for many, many years. In retrospect, in my opinion, a definable ground zero goes back to folks, Republican warriors, like Lee Atwater, Newt Gingrich, Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh and others, back to more murky roots in the 1970s. Politics in the U.S. has always been a contact sport, but until recent decades it has generally been decent, and in recent years with unfettered and instantly and universally transmittable “speech” through twitter and the like, often transparently false, we have created our own problem, which only we can undo. Attack politics works, ultimately to the detriment of everyone, losers and winners.
(Following “Pot’s” comments, I’ll relate again my own political biography as a citizen.)
Kettle: As you know you and I are almost exactly the same age, along with Nancy Pelosi – 1940 kids.
My natural affinity and affiliation is liberal, and I’m active. So over the years a great many of the people I know best would consider themselves liberals, and it would not surprise you to know that they are nice people who tend to have a “big tent” philosophy. They are not easily pigeon-holed, or regimented. The old saying of Will Rogers, “I am not a member of any organized political party, I’m a Democrat”, comes to mind.” Hard as it can be, we take democracy seriously.
It is rather odd to hear that the liberals haven’t been nice: “For more than 4 years…was continually bashed by liberals”. I happen to be liberal, and for years and years the right wing has attacked, attacked, attacked…and your guy just joined the parade, which even preceded Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh. Maybe you don’t remember, but when you first corresponded with me back in the summer of 2011 you sent about 35 ‘forwards’ all on the favorite talking points of the radical right. One of them was from the guy who was President from 2017-21. His broadside came six years before he became President….
Then there’s the matter of that alleged $50,000,000 from teacher unions to Biden. You can search information on such things on the internet. The NEA and AFT (disclosure: I was staff primarily for NEA locals for 27 years) are large nationwide organizations with thousands of large and small locals. NEA alone has about 3 million members, but it is a wild misrepresentation to make a statement such as you did. The closest I could come to what seems to be a fairly reasonable representation of reality comes from a group called Blue Tent, as it describes itself here. Its article on the subject can be read here. Scroll down to the section on NEA and AFT. Here’s the pull quote from the article: NEA and AFT “…spent $5.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively, on outside expenditures as of October [2020].” MAYBE we’re talking $2.00 per member towards politics, and assuredly teachers are not a bloc who all think alike, politically or otherwise.
Back to Pot.
Pot: Dick, Why is it that most liberals in the media, Hollywood, and in universities are filled with hatred, intolerance, condescension, and racism? If you disagree with a liberal you are called a racist, a bigot, misogynist, or any other demeaning word they choose. For more than 4 years Trump was continually bashed by liberals. Now that Biden is President have you heard the questions he gets, like what kind of ice cream do you like, what is your dogs name, how do you feel about being President? Soft balls and mushy questions that give people the urge to purge. All the liberals have switched into the defensive mode rather than the offensive mode like during Trump’s term. When Rush Limbaugh died the roar of liberal hatred filled the airwaves.
from Peter: My first thought was “troll”. More likely, deep emotional wounds. A person grasping for dignity.
In my experience, people with a problem only begin recovery in the moment when they recognize the problem. Before that point they are often desperate to bond with others over their phobias.
Lots of us have family members in this condition and cannot just move on. In that case having it out in public is hurtful, and maybe even dangerous.
I see no opening for dialog there. My question is what (if any) difference a rejoinder could make, to anyone.
A useful question for them might be: “Where do you hurt?”
response from Dick: “Pot” isn’t a troll – at least not here – having been on my distribution list for many years, and never asked to be taken off the list. Pot has previously expressed a point of view, which I have shared in this space. We don’t agree, obviously. I will comment to the individual directly as well. Similarly, Peter has been a good friend for many years. He and I tend to be kindred spirits philosophically.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!