Recollections: Jane

    Families!  Mine was (and still is) the most dysfunctional middle-class family in America!  I dare anyone to match their family’s dysfunction against mine.  Ground rules:  Your family has to be White, middle class, gainfully employed and have at least two kids.
     My parents lived in a two-bedroom house and still managed to not speak to each other for over ten years.  “Tell your father to pass the salt.”  The silent treatment perfected!  How the freak did they even do that?  My sister refused to sign my father’s burial consent unless we gave her all his money — even though she hadn’t spoken to my father for seven years.  No one told me when my sister died.  I had to read her obituary nine months later.
     My family managed to raise middle-class dysfunctionality to a fine art!

Updates from Jane, July 4: (1) Am currently in Baku [Azerbaijan].  Always a good idea to celebrate freedom — and I’m going to celebrate Independence Day by trying to gate-crash the U.S. embassy party in Azerbaijan. Probably only members of the Epstein Class will be invited but worth a try.  If you don’t hear from me in a week…call up Trump?

(2)     Just stopped by the US embassy to attend the July 4 celebration.  “We had it two days ago,” I was told.  And of course you can print anything I write.  Happy Independence Day!  Or not.

Recollections: Brian

Hello Dick!
Here’s my story:  I was 18 years old growing up in Texas.  I was too young to vote or to drink alcohol legally.  However my pastor (at our church), my government (LBJ) and my parents wanted me to go off to Vietnam to fight!
Fight?   Kill or be killed?   Scheiße!   I said “No way, José!”.   Instead I went off to Denmark to work with a bank there.  There were wild, wonderful women there.   So sweet.  I wasn’t in to sex but they were.   Well, instead of that we drank expensive beers, dear 🙂   I so loved it!I a
In my mind I’d left the USA forever.  But my Momma was smart.  She made a deal with the draft board.  If I came back to the USA, I would get a very high draft number, meaning I wouldn’t almost certainly  be drafter.  It worked great.
When I arrived in NYC I only had $7, so I had to ask my brother for a loan for $100.  Easy peasy.
I am a fence sitter.  LBJ was a Democrat.  I called then Democ-Rats, ha ha.  And I called the Republicans, Republi-CONS, ha ha.
But now I am so much happier.  Even with Trump for whom I pray for.  Oh, Jesus and Mary!  🙂
Love,
Brian
P.S.  Later I went to Vietnam to help my German friends there strengthen credit unions.  They could speak English but not French.  In Vietnam they speak French.   I so LOVED it there.  I rode a little motorbike all over, even up to the China border.  Fun!
It’s okay to publish 🙂

Recollections: Nancy

A classmate of mine from LaMoure has been writing short stories and sending them for me to read, and I didn’t know about them until today.  I will have lots of reading and deleting to do.   I am beginning those things today at the library where help is still within reach.
Yesterday was June 2, which was my grandfather’s 145th birthday.  He was born in Iowa in 1881.   His name was Charles Carl Paulson.   He was from a family of 12.   He worked on the railroad there and got married.   In about 1904 his brother Herman moved to Adrian, ND to farm.   He invited Charles to take the farm across the road from him, so Charles and his wife Marie packed their belongings and mules into a train and rode it to Adrian in LaMoure County.  Their third child, my mother Vivian was just a few months old when they arrived in Adrian in 1907.   Charles eventually quit farming and started selling cars and building roads.
In 1928 when my dad Albert Hurley entered the family by marrying Vivian, Charles taught him the ropes of road building.   Charles moved to LaMoure and got elected sheriff.   He and another man traded off as sheriff and treasurer for many years.   Yesterday our son Luke and his wife Johanna had a son they named Hunter Lucas Erickson.   I was glad the baby arrived on my grandpa’s birthday.


Dick, another few details of Grandpa Paulson.  As sheriff of LaMoure County, he would deputize his kids at times.  His sons Lester and Cleo were athletes whose football training served them well when chasing and tackling an offender running through the corn rows or whatever.  He’d deputize my mother or one of her sisters when he needed to drive a woman to the mental hospital in Jamestown.  He deputized my dad when he needed him to scare a man who claimed to be paralyzed into admitting he’d killed his sister at the farm where they lived.


My sisters were lucky when they were old enough to get their driver’s license that he said, “They’re good drivers” and they got to skip the written and driving tests.
My grandpa was such a leading citizen in LaMoure that his obituary rated the front page of the Chronicle when he died in 1952.   There is always more to my stories!   This time I will sign it Nancy Patricia Hurley Erickson

Recollections: Lois

One ancestor, Runyon C. Tunison, comes to mind as a person of interest.

  1. C. was the oldest of 6 children born to William and Elizabeth Fitz Randolph in 1817. Siblings were Tunis, Ira, John, Alexander, and Sarah E.  He died at age 72 + months per the obituary of Humboldt County IA (putting birth year in 1815 which agrees with enlistment in Civil War Iowa Regiment 31 as age 45).

Runyon married Margaret Breese in 1840, had son William, then Wallais and Ira C in New Jersey.  Margaret died in 1854 of heart failure and he married Elizabeth Chandler Turner, widow of Henry B, and they had two sons – Adelbert John and Willis Wesley …residing in Buffalo NY.

During his lifetime, Runyon lost siblings, a wife, and children – health and tragedy.

  1. Brothers: Ira was killed in Battle of Chapultepec, Alexander died of wounds two weeks after the battle in 1847.
  2. Son Wallais died in 1853 Congestion of brain
  3. Wife Margaret died in 1854 of heart failure
  4. Brother Tunis died in Buffalo in 1873
  5. Son Adelbert “Del” was murdered in Kansas in 1885

In 1880 Runyon was listed on census as a boarder, widowed, in Newark.  His son William was living in Union NJ.  He had divorced Elizabeth and by late 1880’s was living in a County Farm home likely for veterans in Humboldt County IA where his son Ira resided.  Runyon died in May of 1887.

A newspaper article in Rock Island IL in 1870 was titled “Misdeeds of R. C. Tunison” – it was about a scam when Runyon started a collection to provide funds for a man who was injured in a plow works factory, unable to work thereafter.  He recorded names and amounts donated for a time until someone became suspicious, contacted the injured man, and found out he (Mr. Cook) asked R. C. to stop collecting on his behalf.  Within days, “Tunison had eloped, gone – subscription paper and all with a report he had likely collected about $25.  He left a letter with the watchman on the Island bridge telling him to go to his shop and secure a few scraps and keep them, also bidding him good bye, as this place would see him no more”.  The closing line of the newspaper article:  Good bye, Tunison, thy charities covered a mighty mean specimen of morality”.

*********

Researching my ancestors has been fulfilling beyond belief. My grandmother Maggie Tunison’s line and her mother’s line of Hewitt provided 400 years of insight into the lives of my ancestors in America.

ADDITION FROM LOIS July 3:

The link with your ancestor’s origin and all the facts was very interesting.  A cousin published my mom’s side (German/Polish) in a book the size of an encyclopedia in 1996 almost 15 years before I started research on my paternal grandmother – cannot imagine the difficulty without the Internet and all the resources since then.  Lots of surprises on the “grandmother’s sides” like being related to Humphrey Bogart.      Thought of a few facts on my family and how after 185 more years we are “Midwesterners”.

My grandmother Maggie descended from English, French, and Dutch.  No records of marriage on two Great GM and 4X GGM has no clues.  From 1640 to 1840 my blood line of ancestors moved from Manhattan Island to Somerset County New Jersey.  Without the military land grant for service of Runyon’s brother in the war against Mexico, the move to Iowa most likely would not have occurred. Hmmmmm I wonder how Runyon and his family traveled from Buffalo NY to Waterloo IA.  Just noticed in the 1860 census it listed info on value of estate – Runyon had $25 which is about the amount he supposedly collected in his scam.

Recollections: Larry

My own father sent me away to be raised by an uncle and an aunt who had no children. After a year or so, they sent me to my grandmother in Valley City, North Dakota, a perfect village for a child to be raised in. But I did see my father, occasionally, over the years and I admired him for a number of reasons: his occupation as a railroad telegrapher, his carving of wooden horses, and his insatiable curiosity, which I thankfully inherited. He died at 60 and now I’m 83. Looking back, I understand him better but not completely. Having raised a son and daughter, I both understand yet am somewhat perplexed as to how he could send me away at age 5. But, I remain forever grateful because of where I landed and for the care I received from my grandmother. Happy Father’s Day, Dick. I enjoyed the photos which reminded me of my own “command central.” It’s a place in my life that has always been – now, more than ever – my personal refuge.

Recollections: Jim

I have an interesting, somewhat seminal story of my immigrant roots.  I had the foresight to gather assorted facts and information several decades ago when older relatives freely shared their stories. My father’s mother migrated from rural Norway and his father from Trelleborg the southern tip of Sweden near Copenhagen Denmark. I speak the languages and have visited their original neighborhoods, including historic cemeteries to gather a lot of interesting facts. Life was simple and yet some ways dreary.  Society was rigid with little mobility and few economic opportunities. The news of America was exciting and enticing for the adventurous young people.

My father’s mother Cecilia has a unique story. While very young she bore an out of wedlock child. Her future would be a predictable life with a poor farmer. She made a bold move to leave her baby in the care of her sister and seek passage to America. One way to have American sponsor pay her passage in return for 18 months of service as a domestic servant. My father’s father William had a different challenge. He was apprenticed as a steamfitter with little direct wage and found few opportunities to advance. I believe his family helped him pay for his long passage to Minnesota. He took a very low paying laborer job when he arrived in Minneapolis in 1906. My father’s parents met at a social gathering Dania Hall near the seven corners area in South Minneapolis. After a brief courtship they were married and continued to live in Minneapolis. As Minneapolis residences converted from coal to natural gas there was ample work and the family including my father and aunt thrived.

Later our family story had a heart-breaking challenge. My paternal grandfather, the breadwinner, developed a severe heart condition during the 1930’s and could not do heavy work. As a response, my father’s parents developed a novel solution. In the same South Minneapolis Scandinavian neighborhood, they found an empty underutilized building. They divided the building into 15 separate sleeping rooms and rented them to recent Scandinavian immigrants. Residents could obtain breakfast, a packed lunch and return at the end of the work day for a nutritious supper in a dining room with a radio and phonograph. My father and his lovely (accordion playing) sister grew up in the company of up to 15 adult males. Some of the most colorful family stories are remembered from this austere Boarding House era during the 1930’s.

My mother’s family name is Scanlon, almost pure Irish.   Immediately before living in Minneapolis, the Scanlon’s lived 40 miles south of Minneapolis in the small historic railroad towns Farmington and Elko where her father was Station Manager. Imagine my mother and her four siblings lived their childhood in a series of Railroad stations during my grandfather’s 50-year career for the Milwaukee Railroad.   My mother’s father Francis (nicknamed Pat) grew up in the small town of Adams, MN near Austin (famous for their Spam canned meat). James Scanlon, Francis’ father was born in Montreal Canada in August 1866. We know that James’s father was John Scanlon and his mother was named Jane. John was born County Wicklow and Jane in County Sligo in Ireland. They were married in 1848 in Ireland. The chief reason for the migration was The Great Potato Famine (a massive crop failure due to a fungal disease). While still a young man John migrated first to New York and served with the Union Army and fought in several Civil War battles including Gettysburg. After the war he migrated to southern Minnesota to participate in the rapidly expanding railroad industry and started a family of five children including my grandfather Francis.  My mother’s maternal grandmother Harriet was born in Vermont April 1865. I have names and relevant live dates of her grandparents’ parents that migrated there from England.

The eventful odyssey of   two families Nelson and Scanlon joined together in the late 1930’s.  The two families lived directly across the street from one another in South Minneapolis. My father was Walter Nelson and my mother Frances Scanlon, together was an old fashioned love story. They were married in 1940 and I was born in 1943.  My daughter, Kristin from my first marriage has Dutch ethnicity. Her grandparents immigrated to Minnesota in 1953. My current wife Nenita immigrated to Minnesota in 2012. Many of our social friends are immigrants from the Philippines, so we have an opportunity to explore and appreciate and preserve some of the beautiful and interesting details of each culture.

There are some common threads from my immigrant’s roots. The immigrant experience tends to highly value three human qualities. One is that all worthwhile achievements are the product of hard work. Second, our strong healthy family relationship are vital to our well-being. Third we should always be willing to lend a helping hand to those in need.

French Canada and the American Revolution

Please see note at end of post.

Today, July 1, is Dominion Day in Canada.  The link is to the Canadian Government descriptor of the day.

My father’s ancestry is 100% French-Canadian (mom was 100% German).

Remi Roy, one of my numerous French-Canadian cousins, and valued friend, recently provided a very interesting summary of the Quebec Act of 1774 which relates to the near-miss of Quebec becoming the 14th colony of the infant United States.  The map below, as well as the text of Remi’s summary of the history, follow.

Following Remi’s summary is another provided by my long-time friend Dr. Virgil Benoit, in November, 2010.

I have known both Remi and Virgil for many years,  and they are very well informed.  I’m privileged to know them.  Remi lives in Montreal and Virgil in Red Lake Falls MN area.  They are both retired professors.

Quebec and the to-be United States in 1774

Remi Roy’s summary:

Under the Quebec Act of 1774, the boundaries of the Province of Quebec were massively expanded—stretching south to the Ohio River and west all the way to the Mississippi River.

For a brief nine-year window until the Treaty of Paris in 1783, Quebec encompassed the entire “Old Northwest,” including modern-day Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and eastern Minnesota.

The Demographic Reality

If you had travelled through this newly expanded wilderness in 1774 and crossed paths with a non-Indigenous person, you could confidently assume they spoke French.

While the British map claimed this territory on paper, the ground reality was entirely different:

Indigenous Nations: The Dakota, Ojibwe, Miami, Shawnee, and Potawatomi held the vast majority of the physical landscape, trade paths, and hunting grounds.
French-Canadian Settlers: The small, permanent European population consisted almost entirely of French-Canadian habitants (farmers) and voyageurs (fur traders). They were concentrated in hubs like Detroit (1,400 residents), Vincennes, Kaskaskia, and Green Bay.
The British: The English language was largely confined to a few isolated military barracks.

Why Britain Kept it French

The British Parliament enacted this massive expansion out of pure pragmatism. They knew a few hundred British redcoats couldn’t possibly control millions of acres of wilderness if the local populations revolted.

By passing the Quebec Act, Britain achieved two major strategic goals:

1. Appease the French Majority: By guaranteeing the free practice of the Catholic faith and restoring traditional French civil law, Britain secured the loyalty of French fur traders and influential merchants.
2. Box in the Thirteen Colonies: It used a legally French-administered zone as a massive buffer to block rebellious Anglo-American colonists from expanding westward over the Appalachian Mountains.

This move absolutely infuriated the American colonists out east—who labeled it one of the “Intolerable Acts”—and helped spark the American Revolution just a year later.

The Modern Footprint

Because the western border of Quebec was anchored to the upper Mississippi River, the expansion traveled right through the modern St. Paul-Minneapolis metropolitan area, cutting off at St. Anthony Falls.

If you live in the Twin Cities metro today, this means that everything east of the Mississippi River was briefly part of Quebec. If you are standing in any of these modern counties, you are standing on what was technically French-administered, British-owned Canadian soil in 1774:

Ramsey County (including St. Paul)
Washington County (including Woodbury and Stillwater)
Anoka County
Sherburne County
St. Croix & Pierce Counties (just across the river in Wisconsin)

Here is Virgil Benoit’s summary written November, 2010, and used in my family French-Canadian family history in 2010: Quebec Act of 1774 per Virgil Benoit 2010 (2)


Remi added some additional commentary on June 30 2026 after I sent him Virgils commentary: “as you know, some of our ancestors in Bellechase [QC] were sympathetic to the American English colonists and even participated in the Revolutionary War against the British. Attached is something that I previously wrote about this.” 

THE ROLE OF FRENCH CANADIANS IN THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION

Most Canadiens remained neutral during the American Revolution. They saw it as a fratricidal fight between two English camps. In general, they wished for a pox on both houses of the English factions. Most saw the English colonists as liars. However, some Canadiens sided with the revolutionaries and participated in the Revolutionary War.

Recruited initially in Québec and later among Canadien refugees in the northern New York colony, the Second Canadian Regiment (also known as “Congress’s Own”) fought alongside English-speaking Americans against the British. Organized on a French-style four-battalion structure, these soldiers earned a reputation for exceptional discipline and combat performance at Staten Island, Brandywine, and Germantown. They called themselves les patriotes, sharing a deep-seated grievance against the British Crown with their English-speaking American allies. The patriotes hoped that, with French intervention, a revolutionary victory might eventually lead to France returning to govern Canada.

Most significantly, the Canadian Regiment played a vital role in the Siege of Yorktown. On September 24, 1781, Colonel Moses Hazen was given command of the Second Brigade in the Marquis de Lafayette’s Light Division—placing his Canadien soldiers directly under Lafayette’s command. They took part in the critical siege operations that ultimately forced the British surrender.

At Yorktown, where French forces outnumbered the revolutionaries, a fascinating linguistic dynamic existed. While the regular French Army arriving from Europe was composed of men from various provinces who spoke distinct regional dialects, the Canadien soldiers spoke a remarkably unified colonial French. Generationally removed from Europe, the Canadiens had developed a standardized speech that stood out even alongside their metropolitan French allies.

Because they had taken up arms against the British Crown, these men and their families became the United States’ earliest refugees, forced to flee French Canada during the Continental Army’s retreat from Canada in 1776. Unable to return home after the war, many eventually settled in the Refugee Tract of upstate New York, which was officially organized as Clinton County, with the Town of Champlain among its first settlements. It became the first “Little Canada” in the United States and served as a starting point for early French-Canadian migration into the American Midwest.

In the decades that followed, most French Canadians—who considered themselves American simply by virtue of the continent they shared, just as American as the residents of the United States—viewed the Americans of the young republic with a mix of wariness and admiration. This admiration for the republican values and democracy of their southern neighbours ran deep. In 1837, it even culminated in an armed rebellion in Lower Canada, where patriotes fought to overthrow British colonial rule and establish an independent, French-speaking republic explicitly modelled on the United States. In the decades following the failed rebellion, driven by both economic desperation and this enduring admiration, close to one million French Canadians— almost half the population of Quebec—immigrated to the United States and became proud US citizens.

In stark contrast to this affinity for the United States, French Canadians often looked down upon English Canadians—many of whom were descendants of the tens of thousands of United States Loyalists who had fled north—viewing them as Américains manqués: failed, second-class Americans who preferred the monarchy to democracy. In fact, by 1800, roughly 80% of English speakers in Canada were loyalist refugees from the new American Republic. This massive influx explains why the standard English-Canadian accent developed in ways virtually identical to that of many in the United States.

The language of the French Canadians was Canadian, American, and profoundly North American. It was the lingua franca of the Great Plains for 200 years. Although their ancestral roots lay on different shores, first the French and later the English-speaking pioneers were bound together by the shared physical reality of the wilderness. They endured the same climates, navigated the same landscapes, and experienced the same natural world. This lived experience forged a shared North American worldview and a sense of belonging that transcended linguistic divides. The demands of the frontier shaped both North American English and North American French, distancing them from their European origins. In this way, these two languages became more similar to one another in feeling and spirit than to the dialects of the Old World.

POSTNOTE: July 3 I’ll have some observations as an ordinary person about the first 250 years of our country.  I will be including a half dozen or so other comments from others.  I will likely post in early morning.

COMMENTS (more at end of post)

from Fred: I always enjoy looking at maps showing the spurious/dubious French claims re their “Province of Quebec.” Those “lands” were under control of Jolly King George III and his loyal minions in the nearly-created US of A.  As you will recall, Colonials invaded the so-called Canada several times and made legal claims to the land. Then the aptly named French and Indian War (we were fighting both the French and Indians, of course) and cleared things up.

response from Dick: The English settlement of what became the U.S. far exceeded the number of French who came to what is now Quebec.  These two, along with Spain, “sliced and diced” North America over the years.  We live with the results – even with all the present day chaos, North American generally is quite the place.

US History maps NatGeo

from SAK in England:

This is fascinating!

As pre-high school students we studied history & geography of course. Usually teachers “simplified” matters for us. Thus the European religious wars were Catholic vs Protestants (or reformation vs counter-reformation). One teacher however, may she rest in eternal peace, refused to simplify & respected our capacity for complexity & nuance. In fact she encouraged us to investigate & research beyond the prescribed academic syllabus. Thus we learnt that Catholic France sided with Protestant parts of Europe sometimes etc. However wars often have little to do with religion. During those school days I got a book called The Age of Progress (1789-1870) by Irene Collins because I was fascinated by the French revolution, Napoleon etc. Well the revolution was certainly not very religious at all – you will find articles etc on the dechristianisation of France in that period. Tens of thousands of priests were exiled, hundreds executed. Yet a paragraph in the book starts as follows:

“In the early days of the Revolution, Frenchmen imagined that wars were the sport of kings and that in the new era of popular sovereignty France would live in peace and brotherly love with her neighbours. In May 1790 the Constituent Assembly formally renounced all wars of conquest and declared that the French nation would never use its forces against the liberty of any people [remember how Trump railed against foreign wars!?]. By the winter of 1791, however, war had begun to appear necessary in defence of the Revolution. . . .  More agreed with Vergniaud when he argued, in January 1792, that France should attack the Emperor before he attacked her. . . . Brissot himself confidently believed that French armies would be welcomed by oppressed peoples of Europe. . . . he was attacked by Robespierre in a great debate in January 1792. French armies would receive no welcome in Europe, Robespierre said, for ‘no-one loves armed missionaries‘. Nor would liberty triumph at home, for war would strengthen the hands of the king and his ministers. “

Robespierre lost the argument & Europe went to war for more than 20 years . . .

These were post enlightenment times and in many places there was a quick rush to liberalise and an equally hasty dash to supress the liberal trend and revert to tradition & conservatism. I really enjoyed a book by a Swedish author Per Olov Enquist: The Visit of the Royal Physician which brings to life the events in the Danish court of Christian VII – that bubbly 1770s period. An “enlightened” German physician becomes the court’s doctor. The King is mentally challenged & the physician seizes the opportunity to dramatically change & liberalise Denmark in 16 months using what we now call “executive orders”! British King George III, mentioned by Fred’s comment on your piece, sends his very young daughter Caroline to become Christian VIII’s wife only the King is not “interested”. She has a liaison with the German physician. The counter reformist traditionalist faction composed of the King’s mother, some religious elements & other conservative politicians react violently quashing the reforms & executing the physician. Interestingly the author, although on the liberal side, does not deprive the conservatives of redeeming features, thus a priest actually cares for the physician & his soul etc. I think one of the points Enquist is making is that the very speed of reform made the violent reaction inevitable & total. The pendulum swings. Another point is the use of the body & sexual issues (the liaison) as political weapon. A third might be the unelected technocrats pushing change & the ensuing reaction. Finally the King is mentally weak & unstable. The question of who is in control then becomes who is whispering in the King’s ear. The executive then becomes more of a symbol around which factions manoeuvre. Do you think all this has resonance somewhere today!? Hmmm

Your piece also explains why the Quebecois speak French somewhat “differently” 😊. I am told that it harks back to an older spoken French just as the Spanish of Latin America bears resemblance to an older Spanish. I wonder if that is true.

Another thing I noticed is how fast things change in the US/North America. In 250 years so much has happened. And even now the technological advances & political developments are again scary! Celebrations are in order but so is the examination of history & the learning therefrom.

Many thanks & kind regards.