#618 – Dick Bernard: Election 2012 #43. Why I’m strongly supporting President Barack Obama for Reelection, and the Democratic Party in the November election.

UPDATE 10:30 p.m. CDT September 5, 2012: Watch or read President Clinton’s address if you can. Link is here. This is a long speech, very on point.
Useful information resources if you are interested: Republicans should stop talking about the Moocher Class from Bloomberg News here and Economics for Voters here.
See postnote at the very end as well.
Two months from today – Wednesday, November 7 – we Americans will wake up and learn what we decided on November 6. I use the word “decide” deliberately. The word “decide” differs from “choice” in its finality. Decide is directly related to words like suicide, homicide, etc.*
As I reflect back over 50 years of eligibility to vote – I always vote – I see this as the most important election of my life. It is an election with huge long term consequences, especially for the people who think that buying the Republican siren song will serve them well.
I enthusiastically support President Obama for these reasons:
1. President Obama inherited the disastrous consequences of, particularly, 2001-2009 policies, and took on the task of getting the nation back on an even keel. He has succeeded beyond all odds. Against all odds, he advocated working together – negotiating and compromise. This was a major strength, in my opinion, even though some of his friends thought he’d sold out, and his enemies considered compromise a weakness to be exploited.
2. From day one his Republican adversaries made their number one objective making Obama fail. They announced this publicly and from the very beginning, they played it out in all of the ways they could muster in both U.S. Congress and U.S. Senate and Republican-controlled state-houses and legislatures. [Update Sep 8: How they did this is shown here.] They have tried to disappear the consequences of their own being in control of the government in the disastrous years of the first decade of the 21st century.
3. The Republicans failed in their efforts to make President Obama fail. Today, we are not where we’d like to be, but by any measure we’re far better off than we were four years ago when we were on the verge of collapse. By most any measure we remain an exceedingly wealthy country. There seems to have been one overriding objective of Obama’s enemies since he took office: to keep unemployment above 8%. They considered this is a winning number.
4. Unfortunately, people’s memories are very short; and we tend to be short-sighted. I am very concerned by the combination of very big money and the absolute lack of honesty in the media advertising onslaught to come in the next two months. This is the first election where, it appears, there is almost no interest in fact-checking, and lying is expected and accepted. We are seeing the reality of Newspeak (George Orwell’s 1984). Both sides manipulate information, but the Republican propaganda machine has been perfected, is far worse, and is far better financed than the Democrats. It is a dangerous development.
A little history:
Four years ago, September, 2008, no one, including the then-George W. Bush administration, could deny that our United States was on the verge of financial and industrial and real estate collapse. The reckless policies of the 2000s were coming home to roost.
As a nation we had lived on a credit card, where debt didn’t matter. As many know, life on a credit card is easy and fun…until the bill comes due. The people who gave us the credit card in the first place are now blaming Obama for the consequences.
2008 – four years ago – was a frightening time. For the first and only time ever, in 2008, I took steps to try to get my small 401-k account insured against the free-fall then occurring in almost the entire Financial and Big Business sector.
Here’s my graphic of who has run things in Washington since 1977: President, Congress, Senate (each has their roles, as set by the Constitution of our country); and their own internal rules: Congress 1977-2011001. I think this division of powers (and responsibilities) is important to understand.
We are the ultimate ‘politicians’, and we are reflected by whom we elect to office. Before you judge the current situation as “their” or “his” fault, consider reflecting on the recent past preceding 2009 and your personal role in it.

Minnesota State Fair Sep 1, 2012

Minnesota State Fair Sep 1, 2012

Then there’s the matter of political parties and the other offices.
I’ve always been Democrat (DFL, Democratic-Farmer-Labor), or at least so inclined. I’ve always felt that the Democratic Party has most in common with the ordinary people of this country, people like myself, or what is called the 99%. This year more than ever is a year to vote Democratic…unless you’re very wealthy and have only an interest in greater wealth.
But it isn’t that simple. My political hero and in a direct way mentor was former Republican Governor of Minnesota Elmer L. Andersen. I have had a great deal of respect for other old-line Republican lawmakers.
Elmer L. passed on eight years ago, but were he still alive he would have suffered the fate of moderate Republican leaders by being purged out of the Republican party, or at least made irrelevant by a more radical right wing.
Today’s Republican Party is a radical version of Republicanism, and until the moderates regain some control of the party activities, it is not a party to be trusted.
In many ways, todays Democratic Party resembles the old moderate Republican structure. Progressives don’t like to hear this, but I think I’m pretty accurate. The Democrats represent the center.
Those who vote Republican just because they’ve always voted Republican are making a huge mistake, in my opinion.
Those inclined to vote for certain losers or solely on their own specific single issue(s) just to make some point or stay true to their own ideals are making a mistake. Third parties as often hurt the so-called “lesser of two evils” than helping the third parties cause. In a diverse society, single pure ideological issues are easy to promise and almost impossible to attain.
On November 6, vote, and vote well informed.

* – NOTE: There is an “end-game” referendum aspect to this particular election. For many years an oft and publicly stated goal of powerful anti-tax leader Grover Norquist and his acolytes has been to shrink the size of government (at least the aspects of government he doesn’t like) till it can be “drowned in a bathtub”. How to do this? Very simple (it’s already been done). Make the government seem unwieldy and dysfunctional and unresponsive, de-fund it (the big tax cuts of 2003), make the citizens angry at it because they can’t get services they need, and they see the gridlock in Congress…and use this frustration to take over that very government. This strategy is very close to paying off for Norquist and his ilk. If he succeeds it will be a day most of those voting for it will come to regret…but by then it will be too late. Sure, this is speculation, but it is informed speculation from watching the political propaganda process for over 40 years.
POSTNOTE: I write often about political topics. This is #43 in the last several months, all of which relate to 2012. To see a list of the others, simply enter Election 2012 in the search box and click enter. A list will come up. The 42 previous posts relate to an assortment of topics. There will be many future commentaries as well. Check back once in awhile.

#615 – Dick Bernard: Election 2012 #40. Four years after Peace Island

Today, September 2, 2012, is the fourth anniversary of the first day of Peace Island, “Hope in a Time of Crisis, A Solutions-Driven Conference”. Peace Island was a remarkable and exhausting Tuesday and Wednesday running at the same time as the Republican National Convention just two or three miles down the road in downtown St. Paul, September 2-4, 2008.
Earlier today, I received word that my committee colleague who helped organize that Conference, Verlyn Smith, passed away on Friday, August 31, 2012. Susu Jeffrey, who originated the idea of Peace Island, commented “Oh, the loss! What I liked so much about Verlyn is…just himself, this large, gentle presence with the thoughtful, often humorous, comments.”
Indeed.
Verlyn’s memorial service will be next Sunday, Sept. 9, at 3 p.m. at Grace University Lutheran Church, 324 Harvard St., Minneapolis 55414. He was a retired Lutheran Pastor and his last call was at Grace Lutheran. Here’s the only photo I have of him at the Peace Island Conference. He’s the man seated at the right. (click to enlarge a bit)

Verlyn Smith (at right) Sep. 3, 2008 at Peace Island. Speaking is Ray McGovern, in background is Coleen Rowley.


Peace Island was a rather remarkable event. In the end a total of at least 23 speakers, mostly nationally known, addressed the audience in a half dozen plenary, and several other specific sessions. Several hundred people attended one or more of the sessions.
Peace Island was so peaceful that it attracted no interest from the news media, including the alternative media from the the progressive left who, to our knowledge, never did any reporting from or even about the event.
This wasn’t due to lack of effort on the Peace Island organizing committee’s part.
Our event was just too peaceful, apparently. It was boring from a news standpoint, in other words.
The action was down the street in St. Paul, inside and outside the Republican National Convention. Paradoxically, even those committed to peace and justice seem to revel in conflict.
Peace Island covered a great array of topics. Here is a five-page portion of the program booklet for Peace Island: Peace Island Sep 2-3 08001
Our committee quite literally wrestled with all aspects of the agenda for nearly two years before it convened. We were all volunteers. Visionary with the idea was Susu Jeffrey who, with Dennis Dillon, ultimately the chair, moved the idea forward.
Others on the committee included Dick Bernard, John and Marie Braun, Rebecca Janke, Ann Lewis, Bob Milner and Verlyn Smith. A couple of us, including Verlyn, were laid low with serious illness at one time or another.
The program was solely sponsored by the Minnesota Alliance of Peacemakers (MAP).
We early on decided that the conference would be solutions based. It is difficult to keep such a focus when there are so many problems, but the speakers generally did their best.
Perhaps the speaker with the greatest problems to confront ‘back home’ was Anne Hastings, Director of the Haitian microfinance group Fonkoze. During the summer and fall of 2008 four separate hurricanes hit Haiti causing immense disruptions and death and destruction in the tiny country. Fonkoze was a nationwide agency serving the needs of the poor, and its members severely hit. This was one and one-half years before the earthquake of January, 2010.

Anne Hastings, Joseph Schwartzberg and Bharat Parekh, Sep. 3, 2008


At demonstration on Labor Day 2008 in St. Paul MN


Massive police presence on the streets of St. Paul Labor Day 2008. Note policeman filming the protestors.


Concert at Peace Island Picnic Sep 4, 2012. This was separate from the Conference but a directly related event. In foreground is Tao Rodriguez-Seeger, Pete Seeger's grandson.


Preparing a giant peace sign to be photographed from above (it worked)


Completed peace sign can be seen here.

Gunboat on the Mississippi "protecting" RNC convention goers from peace island folks


In 2008, Peace Island was scheduled at the time of the Republican Convention in St. Paul.
Today, four years later, September 2 is between the Republican Convention (in Tampa last week) and Democratic Convention (in Charlotte, this week).
Problems continue and will continue so long as people are on this planet.
Working towards solutions should still be our objective, for the ultimate good of the planet earth.
Final Thought: Reports on events like this, including mine, are almost impossible to objectively report about. They are full of emotion from one side or another.
But there are other ‘sides’ to the story. When I was scanning the photo with the armed and dangerous police along the parade route, I got to thinking about a burly uniformed Ramsey County officer I was standing behind at the local coffee shop some months ago. I had noticed his shoes and we struck up a conversation about the kinds of shoes police personnel wear. The only thing I remember from the conversation was his comment that his feet hurt when he was on guard during the Republican National Convention….

#612 – Dick Bernard: Election 2012 #38. Joe Biden, Pat Kessler and Niall Ferguson

Today, I decided to attend the Vice President Joe Biden event at the Depot in Minneapolis.
I’ve attended these kinds of events before, so I knew exactly what to expect. It took an hour out of yesterday to pick up the ticket, then four hours today to drive over, stand in line, stand inside waiting for the Vice Presidents half hour speech, then drive home afterwards. I was there for the entire event.
It was a good day. I’m tired.
(click on photos to enlarge them)

V. P. Joe Biden, August 21, 2012, The Depot, Minneapolis MN


There was nothing unexpected in the vice-president’s remarks. I heard Pat Kessler of WCCO-TV report live back to the Noon News on ‘CCO that Biden was in the Cities to “fire up the troops”, or words to that effect.
Of course, motivating supporters is a totally appropriate use of time for a candidate. Kessler, who is my favorite local TV reporter on political matters, was stating the obvious.
(Like all the camera people and reporters, Kessler was “penned in” the press area, certainly not roaming the crowd. I watched Pat as he did his work, writing his notes, walking around in the ‘pen’, contemplating his thoughts.)

Pat Kessler reporting at noon, August 21.


I wondered how much time Kessler’s piece would get on the WCCO-TV evening news. Back home I watched, and he got about three minutes, only perhaps a minute of which was about the event in which I had invested five hours of my time. This is not a criticism. He was doing his job. And he does it well. He always seems fair, and cares about getting his information right, and conveying it in as objective manner as possible.
But if TV news is where people get a lot of their political news, they certainly get no depth of coverage at all. Maybe 20 minutes of that half hour news program is advertising; the rest divided into the traditional “news, weather, sports” with perhaps some special features thrown in (the State Fair is coming up and ‘CCO will do the news from there….)
Back home, I picked up the mail which included, this day, Newsweek’s August 27 edition, with President Obama on the cover, and the cover article, “Hit the road, Barack. Why We Need a new President” by Niall Ferguson.
I’d gotten a preview of this article the previous day through two commentaries challenging Ferguson’s methodology and his interpretation of facts. You can read them here and here. UPDATE Aug 22: Another one, from Business Insider, came today and is here. And another, here.
Because Ferguson is a writer of some prominence, and because Newsweek remains a magazine of some credibility, Ferguson’s printed words get credibility that apparently they don’t deserve. Likely very few of the Newsweek readers get the benefit of a critique of Ferguson’s objectivity. The choice is to accept his opinion or not.
Back to the Depot and V.P. Biden, I think most of us felt it was time well spent. But it was tiring.
Well before the invocation opening the gathering, I struck up a conversation with a lady who was sitting on the floor near the media platform.
She was surprised that there were no chairs (it is the usual for these kinds of events).
At the same time, so far as I know she stayed till the end, and she was a supporter. It was just too tiring.
I ran into one fellow I knew and we had a good conversation about things political; and it is always interesting to just people watch at events like this. I become aware of how diverse the scrum is that goes by the name “Democrat” at such gatherings. (And you also notice people who are quite obviously not Democrat, but they are at such meetings for reasons of their own.)
In the long line before entering the old Depot, I got to thinking about the time in 1960-61 when I first came to Minneapolis, via the Soo Line, for a student union conference at the UofM Farm Campus in St. Paul. I was a college senior at the time, and I’d never been on a jaunt like this before. The bustle of the twin cities was new to me.
Where Joe Biden was speaking was where I and my fellow students had debarked from the train from Valley City ND over 50 years ago, sometime during the transition period from President Eisenhower to President Kennedy. A memory from that era is here: Politics 1960 vs 1996001
Things have really changed….

The line into the refurbished Milwaukee Road Depot August 21, 2012


There’s about two months till the election.
Get engaged.

Message t-shirt seen at the Joe Biden event


Portion of Milwaukee Road Route Map 1954, seen at the Hotel which now occupies the former Depot.


The old smokestacks from the days that the Depot welcomed coal-burning steam engines.

#607 – Dick Bernard: Election 2012 #36. Personal Responsibility

Thank you for stopping by.
Evidence is that an important Election is coming soon. The first lawn signs are sprouting along our streets. Important parts of local parades are political units supporting candidates. Etc.

July 11, 2012 Ramsey County Fair parade


The Minnesota Primary Election is next Tuesday, August 14. (Is there one in your town? Here’s where to start.)
Three months from now, Wednesday, November 7, 2012, we’ll wake up to the results of the 2012 election. We’ll learn our collective decision, as we do every two years. We’ll vote, informed or not, or we won’t vote at all, which is its own form of voting. (The word “decision” is not a passive one. Decide, suicide, homicide…there is a sense of finality with a decision.)
Political conversation is very difficult in our society. August 4, at a 50th wedding anniversary luncheon, I heard the following snip of conversation: “he won’t talk about politics or religion, but he’ll talk about anything else….”
I didn’t know them, or “he”, but I would completely disagree.
We live, at our peril, largely isolated from other points of view, even from next door neighbors. In many ways we’re involved in a deadly Civil War where for one to win, another must lose…and we’re all in the same country. We all lose.
Civil conversation and a sense of mutual responsibility and cooperation is essential for our society to thrive.
In the end, we’re individually accountable for the results whether we voted, informed or not, or didn’t vote at all Nov. 6. There is no “they” to blame. “They” is each and every one of us.
It is important work to really understand the candidates and the issues on which you’ll vote November 6.
Every individual needs to know the offices, the candidates and their positions on the issues; what they’ve ‘pledged’ to whomever; where their beliefs might get in the way of representing all of us…. This will take effort. Candidates cannot have personal conversations with everyone. Even in a single legislative district there are over 20,000 potential homes to visit. It cannot be done. But each of us have ways of reaching them…and noting if they respond, and how.
There are Forums; there are position papers. If the candidates are already in office, there are records.
We’re a very diverse society. No candidate can or should be expected to subscribe to each of our own views on everything. It is impossible. But we can discover if they are essentially owned by a particular constituency or bias. This does not work.
In my opinion, political advertising, ubiquitous and often obnoxious, is of zero value as far as “informing” is concerned. This will be especially bad the next three months. It is legal and it will not go away this fall. Mostly it will be targeted against, which isn’t productive. It is possible that as much as 2 1/2 billion dollars will be spent on election advertising this year alone. And that’s only for President of the United States. UPDATE Aug. 10: here’s a longer discussion of this issue of dishonesty in politics.
Each of us has within his or her power the ability to manage the impact of big and essentially anonymous money, much of it from hugely wealthy donors: refuse to fall for the lies.
As for the two constitutional amendments on the ballot in November: get to know what they mean, really. At minimum, think of the long-term implications of them for you and your family. Once passed, they’ll be almost impossible to reverse, which is a main reason for their being proposed.
Consider that both were passed with all votes from members of one party, and no affirmative votes from members of the other party in the state legislature. They by-passed the Governor. These are not innocuous “common sense” proposals. They have a very dark side, including for those who think they’d favor them.
Three months is not a long time.
You and I are the chief shareholders of this place called the United States of America, and we are the ones who will decide its direction three months from now.

Part of the Parade Community, Cottage Grove, June, 2012


NOTE TO READERS: I write frequently about political issues. Simply stop back once in awhile, and type Election 2012 in the search box, enter, and the list will come up, most recent first.
Directly related: here

Betty McCollum unit, New Brighton Stockyards Day Parade August 9 2012

#606 – Dick Bernard: Election 2012 #35. Speaking as a Liberal

In yesterday’s post about Hubert Humphrey, with a quotation from President Kennedy, I defined the word “liberal” from a liberals point of view.
I’m liberal, probably always have been, but as I said to the same friend who gave me the Kennedy quote yesterday, liberals, including myself, in many ways are the most conservative people I know. If you wanted a carefully run government, you’d not go wrong, on average, with a liberal in charge of things. We’re prudent and careful and caring.
Of course, there’s another long-time and carefully cultivated view of “liberals”.
For many years, there has been a concerted campaign to demonize the very word, ‘liberal’. It even predates Newt Gingrich’s famous 100 words which made their appearance in 1996 and have been flogged by the right wing ever since. “Liberal” joins other evil words like “unionized” and “taxes” and many other hate words on Gingrich’s list.
It is interesting to note that “conservative” does not appear on Gingrich’s good list. An oversight, perhaps?
The campaign has worked, but there are downsides to simply winning. There are costs.
A month or two ago a good friend gave me a copy of Rush Limbaugh’s magazine, in which Limbaugh (or whoever writes his stuff) took a shot at demonizing “liberals”.
I don’t have a problem sharing Limbaugh’s work, “Nailing the Left”. You can find it here: Limbaugh June 2012 Libs001
Of course, being Limbaugh, this piece of work lacks even the tiniest sense of objectivity (it is not, shall we say, “fair and balanced”.)
But it helps explain how some otherwise fine folks I know go almost hysterical when considering even the possibility that “liberals” might possibly become a governing majority.
Of course, I’ve read Limbaugh’s rant, but I read it a tiny bit differently than he intended.
Doubtless in each of the examples he uses, one can find abuse – an awful example used to exemplify the lot. I’ve seen this tactic over and over.
But on balance, each and every one of those items, and many others which Limbaugh doesn’t even mention, are good policies which have made this nation a much better place.
I don’t see in that list, for instance, Social Security. Likely a pretty fair share of Limbaugh’s loyal base, and subscribers to his newsletter, are on Social Security, and hardly would consider it a ‘liberal’ program, though it would not exist were it not for liberals. Of course, there’s a move to dismantle Social Security, but only for the next generation….
But why bother arguing? There’s no need for consistency in making arguments to people who have already made up their mind.
To paraphrase Fox News: “I report, you decide.”
I’m liberal, and proud of it.
Related, here.
For other politics related blogposts simply enter election 2012 in the search box and click enter.

#603 – Dick Bernard: End of a week after the Aurora massacre during Dark Knight Rises. Part Three

When I awoke last Friday morning, and saw the first news of the carnage at the movie theatre in Aurora CO, the first thing that came to mind was the horror at Columbine High School in 1999. It became the basis for my post one week ago today.
As I write media is beginning to go silent on the tragedy at Aurora. Over at the Eagan Patch non-scientific online poll, the number favoring no gun control still dominates, but the percentage has hardly changed since the beginning. The thread of comments seems to be ending, but the emphasis has seldom been the tragedy inside the theater, rather the unfettered right to have guns*.
So we live.
Monday, mostly out of curiosity, I went to Dark Knight Rises at the Woodbury Theatre. The film isn’t my normal fare, but I felt it was well done, deserving its four stars (highest rating).

Woodbury Theatre July 22, 2012


The film kept attentive a fairly full Woodbury theatre audience of teens and adults, and it had strong take-away messages for anyone caring to ponder such things as good and evil.
There were no armed guards at the theatre, or unusual precautions I could notice. Staff were polite as always. Going to the Woodbury Theatre is always a pleasant experience.
In the theatre, I would guess that most of us were thinking about what happened a few days earlier in Colorado.
I certainly noticed my own feelings at the approximate half-hour mark, the point in the movie when the carnage took place in Aurora.
It was heart-warming to notice a couple of days later that Batman himself, Christian Bale, had showed up at the hospital in Aurora. It is hardly worth being shot to meet a movie star, and President Obama came to Aurora as well, but the in-person presence was a nice touch nonetheless.
Of course, death is something we all live with. Aurora was only a spike.
Out of curiosity I looked up death statistics.
On a normal day in the United States, nearly 7,000 people die. About 100 of these die in automobiles; perhaps 25 or so die in shootings; twice as many die through gun accidents or suicide with a gun; (far more are injured and terrorized in these shootings.)
World-wide, that Friday in July, 2012, about 156,000 people died from all causes.
So, should we even care about a few wasted lives in that movie theater in suburban Denver?
Yes, we should.
They are unnecessary deaths, due strictly to allowing someone “freedom” and “liberty” – “the right” – to purchase and then use deadly weapons to take away others freedom and liberty.
The thread of the community newspaper poll went on. The most recent comment count I have is nearing 300.
Monday, at 11:16 a.m. I entered my second and last personal response to the thread:
“I’ve followed this thread since almost the beginning – my computer says 163 posts so far. I wonder how many have experienced the reality of guns person-against-person. It makes a big difference. When I filled in the questionnaire which brought me here, I marked ‘sometimes’. In my comment, I said I qualified as expert marksman in the Army, but I have never owned a firearm and don’t intend to.
I was in the Army 1962-63. Volunteered for the Draft (ever fewer know what that is). Turned out I was assigned to an Infantry Company in a newly reactivated Infantry Division preparing for duty in a place that was abstract to most of us – Vietnam. We played a lot of war in my two years, up close and personal, with real primitive M-1 rifles (blank ammo), bayonet training, and the like. We crawled under barbed wire under a fusillade of machine gun fire. We experienced tear gas. We did maneuvers in several states.
Even playing war was dead serious. You found out it wasn’t a video game or a theory. You could get killed more easily than you could kill. Having a gun, and doing target practice isn’t the real deal, rest assured. In the chaos of that theater on Friday night, the worst thing to happen would have been a gunslingers duel. My opinion: authorize everyone to have a machete, and banish guns, period. Yes, a fantasy. But makes more sense than assault weapons on every corner. And check out “On Killing” by David Grossman on Amazon. Somebody earlier referred to him.”
There were no responses on-line, but the conversation continued on other topics.
Maybe it’s a good time to review Columbine and that movie the gun-folks love to hate: Bowling for Columbine. It’s free for viewing on-line, here. And here’s Michael Moore on the issue. He’s paid his dues.
If my math is correct, since Columbine there have been over 100,000 violent person-against-person gun deaths in the United States.
If you think policy makers need to pay attention to our being awash in deadly weapons, don’t go silent, as the news media leaves Aurora for the next deal. Stay with it. The Brady Campaign is a good ongoing resource.
Gandhi had it right: “we must be the change we wish to see in the world”.

* – Here’s the last comment on the Patch poll, at least by 11:15 p.m. Thursday, July 26.
Carol Turnbull: “This is from An Arms Race We Can’t Win, one of the links posted above, for those who didn’t bother to check it out: “The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence has compiled a 62-page list of mass shootings since 2005. What’s striking is that there isn’t a single example of a concerned bystander with a concealed-carry permit who stopped a mass shooting… “We’re also excessively pessimistic about our ability to control firearms in the United States. Since 9/11, federal officials have done an excellent job of restricting the fertilizers and chemicals required to produce homemade explosives.””

#599 – Dick Bernard: Thoughts in the immediate wake of Aurora CO

UPDATE: Followup posts here and here.
Out and about this afternoon I noticed that Dark Knight Rises is playing at our local Woodbury Theatre, and the parking lot was packed. What these two facts might mean, I don’t know. The front page of the Variety section of this mornings Minneapolis Star Tribune gave the film Four Stars (out of four). This places the STrib in an awkward position this afternoon.
One has no doubt what the lead story on tonights news – all channels – will be. It is yet another tragedy, certainly not the first, and as certainly not the last in this comfortable-with-violence country of ours.
Waking to the breaking news this morning caused me to think back to an afternoon on April 20, 1999.
I was returning to St. Paul from a day-long meeting in Brooklyn Park, and along I-94 somewhere heard the announcement about school shootings in Littleton CO.
This elevated my concerns. My son and family had lived in Littleton for more than ten years, and Lindsay, my granddaughter, was 12 and in a Littleton school.
Those were the days before cell phones, and I couldn’t make contact till I got back to my office. There was an e-mail. All was okay with our family.
I learned the school was Columbine, which didn’t relate to me since no one had mentioned it before. I looked it up on the then fledgling version of mapquest, and found its location, which was misplaced on the computer map.
Turned out Columbine high school was about a mile straight east of where my kin lived, and Lindsay’s school was in a different attendance area in the massive Jefferson County Public Schools.
About a week later I was in Littleton – it had been a previously planned trip – and together we hiked up “Cross Hill” in the rain, and with hundreds of others, including pastor Robert Schuller of the Crystal Cathedral and his film crew, silently remembering and witnessing. Cross Hill was simply a pile of construction dirt, but it did overlook Columbine just a little to the east. It had its own controversy. The builder created and planted the crosses to each of the victims of the massacre at Columbine, including crosses to the killers, who had committed suicide after the deed. Someone else had come in and cut down those two other crosses….
Such is how grief works its way through, and in one way or another it will play out this way in the latest tragedy.
(It turned out that last night Lindsay, now married and living in the same neighborhood as in 1999, was at the midnight opening of Dark Knight Rises, but at another theater 20 miles away from Aurora.)
One never knows.
In the wake of Columbine I dug out an old handout from some workshop I had attended back in the early 1970s. It was one of those pieces of paper that seemed to be worth keeping, and I have kept it in its original somewhat primitive condition. A psychologist used the graphic to walk us through the stages of response to Crisis situations we might face.
(click to enlarge)

The stages in essence, and their approximate duration, are these:
IMPACT – Hours
RECOIL-TURMOIL – Days
ADJUSTMENT – Weeks
RECONSTRUCTION – Months
This is what “normal” response to a crisis looked like to some psychologist in 1972.
How will this latest tragedy be dealt with? How will it be used? The following days and weeks will tell the tale.
A good friend, a retired prosecutor in a major city, sent an e-mail this afternoon with an observation which occurred to him: “Every mass shooting in the United States has not occurred in a large city. They have all occurred either in rural areas, such as the Red Lake Reservation school shooting, or in suburbs such as Littleton (Columbine high School) or Aurora Colorado and the school in a small town outside of Cleveland, for example. What does that prove, what does that mean? I have no idea. Nor have I read of any analysis of this phenomenon, and I have searched for one/some.”
May we all seek non-violence as a solution to our problems.
UPDATES:
From Will:
1. Every time there is a national tragedy, every American wants the world to know where (s)he was and what (s)he was doing.
2. Are you saying, with no proof, that this film provoked the shooting? What if the theater had been showing a religious film and a shooting still took place?
3. Are you saying or suggesting we must start censoring, even banning films on the basis of their likelihood to provoke shootings? ACLU and CCR will come after you with both barrels!
4. If you believe Congress needs to pass stronger gun laws, use your computer skills and tell us which Congresspeople still in office received donations and in what amount from the NRA over the past five years and put it on your blog.
5. Write a letter to Sens. Franken and Klobuchar and your Congressperson—it’s Bachmann, isn’t it?—with your specific ideas on tightening gun controls.
Copy the NRA.
Response to Will from Dick:
1. Certainly, and why not? The only difference between now and 50 years ago is that most all of us can instantly communicate with most everyone anywhere.
2. No
3. No
4. Yes, member of Brady Campaign already, but not inclined to push my weight around in a blog. According to Brady Campaign, this year we already have over 54,000 gun-related deaths in the U.S. and we’re only halfway through 2012. We are awash in weaponry, but to even think about voting for some kind of gun-control is, at this moment, a political death sentence. The public does have to make a difference.
5. See #4. But the odds of any candidate for office actively pursuing gun control four months before the 2012 election are essentially zero. Groups like Brady Campaign know that, but I’m sure they are fully capable of thinking longer term.
There might be one or two that have some thoughts as a result of my blog. That’s all I can expect. It is pertinent and timely.
From Greg:
As it looks now, Friday evening, evidence points to serious mental illness on the part of the shooter.
Serious psychoses typically begin growing small during childhood/high school years, then burgeoning during college/graduate school.
The man is undeniably bright. Eventually we will learn whether he voluntarily dropped out of graduate school or whether the University asked him to leave. We will learn what his professors thought of him, and whether they saw similarities with the Virginia Tech shooter. What did the professors/ administration do to bring this man to the attention of the county mental health authorities? Keep in mind also that Colorado as with many other states is facing budget shortfalls. Mental health services historically are among the first government expenditures to be cut. Reason: There is just no natural lobby to press the legislature to retain funding. Compare mental health services with funding for highway construction, school aid, etc.
The mother of the young St Louis Park man who shot and killed two convenience store clerks was quoted in a newspaper article saying she knew her son had severe mental health problems but was unable to get medical care for him. Everyone will be abuzz for a week or two about this man, then something else will come up. A new legislature will be elected in Colorado November 6th. There will be other more pressing issues with which to deal. There may be some talk about this tragedy but basically nothing will be done. It will be yesterday’s news by then.
Someone who knows him was said to have described him as a loner, another indicator of mental illness.
Saw his father on cable tonight boarding a flight in San Diego for Denver. Got the quick impression the father is well educated and perhaps upper income class.
If this is even close to being true, what efforts did the father make to lead his son to mental health treatment? This is a major flaw in our society, that parents have no legal obligation to notify police their adult child is mentally ill, receiving no treatment and just may be dangerous
If a parent knows this to be true yet does nothing to warn authorities that parent faces no legal liability, civil or criminal if the adult child then shoots up a theater. Moral responsibility yes, but no civil or criminal responsibility.
Back to the shooter, look at his photo being shown on TV. Is that his booking photo taken after his post shooting arrest? The almost smirk he seems to have; another indicator of possible mental illness.
Now, a person can be seriously mentally ill but not have an insanity defense to criminal charges. Insanity is but one type of mental illness. Each state has its own definition of what constitutes insanity. In the days ahead we will learn what the Colorado standard is.
Look at the planning that went into this attack. Tonight we learned he had about 6000 rounds of ammunition for the four weapons he possessed. He wore an elaborate costume with protective gear. He had to make an effort to purchase all of that. Then he booby trapped his apartment. From the preliminary description we have of the apartment he must have spent quite some time and effort to purchase the materials with which he constructed the booby trap. The prosecution will argue the booby trapping effort is further evidence he understood the difference between right and wrong and constructed the booby traps as a way of avoiding capture.
from Carol: OK, a little bit miffed here at some responses. While I have due respect for prosecuting attorneys (retired or otherwise), I take exception to Greg’s trying to blame the parents. He wrote: “Got the quick impression the father is well educated and perhaps upper income class. If this is even close to being true, what efforts did the father make to lead his son to mental health treatment? This is a major flaw in our society, that parents have no legal obligation to notify police their adult child is mentally ill, receiving no treatment and just may be dangerous…”
If, of course, the parents were divorced – the father abusive, alcoholic or whatever – then they would get blamed for THAT. From all indications, in high school and so on this kid was not any weirder than his peers. He is legally an adult. His parents may, or may not, have made efforts to “lead” him to treatment, but they couldn’t force him. Greg wants what to change, exactly? What is the age cutoff where he thinks a parent should be “legally obligated” to notify authorities that their “adult child” may be mentally ill? 25? 35? 50? How about a child who is in school, working, married, living in another state – possibly has cut off contact? Should the parents be legally obligated to force themselves into his or her life?
And what exactly does he think the police are going to do with that information? Even this kid’s apartment mates didn’t know he was collecting an arsenal, boobytrapping his apartment, and risking all their lives. If the police ran around checking on every adult child who the parents fear may be mentally unstable, they wouldn’t get anything else done.
Those who have daily contact with an individual are the best assessors. And in this case, you have the sinking feeling that there was very little to set off alarms.
It does seem the best indicator should have been that someone who in a short period of time bought several weapons, a ton of ammunition, complete bulletproof clothing, plus chemicals and bomb-making materials was in deep trouble, and should have been on the police radar. But we can’t have any coordinated database of this kind of thing, of course. That infringes on our civil rights – having our kids shot in a crowded theatre does not.

#597 – Dick Bernard: Election 2012 #32. Writing Letters and Columns

I am reading less and less newsprint, including the e-mail types of news which compile the news of the day from one particular point of view. Usually these days I tend to find myself skipping over the ‘same old, same old’ spin (the word ‘pundit’ comes to mind), and paying more attention to letters to the editor and columns by unusual suspects.
Still, we subscribe to the Minneapolis Star Tribune, and to the Woodbury Bulletin, and are happy to incur the expense.
Todays blog is occasioned by todays (July 17) “Readers Write” in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, particularly the Letter of the Day about the Voter Suppression Amendment. Also I spent some time with the column by Dennis Carstens on the facing page.
Both richly deserve responses (to me, they prove the opposite of what they are contending), but I won’t write letters of response.
Why.
Because I know the rules of the road. I recently had a Letter of the Day in the same paper; and it seems I get a column maybe every six months or so. I would be wasting words in response.
But that’s why I’m commenting here.
I know a fair number of people who are quite regular contributors to opinion pages in both metro and local newspapers.
They basically share some traits: they have a thoughtful point of view, they articulate well, and do it briefly. They are better writers than I. More practiced. But, nonetheless, I get published once in awhile.
On this blog column, my number counter says I’m at 262 words.
Usually letters to the editor are limited to 150-250 words (the commentary page will define the terms for the particular newspaper.
Columns are usually under 600 words, 700 max.
If you’re an ordinary person, like I am, you pay close attention to these rules because they are arbitrary and you have no control over them.
If it says 600 maximum, that’s what it means.
The only way to get published is to submit letters or commentaries.
Most will get rejected. Consider it practice.
Forty years ago I heard Alex Haley (“Roots”) give a long and fascinating talk about not only writing the book, but his early history as a writer.
Succinctly, practice, submit, reject, practice….
It took a number of years to become famous.
I won’t be, but I keep at it.
How about you?
390 words.

#584 – Lee Dechert in his own words

UPDATE June 26, 2012: Here is the obituary on Lee Dechert.
NOTE: Comments on Lee from Andy Driscoll and Will Shapira can be found at the very end of this post. There may be others, later.
Richard Lee Dechert (that’s as in French: pronounced d-share) passed away quietly at home on June 21. Years ago I heard a man eulogized as follows: “he lived before he died; he died before he was finished”. This would fit Lee Dechert who passed away June 21, 2012, in St. Paul.
There will be a formal obituary in the metro newspapers shortly. I am thinking that Lee would want his own words, which follow, passed along as well.
Every one who knew Lee, knew that his death was imminent. The cancer finally had its way. He was quietly eloquent about the progress of the disease and other ailments. They were simply part of his life as he lived it.
Lee (the only name I had for him) died with uncommon grace. May 17 I gave him a ride to (as far as I know) his final outside event, the Third Thursday program of Citizens for Global Solutions. Also in the car that night was the speaker for the evening, Pat Hamilton of the Science Museum of Minnesota. There are a couple of photos from that final outing for Lee at the end of this post.
My knowledge of Lee came from attendance at meetings with him, and occasional visits when I gave him a ride home. There were bits and pieces shared: his Air Force service in the 1950s, including a visit to Haiti; going to the University; his great pride in his daughter, son-in-law and then grandson; his love for his sister; sometimes a little talk about the illness, but never much. I gathered he was divorced, but we didn’t talk much about that, and when that was a brief topic, there was no sense of bitterness. Things apparently just didn’t work out. It seemed there was a continuing relationship of some sort.
At home I would hear from Lee from time to time. When I knew that his death was soon approaching, I consciously began to keep his e-mails. There were perhaps 15 of them in all. From those 15 I’ve decided to include several which articulated Lee’s passions and history. I’ve left the contents exactly as received. They are Lee talking, not me. I noted my computer spell check found nothing. Lee was meticulous.
This is a very long post. The counter says 4068 words. At minimum, scroll through….
If you knew Lee, you’ll want to read on. (Click to enlarge the photos which, except for the final one, came from Lee Dechert.)

Lee, daughter Sabrina, son Luc, Son-in-Law Marco and Jim Pagliarini, President of TPT Channel 2 December 20, 2011


About TPTs Almanac Program April 4, 2012. Lee honored us by having us as audience stand-ins for him at Almanac May 11, 2012.
As Caitlin Mussmann says, you’re “go” for the show. Some background: Now approaching its 28th year, Almanac is the longest running (and most successful) local news and public affairs magazine in PBS history, and is a “must appear” venue for any aspiring candidate of a major federal, state or municipal office. Its co-creators, Bill Hanley and Brendan Henehan, are still senior staffers. Brendan is Almanac’s Executive Producer, and you’ll likely see him in the Control Room with longtime Associate Producer Kari Kennedy and longtime Director Jeff Weihe. Other members of the show’s crack production crew have been there 15 to 20 years or more. The late Judge Joe Summers was the first Co-Host along with Jan Smaby. In the 1960’s I knew Joe as a DFL activist, and I knew Jan as a teenager at my and my wife’s Lutheran parish near the U. of M. campus.
Under Bill’s leadership as Vice-President of Minnesota Productions, tpt launched the part-time local, digital Minnesota Channel (now MN Channel) 10 years ago. In 2006 it became the nationally acclaimed 24/7 statewide service it is now, with a groundbreaking business plan of co-producing or co-presenting a rich array of programs with local, state and regional non-profit organizations, and providing seed grants for low-income producers. Brendan is also the Executive Producer for the MN Channel’s public affairs programs. A major off-shoot of Almanac is Almanac: At the Capitol, created in 2006 with Kari as its Producer and Mary Lahammer as its Host. David Gillette became its Special Correspondent in 2010. Mary and David also report or commentate on Almanac. A major off-shoot of the MN Channel is the superb MN Original arts series that was launched in 2010 with funding from the State Legacy Amendment. Over the years Minnesota Productions has created a multitude of award-winning programs.
As you may recall Dick, then KTCA-TV operated from its Como Ave. studios near the State Fairgrounds. In 1988 it moved to the newly constructed Telecenter next to the St. Paul Union Depot on Fourth St., and became digital tpt in 2002. I started in the Member and Viewer Services unit in November 1991 and retired in May 2007; I had major throat surgery in June. Working with the public entailed working with staffers in every station unit, and I was blessed to be there when we began our fascinating transition from analog to multi-channel digital programming that culminated in 2006. With Governor Ventura presiding, in 1997 [1999? Ventura was elected in 1998] Minnesota’s first broadcast digital signal was switched on at the State Capitol; it subsequently led the state in a series of digital firsts. With the Governor was Jim Pagliarini who became the station’s President & CEO in 2007. Under his leadership tpt has remained one of the “gems” of the Public Broadcasting Service.
In 1982 my sister Bobbie, who died from cancer in October 2008, served as an MCAD arts intern at the station. In 1983 I, my wife Ann and daughter Sabrina were in the audience for the second-ever live filming of the half-hour Newton’s Apple show that aired on PBS until 1998. In 2006 Sabrina returned from Paris and opened her first stained-glass studio overlooking the Farmers Market from the Northwestern Building, a block on Fourth Street from the Depot and two blocks from tpt. Last December Sabrina, Marc-Antoine and little Luc took the James J. Hill Empire Builder from Seattle to St. Paul. And as the attached photos indicate, on December 20 Luc met some of my tpt associates who were thrilled to see him.
That is Luc, Marc-Antoine and I beneath the Almanac banner at the Lobby entrance; Luc, Sabrina and I before the Minnesota: A history of the land graphic in the Lobby; and the four of us with Jim Pagliarini at the station’s “Wall of Fame” across from Studio A. On the “Blenko Buddies” date Sabrina, Marc-Antoine (Marco) and I attended a special Studio A wine and cheese event for a Blenko Glass Company pledge show. On 8/2/07 Bobbie and I attended the station’s 50th Anniversary Alumni and Staff Party, and on 5/29/09 Bobbie’s partner John Sherrell met his friend Cathy Wurzer when he and I watched Almanac in Studio B and the Control Room much as you and your wife will. In her office my former manager Margaret took the photo of four-months old Luc checking his first gift from “Santa” (via me), a furry Minnesota Wood Duck. She also took our “Wall of Fame” photos.
If you wish, ask one of the Almanac crew for a marker to place your names and date on the massive “Wall” that graphically represents over 50 years of political and cultural history in Minnesota; First Lady Hillary Clinton is also on it. Before you leave also take a few minutes to review the station’s history at the hallway entrance to the studios. I’ll be there in spirit.

At TPT, December 20, 2011 photo received from Lee Dechert April 2012


On his own family history and Politics: (August 26, 2009)
Along with Ann, I was a DFL State Convention delegate supporting A.M. “Sandy” Keith for Governor of Minnesota* when young and handsome Ted Kennedy, escorted by Irish bagpipers, delivered a stirring address on behalf of the party at the State Capitol Mall Armory in the summer of 1966. That was less than three years after his brother John’s death and he was treated with great reverence.
Ted and I were both born in 1932 a few months before FDR was elected in the depths of the Great Depression. My grandfather Everett, who married and lived with Nanny Kennedy in southern Ontario, and who died about a year after Uncle Lloyd was born in 1908 and mother was born in 1910, was a Scotch-Irish Kennedy whose clan history Bobbi traced when she journeyed through the British Isles in the 1990s. [Lee specifically noted that his Kennedy line was not part of that other Kennedy line!]
I still have the fine clan scarf she gave me, and wear it when I attend the St. Patrick’s Day Parade in St. Paul. It marches down 4th Street past the historic James J. Hill Northwestern Building where Sabrina had her stained-glass studio, and Twin Cities Public Television where Bobbi and I attended the 50th Anniversary Alumni and Staff Party on August 2, 2007. In 2008 Sabrina and I watched the Parade on a cold, windy March 17.
As I’ve mentioned before, when I hear those bagpipes and drums and see those magnificent uniforms, I always think of the Essex Scottish Regiment when it paraded through Great Grandmother Nanny Kiff’s Ontario village of Harrow to celebrate Dominion Day in the late 1930s and early 1940s. Grandfather Everett was a member of that Regiment and received one of the highest medals of the British Crown for his bravery in South Africa’s Boer War.
Long live the Kennedys! Long live “The Lion of the Senate”!
*”Sandy” lost the DFL nomination to incumbent DFL Governor Karl Rolvaag in a historic 21-ballot battle that lasted two days, lost the primary election, but went on to become a distinguished Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court. Our efforts were not wasted.
My Contribution to the Peace and Justice Community October 18, 2011. (Included here, Lee lays out the medical situation he was facing.)
[See] “Global Warming, Climate Chaos and Human Conflict” [here]. The initial text concludes by saying:
“CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions have raised the mean global temperature by 0.8 degrees Celsius since 1900, and 0.6 more has been locked in by climate system inertia. With the temperature continuing to rise about 0.2 degrees a decade since 1990—and with the U.S. and other Accord nations not doing enough to reverse the rise or adapt to it—the 1.5 and 2.0 limits will likely be exceeded well before 2050,[13-16,19] and the chaotic impacts of human-induced global warming will become the paramount issue of the 21st century.[6-9,20-23]
“Rampant conflict within and between nations is one of those impacts. Yet many U.S. ‘peace and justice’ organizations have not embraced a climate chaos agenda that could prevent or reduce the conflict. The APPENDIX of 26 conflict reports shows why such an agenda must be a key part of every organization’s actions. Moreover, because decades of human-induced global warming are locked into our planet’s climate system,[5] that agenda should primarily focus on implementing measures that will enable populations in our nation and other nations to adapt as best as they can to increasing climate chaos.[24]”
Dick, unless there were signs protesting the CO2 that was streaming from the tail pipes of the passing vehicles, “a climate chaos agenda” was not “a key part” of the Lake Street agenda. So I regard such
“peace and justice” protests as largely treating the symptoms of worldwide
“human conflict” rather than its underlying
“global warming” causes in which too many people are vying for too few resources in an increasingly hostile environment.
I just returned from a four-day visit with my sister, her partner and my nephew in the Rocky Mountains above Denver. I told them that the carcinomoid form of renal cell cancer that began in my surgically removed right kidney has metastasized to my lungs, is inoperable, can’t be treated with radiation therapy, and is usually fatal in less than a year with or without chemotherapy. Today I’ll have a third set of MRI and CT scans to determine how much the tiny “nodules” in my lungs have increased, and tomorrow I’ll meet with my oncologist to decide on initiating chemotherapy or palliative care. I’ll then inform my daughter and her husband in Seattle where I was the first family member to see and hold Luc two days after he was born.
If I’m able to attend Thursday’s Forum, I’ll distribute printouts of my piece. I hope to see you there.
Honduras Constitutional Crisis: A Proper Resolution (August 28, 2009)
I’ve reviewed over 500 reports and opinion pieces on the crisis from a wide range of sources and perspectives. In my judgment Honduras’ Supreme Court–supported by the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, Attorney General and democratically elected National Congress–had strong “probable cause” to arrest and detain President Manuel Zelaya for abuses of office and other crimes.
As prescribed by Honduras’ Constitution, President of Congress Roberto Micheletti (and leader of Zelaya’s Liberal Party) was selected to replace him (by a nearly unanimous 122 to 6 vote) as the interim President only until the November 2009 national elections are held and his term ends in January 2010.
However, Zelaya’s right to defend himself in a due-process proceeding was circumvented when military officers responsible for executing the Supreme Court’s order to arrest and detain him violated the order (and the statute that prohibits extradition of Honduran citizens) by forcibly expelling him to Costa Rica.
Since then the Supreme Court has ruled that Zelaya’s interim replacement by Micheletti was Constitutional and its order to arrest and detain him must be enforced.
Unfortunately if not tragically, the officers’ illegal expulsion has been erroneously conflated with the Court’s legal order, and both have been branded as a “military coup.”
Therefore, instead of circumventing that order by arbitrarily restoring him to the Presidency as the US-supported OAS Resolution demands and Oscar Arias’ San José Accord proposes, Zelaya should agree to return to Honduras and be duly adjudicated for his alleged treason, abuses of office and other crimes. Only then can his guilt or innocence be legally established and Honduras’ Constitutional crisis be properly resolved.
In addition the officers who expelled him should be duly adjudicated along with pro-Micheletti and pro-Zelaya forces who have violated the civil and human rights of Honduran citizens and foreign nationals. If Micheletti’s interim government does not curtail violations by army, police and other pro-Micheletti forces, even stronger economic and diplomatic sanctions should be applied by the US, OAS, UN and other international actors. Pro-Zelaya forces must also curtail their violations.
Moreover, Venezuela (supported by Cuba, Nicaragua and others) must end the blatant intervention in Honduras’ internal affairs that has exacerbated the crisis and violated the OAS and UN Charters.
In short, ALL parties to the crisis must resolve it by honoring the rule of law, not just the ones we may ideologically or politically favor.
Global Warming, Climate Chaos and the 2012 Minnesota Legislative Session (January 26, 2012)
As I’ve noted before, because of our climate system’s inertia in reacting to human-generated greenhouse gases, our state and the rest of our planet are locked into decades of chaotic global warming–even if all emissions were halted today. As I’ve also noted before, shaping government actions at state and local levels is crucial in adapting to warming impacts that include more frequent and extreme weather events in Minnesota and the Upper Midwest region.
As best as I can I’ll monitor the 2012 session, and if possible testify in behalf of legislation that will enable our state to better adapt to the chaos. I no longer use the term “climate change”; for urgent, effective adaptation it’s clearly outdated.
For those who wish to monitor the 2012 legislature, daily sessions are broadcast and streamed via the statewide Minnesota Channel (TPT-2 in the Twin Cities); e-mailed schedules are available from the House and Senate media services and from key committees; and daily reports are available from the the Minnesota Environmental Partnership (below) and Midwest Energy News; the latter also has regional and national reports; both can be Googled.
Regarding another warm environment, many thanks to the Board members who attended the delightful luncheon at the Olive Garden, and those who couldn’t attend but sent their best wishes.
RLD
======
Hopes for 2012 Legislative Session: Jobs and the environment, together
by Steve Morse, Minnesota Environmental Partnership [a former state legislator]
The 2012 Legislative Session kicks off this week!
While it’s anticipated that this session will focus on bonding, the Vikings stadium, and various constitutional amendments, important environmental issues will still be part of the policy discussion.
As legislators return to the state Capitol, we urge them to remember that policies that affect our water, clean energy future, and Great Outdoors are vitally important to Minnesota voters – regardless of political party affiliation.
In fact, a 2012 poll* of Minnesota voters found that the majority of voters do not believe that we have to choose between helping the economy vs. protecting our environment. A whopping 79% of voters polled said we can have a clean environment and a strong economy at the same time without having to choose one over the other.
Join us and tell your legislators and Governor Dayton that choosing the economy over the environment is a false choice – Minnesotans want and deserve both.
Having a strong economy and a healthy environment together will make Minnesota better today and for generations to come.
*From a statewide telephone poll of 500 registered Minnesota voters, conducted Jan. 9-11, 2012, for the Minnesota Environmental Partnership by the bipartisan research team of Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates and Public Opinion Strategies. The margin of sampling error for the full statewide samples is 4.4 percentage points, plus or minus; margins of error for subgroups within the sample will be larger.
Precinct Caucuses (February 1, 2012)
I’ll be the convener for my DFL precinct caucus in District 55A (partly Maplewood and North St. Paul). I’ll try to have my global-warming resolution passed and become a delegate to the District 55 Senate Convention where the resolution can be further discussed and hopefully passed on to the DFL State Convention.
I attended my first Maplewood precinct caucus with my wife Ann in 1966. We became delegates to the historic 20-ballot DFL State Convention at the Leamington Hotel in Minneapolis where A.M. “Sandy” Keith prevailed over Gov. Karl Rolvaag, but was defeated in a bitter primary election. Rolvaag was reelected and several years later “Sandy” was appointed to the State Supreme Court and became one of its finest Chief Justices.
I was also the titular campaign chairman, a lead organizer, and media publicist for a Catholic middle-school teacher in the Maplewood-North St. Paul School District by the name of Jerome “Jerry” Hughes. He upset a longtime GOP Sen. Les Westin, eventually became Chairman of the Senate Education Committee, received a Ph.D., authored groundbreaking early-education legislation, and spent the final years of a distinguished 28-year career as President of the Senate. I coined the campaign battle cry of “Less Westin and More Hughes!” It worked.
In 1968 my wife and I were delegates to the even more historic and divisive DFL State Convention at a St. Paul venue I don’t recall where Sen. Hubert Humphrey prevailed over Sen. Gene McCarthy. I was an anti-Vietnam War pro-Humphrey delegate and the District 50A Vice-Chairman. Our district was one of two in the entire Twin Cities region that sent Humphrey delegates to the ill-fated Democratic National Convention in Chicago. I received a personal letter of appreciation from Hubert, and he later autographed my book on “Midwestern Progressive Politics” at the Leamington.
That premier hotel where many historical events were held and guests like Richard Nixon, Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey and Duke Ellington stayed was demolished in 1990. Much of the site is a parking ramp for Orchestra Hall. I think of those 1960’s
events every time I attend a concert at
the Hall.
Here We Go Again…More Rollbacks for Environmental Protections (February 27, 2012)

As many of you may know, in the 2011 Minnesota legislative session the GOP-controlled House and Senate passed bills that repealed much of our state’s progressive environmental legislation—including laws that limit greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants and prohibit construction of new plants. Except for one relatively minor bill, Gov. Dayton vetoed them. This session they’re taking a different tack by passing bills that repeal state environmental rules and regulations—then require them to be submitted for approval by the legislature before state agencies can enforce them. Minnesota Environmental Partnership Executive Director (and former state senator) Steve Morse further explains that in his linked Loon Commons message and brief video. It is a major assault on public health and safety that’s occurring or has occurred in other states where the GOP controls the legislative process. It is similarly occurring in the U.S. House with the EPA and other federal agencies.
I hope our Chapter will join with other organizations in sending a letter opposing these bills to their authors and Gov. Dayton. I’m still available to assist in doing that.
Offer to include a link of Lee’s at AMillionCopies.Info (February 26, 2012)

Dick, thanks for your offer! As we know, without a livable environment there will be no lasting peace. The United Nations Environment Programme (note the spelling) is perfect for your page. UNEP is celebrating its 40th birthday and on June 5, 2012 it will celebrate World Environment Day. Its Website is a treasure trove of information. I would place its link directly below the CGS link. RLD
Finally, I noted four of my blogposts where Lee ‘appeared’, usually with a comment at the end of the post. They can be accessed here.

Luc, December 20, 2011, from Lee April 4, 2012


Lee, Sabrina and Luc at TPT, December 20, 2011, from Lee April 4, 2012


Photo taken Dec. 20, 2011, from Lee Dechert April 4, 2012


Andy Driscoll, June 22, 2012;
Well, now this calls for a short essay, which I’ll spare you right now. But, Lee Dechert was one of the smartest, most contradictory people I’ve ever known – not that being progressive and contradictory are necessarily mutually exclusive. He could be both, in series and in parallel.
This retiree from Channel 2, tpt, was ever critical of his colleagues for being in bed with corporations but who would defend to the death the institution’s value to the community and its viewers, even in retrospect. He was, for a progressive, immensely critical (if not totally accurate in his facts) of the RNC anarchists and journalists who goaded law enforcement into overreaction rather than place responsibility for restraint on the over-armed and over-armored former that confronted dissenters in the streets and were more violent than any of the protesters could possibly have been, putting property above person.
But Lee defended all of it, insisting that the aim of disrupting a constitutionally assembled convention was not theirs – the dissenters – to pursue. Certainly not with any sort of violence in their plan. And he let me know same in many an email and in no uncertain terms.
Lee was a great advocate of new technologies in the media while being an old-fashioned moralist himself and a critic of the direction mainstream media was taking – or ignoring – at our constitutional peril.
He could be one’s best friend one minute, grinning and praising and tearing you a new one the next, depending on the topic. But he never really held a grudge for the same reason.
I knew him not at all, despite these observations, but knew that he cared more for at least one of his sister’s health than his own during the days we worked together on the Media Reform Conference in Minneapolis.
And the hits just kept on coming. He was an excellent writer – off the cuff and after much work. Whether or not his reasoning coincided with the prevailing convention, it was ever his own, today a maverick, tomorrow a laissez-faire defender.
He will be missed – and remembered for all of that and more, and I heap my condolences on his family and friends.
Andy Driscoll
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Andy Driscoll, Producer/Host,
TruthToTell – KFAI FM 90.3/106.7
Will Shapira, June 22, 2012
He was one of my best friends from Ch. 2-17 days and will be greatly missed by all.
He faced death more bravely than anyone I’ve ever known.
All Detroit sports teams should fly their flags at half mast.

My last photo of Lee, May 17, 2012, at Citizens for Global Solutions Third Thursday program featuring Dr. Pat Hamilton.


May 17, 2012

#575 – Dick Bernard: Election 2012 #20. A History of "Decisive" Battles in Warfare

Today is election day in Wisconsin; five months from today is the United States General Election.
There is a serious question embedded in the following: how do we change American political warfare before we are all – winners and losers and, indeed, country – lying dead in the weeds?
The past couple of generations of Republican politics, more or less 40 years, perfected by people like Lee Atwater and Karl Rove and their many disciples, has been based on principles of Warfare. Negative emotions of people, as fear and loathing, are harnessed and used as the bullets to kill the opposition. Now unlimited and almost totally unregulated money has entered the conversation. Somehow the following commentary seems most appropriate for today, the day Wisconsin decides. I keep thinking of two books….
For some years my bookshelf has held two old books I found some years ago in a box at my Grandparents North Dakota farm.
Both have copyrights of 1898.
One, 592 pages, by U.S. Senator John J. Ingalls (Kansas) is entitled America’s War for Humanity “A Complete History of Cuba’s Struggle for Liberty and the Glorious Heroism of America’s Soldiers and Sailors”.
The second, which is the focus of this post, by Brig. General Charles King, is Decisive Battles of the World, and highlights, in its 956 pages, 52 “Decisive” battles in the history of Humanity. His “Decisive Battles” are listed at the end of this post.
Curious to me is why these books ended up on the farm of my Mom’s parents, which my grandparents established after migrating from southwest Wisconsin in 1905. I don’t know anyone on that ‘side’ of my family who was actually in the Spanish-American War.
More logically, they’d have ended up on the shelf of my other grandfather, Henry Bernard, some hundreds of miles away, who, seven years earlier, was in the Spanish-American War in the Philippines. It appears he was in the same unit commanded by author General King, and at the same places in the Philippines. But King’s book focuses on a battle in Cuba, and not the Philippines.
Ah, the unanswerable questions the very existence of these volumes on a North Dakota farm bring forth!
A more obvious “decisive battle” than the others is the last in King’s book – the 52nd. It is the battle for Santiago Cuba, including the famous story of the Charge up San Juan Hill, with the iconic Colonel Theodore Roosevelt (who in the book is one of four officers pictured, but is the only one in civilian clothes). The others: Major Generals H. W. Lawton and Adna B. Chaffee; and Brig. General Leonard Wood. The Spanish-American War was the war of the authors generation, and of his own participation. This last chapter is written by Henry F. Keenan. Keenan himself is an intriguing character. Why he writes this chapter is unknown. The first few pages are here: Santiago Decisive Battle001
Here’s the Battle for Santiago Map, as published in the book: (click to enlarge it). The invasion began at a place called Baiquiri (yes, the word Daiquiri is also mentioned in the book!)

Page 918 of Decisive Battles of the World by Brig Gen Charles H. King, U.S.A.


The 64 page chapter about Cuba is not quite the standard stuff of war histories written by the victors. The conquest of good (us) over evil (the Spaniards); the heroism and losses of especially the officers (though nothing is said about the schoolboy story I learned of the charge up San Juan Hill led by Teddy Roosevelt.) The natural elements – heat, water, terrain – seem more an “enemy” than the Spaniards, but, whatever….
The Spanish-American War was a triumph of public relations, begun by the mysterious sinking of the battleship Maine in Havana Harbor and nudged along by what came to be called “yellow journalism”. Then came the rush of volunteers to serve, including my grandfather Bernard in the Philippines (“remember the Maine“); and ending, as the author vividly states, “In nearly every one of the thousands of newspapers published throughout the United States, the participants and victims of the Santiago campaign contributed personal observation of the battle; the combined testimonies, if ever collated, would give definite account of every instant of time from the moment the armada left Tampa, until the flag of the republic was flung out over the civic palace of Santiago….”
All that changed over the 2500 years of warfare were the weapons of choice.
Here’s how the weapons of 1898 were described: Sp Am War weapons001
Decisive Battles skips the 20th century because the 20th Century had not yet begun.
War has continued, and the rules of war have only changed, including in Wisconsin, today, where the war is counted in Dollars spent on campaigns and management of misinformation and disinformation. Words have become the weapons. Last I heard, the Democrats are heavily out-gunned in at least the money war: 7 1/2 to one (though those numbers are themselves moving targets.)
Likely no one will physically die, at least directly of the election, but most definitely the intention is to Win, not Lose, a 21st century “Civil War” of a new kind….
But is a “win” in war “decisive”? Maybe, but only for the moment.
As General King had no way of knowing, Santiago turned out to not be “decisive” at all, at least for the peasantry who remained poor. Then someone named Fidel Castro took over Cuba in 1959…and now an American of Spanish Cuban descent, Florida U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, is being prominently mentioned as a possible Republican vice-presidential candidate in the U.S. presidential election…politics does make strange bedfellows.
But even in War, even the victors ultimately lose.

We can make the Rules of War less relevant in the political battles to come.
Brig-Gen. King’s notion of the 52 Decisive Battles of the World:
Marathon 490 BC
Thermopylae 480 BC
Plateau 479 BC
Leuctra 371 BC
Mantinea 362 BC
Arbela 331 BC
Cannae 215 BC
Zama 202 BC
Cynoscephal 197 BC
Manesia 190 BC
Pydna 168 BC
Pharsalia 49 BC
Philippi 42 BC
Chalons 451 AD
Tours 732 AD
Hastings 1066 AD
Jerusalem 1099 AD
Acre 1191 AD
Cressy 1346 AD
Orleans 1429 AD
Constantinople 1453 AD
Leipsic 1631 ad
Lutzen 1632 AD
Vienna 1683 AD
Narva 1700 AD
Pultowa 1709 AD
Blenheim 1794 AD
Ramilies 1706 AD
Gudenarde 1708 AD
Leuthen 1757 AD
Kunersdorf 1759 AD
Torgau 1760 AD
Bunker Hill 1775 AD
Saratoga 1777 AD
Marengo 1800 AD (first of five Napoleonic battles)
Austerlitz 1805 AD ” ”
Jena 1806 AD ” ”
Auerstadt 1806 AD ” ”
Waterloo 1815 AD ” ”
The Alamo 1836 AD (expanding United States)
Chapultepec 1847 AD ” ” ”
Balaclava 1854 AD (Europe)
Malvern Hill 1862 AD (first of five U. S. Civil War)
Manassas 1862 AD ” ”
Chancellorsville 1863 AD ” ”
Gettysburg 1863 AD ” ”
Nashville 1864 AD ” ”
Five Forks and Lee’s Surrender 1865 AD ” ”
Gravelotte 1879 AD
Plevna 1877 AD
Port Arthur 1894 AD
Santiago 1898 AD
By my counting, here are number of his decisive battles by time period:
13 – BC
2 – Pre-1000 AD
6 – 1000-1500 AD
13 – 1600-1800 AD (two American)
18 – 1800-1900 (five Napoleon, six Civil War, two against Mexico)
Directly related to this post: here.
For other political commentary, simply place the words Election 2012 in the search box and click.