October 31, 2000 The Congressional Record

Halloween, Tuesday, October 31, 2000, we were in Washington D.C., and had hopes to visit the Capitol.  But it wasn’t prime time.  The 2000 Election was one week away, and the odds of seeing much was pretty low.  I called the office of our then-Congressman, Bill Luther, and discovered that there was a session of the House of Representatives that evening.  He would have tickets that we could pick up to visit the House and sit in the Gallery.

We picked up the tickets and at 7 p.m. joined a small group from some other places to see the goings on for perhaps an hour.  It was not impressive.  A Congressman was seemingly talking to a camera, C-Span,  about Ergonomics; two groups of legislators were in their separate corners, chatting about whatever.  Nobody seemed to be listening to the speaker.  A Congressman actually came up to the gallery and spoke briefly to us, basically apologizing for what we were witnessing below, which seemed dysfunctional.

On return home, I wrote Rep. Luther and asked him if we could get a copy of the Congressional Record for the day, and very soon it came in the mail.  The cover is above.  I have kept it for the last 24 years, and this week decided to take a closer look at it.  I’m glad I did.

I won’t bore you with the content of this single day report of the Congress (House and Senate) of the United States, but it was helpful to me to do a quick review of it.

The document is 165 pages, 58 for Senate and 92 for House.  (The other pages were Extensions added after the session adjourned, and a Daily Diary).

It didn’t take long, navigating this record of a single day in Congress, to understand that the effort to govern a nation of over 330,000,000 people (280 million in 2000) by an institution of 435 elected representatives is not an easy thing.

The OSHA/Ergonomics speech was found on maybe two pages beginning at H11670, starting at about 1900 hours (7 p.m.)  The evening session began at 6 p.m.  Assorted representatives went on the record about assorted things, witnessing to the assorted concerns of their constituents back home.

The Congressional Record is the official record.  Representatives have a month to correct or append to the record, before it becomes the official record of the day.

The session we observed included names of representatives, some of whom are still serving.  Every single one of them has to run for reelection every two years; their next stop would be back home to campaign.  District boundaries for the legislators we saw would change as a result of the 2000 census; they changed again after 2010 and 2020,

Back home the Sunday before the 2000 election, we voted.  For President, the candidates were George W. Bush and Al Gore.  This was the election not settled until Dec. 12 by the U.S. Supreme Court.  Key was approximately 500 vote win in Florida, among several million votes cast.  Al Gore conceded, though he would have had a substantial legal case to defend himself.  Life went on.

Next Tuesday, every Congressperson is again up for election.  Who we select to represent us in Congress and the Senate, and their equivalents at the state level, are as important as the President, and our state Governor.

*

The few minutes with that old Congressional Record was an opportunity to reflect on how complicated a country we are, and how marvelous it is that we function pretty well in such a diverse community.    Governing is extremely difficult.

In the last 24 hours I have probably seen about 100 people, most who I do not know, who in my tiny share of the universe probably have hundreds of priorities, most different from my own.

We live in an immense community (our state, country and world), where our individual wants often compete with others, and we need to share space with everyone else.  “We” is much more than “Me”, and that rabble on the House of Representatives floor on October 31, 2000, was simply demonstrating that, live.

In those 20 years I have seen a deterioration in even that imperfection I witnessed that Halloween night – where we’ve divided into tribes, where the game is more and more win versus lose.  It is not healthy.

There is much more to be said.  Let this suffice for now.

 

Larry Johnson on Election 2024

Larry Johnson is a longtime friend and peace activist,   I am sending this along with his permission.

Dear Friends and Family:

My heart surgery a couple years ago may have ended my 50,61,70, or 100 mile walks, but I still walk every day.  This is, however, the first year in as long as I can remember that I didn’t do many daily walks to knock on doors, encouraging people to vote, telling my story and listening to “yours”, especially if you think differently.  I also write every day, because it starts with the same letter as “walk”, though the “w” is silent.  So just consider this a knock on your door, and a trading of stories about doing the best we can together for our country.  These are just some of my reasons for why I will vote the way I do.
I’m a Veteran who grew up Eisenhower Republican.  I’m not one of the enormous number of current Republicans disagreeing with many Walz/Harris policies, but voting for them anyway. I’ve voted Democrat all my adult life because I’ve mostly worked with children living in poverty. Democrats tend more toward safety nets and a “leg up” to help young people graduate to a better life.  I’ve known too many who went to jail for shoplifting or smoking the wrong thing, then struggle to get even menial jobs because they are “criminals”.  They had no access to big money to play endlessly with legal loopholes. However, even if there were no other reason, my problem with the former President is the way he talks about people, especially Veterans.  I’ll ignore the current argument where John Kelly and 13 others who were there said Mr. Trump disparaged Veterans.  I’m talking about things I heard myself, like the way Mr. Trump spoke of John McCain, Republican Veteran who actively worked “across the aisle” to get important things done.  I’m also sad about the way Covid was handled.  When I was drafted in 1970, I was a medic who gave preventive shots to children and to fellow GIs.  In the military there was no choice, but choice back home should be based on accurate information.  I have friends and family who died after refusing covid shots because of the way the President trashed professionals advocating for them.  I’m also a retired teacher, dismayed with talk about disbanding the Department of Education.  I’ve seen nothing about an alternative plan for supporting caring, dedicated, educators who impart their designated subject matter along with teaching children to not bully or use abusive language.  It has been particularly troubling lately to think about those children seeing the former President talking about immigrants in a way so abusive it would not be tolerated in school?
Some of you I know how you’re thinking, because we’ve talked.  Some I don’t, and it’s none of my business unless you choose to say so.  I’m just saying some of what I think.  I know cost of living is a factor for many, and it is a fact that wages were higher under the Trump Presidency.  What doesn’t get said when that is touted is that 2.7 million people lost their jobs, so for them wages were non-existent.  Also Mr. Trump increased the national debt in 4 years twice as much as has happened in the last 4 years.  I think neither side should be spending over budget, as that becomes a hidden cost to all of us down the road.  Less is better than more, and I lean toward a system like when a Republican Congress and a Democratic President, Bill Clinton, balanced the budget.  Both sides were dissatisfied with some things, but together they did something significant for the economy.  However, perhaps the thing that concerns me most is the talk about jailing or otherwise punishing political opponents.  I’ve attached my latest SUN POST column, which some of you have seen.  I suppose it puts me in line for that kind of punishment, unconscionable in what we like to refer to as a “free country”.  Just one more reason I couldn’t even think of voting for Mr. Trump, even if everything else were perfect.
Your friend or family member, no matter what your political opinions,
Larry Johnson

The Ground Game

Today is 7 days to the 2024 Election.

It is also the 95th anniversary of the generally accepted first day of the Great Depression, October 29, 1929.  Letters from an American does about as good a job as possible summarizing that dark time in American history here.  The Great Depression ground on till almost the advent of America’s entry into WWII.  World War II brought full employment and lots of death and destruction to the entire world.  (There are various other dates of significance in late 1929, but the 29th was a day which was a major alarm.)

Not everybody suffered, but most of the damage was to ordinary folks like ourselves – our ancestors.

I do family history, and over the last 40+ years I’ve come to an unusually direct contact with how the Great Depression really impacted on my own ancestral family from North Dakota.  I only offer a few snips from a much longer and enduring history.

Harbingers of bad times began in the 1920s. “The Roaring Twenties” was a time of false prosperity.

Case in point: my Dad graduated from high school in 1927, and was planning to go to university in the fall.  Earlier in the same month of his graduation his father’s employer went out of business with no safety net for employees – his dad was chief engineer; and at almost exactly the same time, the bank holding all their savings also closed.  (I don’t think the two events were related, but the results were very difficult for them.)

The situation for my Mom’s parents was similar.

Grandpa Busch was a farmer with aspirations.  In 1928, he was one of the first members of the North Dakota Farmers Union, and immediately became a local activist.

In the junk at the farm after Uncle Vince died I found an old bank statements for an account opened in January, 1929.  There were only 14 checks actually written.  Here is the final one in the account.  The check design was an expression of optimism for the future.

In the 1920s Grandma and Grandpa bought some more acreage to expand their farm.  By the 1930’s they couldn’t pay the mortgage, and things got so bad that the family story is that Lucina, the oldest, a young teacher, saved the rest of the farm by at least paying taxes in the worst years.

There was lots more evidence of the hardship of the end of prosperity.  Back in the early 2000s I was musing with my Uncle Vince about a magnificent Cottonwood Tree on the east edge of their property, and he recalled the events of 1934, the year the tree was planted; in his memory, the worst year of the 30s.  He was 9 years old….  The story remains on line, and is worth your time, here.

Both of my families survived the Great Depression, but both were badly damaged and never fully recovered.  Every family has their own story.

One of many farm sayings I heard growing up comes to mind: “don’t count your chickens before they hatch”.

“The Ground Game” is each one of us, person to person.   There is a huge amount at stake on November 5.  The Centennial of Black Tuesday is in 2029.  How will reality look then?

 

Fascism 1945

ELECTION INFORMATION: Minnesota related; and National information.

Just this morning I learned of the Army Talk #64 referenced in the photo below.  The entire 8-page Fact Sheet is here: Fascism US Army 24 Mar 1945.  The source is Heather Cox Richardson, who summarizes the below here.  I would strongly recommend reading the entire eight page fact sheet.  It is very enlightening.

Putting Facism on the table at this time is extraordinarily timely and pertinent.  Our WWII adversaries were Fascist regimes.  WWII was extraordinarily deadly including for the people of Germany, Italy and Japan.

The Fact Sheet was for soldiers.  It was apparently the 64th in a series which began in 1943.  The Fact Sheet publication date was about a month before Hitler ended his life (at age 56, April 30 1945); and just before Germany surrendered (May 7, 1945).

Mussolini, 61 years old, was executed Apr 28, 1945.  Italy surrendered Sep 8, 1943.  Japan surrendered Sep 2, 1945.  Leader Tojo was hung Dec 23, 1948.  He was 63.  Hirohito, Emperor, was 44 at Wars end and not tried for crimes and died at 88.

For the U.S., Franklin Delano Roosevelt died of cerebral hemorrhage at age 63, April 12, 1945; and was replaced by newly inaugurated Vice-President Harry Truman, age 61.

The authors of the Fact Sheet, and the U.S. Army which published it in March, 1945, obviously had no idea whatsoever about 2024.  But they knew very well the environment of WWII and days preceding.  You will note in the booklet that they don’t come down hard on Russia or Communism or Stalin.  That is because Russia was an ally, and had itself been brutalized by Germany.  Russia and the U.S. were on the same side.

Today, people who know have sounded the alarm about the danger DJT promises if elected, and supported by Congress and Senate.  What Fact Sheet 64 enumerates about 1945 is the same as what we can envision after 2024 if the Fascist candidate is elected.

Be forewarned.

Comments welcome.  (I purposely include ages of the main actors above.  It is surprising to me that they were all roughy the same age as the current major candidates for office in the U.S.)

POSTNOTE: Recommendation – not related to this post, but thought some of you might be interested.  Saturday, we saw the new film Conclave. about the selection of the Pope.  It is based on a novel, thus fictional, but as a lifelong Catholic I could identify with most every wiggle in the plot.  It is food for thought.  There was a good house, and everybody was paying attention.  At least check it out.   Suggestion: don’t try to find out how it ends till you see it for yourself.  Novels aren’t real, but often are pretty reflective of reality.

COMMENTS (more at end):

from Molly: Dick, this is downright creepy/scary… arghh!

from Claude: Thanks, Dick. That attachment was so amazing that I shared it.

from Carole: Thank you.  Heather Cox Richardson’s Letter is my morning go-to.

from SAK: What a coincidence your email arrived as I was about to listen to [this] BBC adaptation.  It Can’t Happen Here  – “based on Sinclair Lewis’ prescient 1936 satirical novel . . .”  The picture on that page was taken during the “Pro-American Rally” held at Madison Square Garden, 1939.  Using a search engine one can find many more pictures from that event & that time . . .

from Lois: Hi Dick – the article on Fascism was interesting – down to earth.  It made me think about our democracy, lead to the Constitution and three rights – life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.   Thus, I pursued the meaning of the third and found this article in Emory U site.  Good read for me and hope for you.

from Flo: Where we live, fascism is too often most promoted! It’s sickening, at the very least!

from Kathy: Thanks Dick. I heard Heather discuss. Definition sure fits today for what Trump seems to have in mind.

from Brian, some more film from New York City:  Today we visited my niece Cally, and her brother, my nephew, Ben in NYC.  He was up from Austin, Texas, visiting her.   They had an arrangement to visit the United Nations building this afternoon.  We offered to drive them there, and since we were there I decided to fly Simple Mavie the drone by the fascinating UN building!  Here’s what the drone saw.

Re, the “Rally” at Madison Square Garden

Dick, Monday Oct. 28, 2024: The only portion of the Madison Square Garden “rally” I heard yesterday was a portion of Dr. Phil, on the TV downstairs, and that for only a short time (I didn’t watch any of it).  At the same time, my spouse was meeting with our 98 year old friend who grew up in Nazi Germany and was near 19 when the Nazis surrendered.  She has often recalled a 75 mile walk home, near starving, when she was finally released from her work.  Her father, who refused to become a Nazi Party member, had been drafted – he was a road engineer – and if I recall they had last seen him around Christmas 1944.  They believe he died somewhere in Russia, but this has never been confirmed.  Our friend came to the United States in 1947 to marry her Gentleman Soldier who had been one of those who liberated her town.  They were married 51 years.  He died in 1998.  I doubt that our friend watched the “rally”.  I gave her an enlarged copy of the Army Talk 64 and may see her later today.  Wednesday, Oct. 30:  our friend read the Army Talk 64 and totally agreed with it.  It precisely described Germany as she remembered it in growing up (WWII) years.

from Heather Cox Richardson, here.

from Joyce Vance, here.

from Just Above Sunset, here.

the Weekly Sift, here.

NEW: Heather Cox Richardson Letters from an American October 30, 2024

NEW: Joyce Vance Civil Discourse October 31, 2024

10 Days

 ELECTION INFORMATION: Minnesota related; and National information.

Related Post: Fascism 1945, here.

This is my final paragraph, my final thought, before sending this post October 26, 2024.  Our nation, the United States, has survived 237 years of sometimes very messy democracy – a nation which has embraced diversity in all of its forms, and a rule of law, embracing the secret ballot.  We are on the precipice of throwing it all away to what amounts to a dictatorship which will force conformity and result ultimately in anarchy.   The solution – the future – lies with each one of us, now: the right to vote.  E Pluribus Unum.  Out of many, one.

There’s not much more to say:  where I stand.  I’m proud to be a Democrat and voted October 14.  My opinion: at this time in history, there is no “Republican Party” worthy of the name.  Anyone who is running for office who carried the myth of a stolen election in 2020 does not deserve a single vote in 2024.  MAGA has been and is a destructive force, anti-democracy and freedom.

Nov. 5 will be the “family photo” of the United States of America – all of us, especially who we choose as as leaders at all levels.  We all have a single vote.

Why should I care enough to bother to vote?  Personally, Nov. 5  I’ll be halfway through my 85th year.  Under the best of circumstances, my trip is near over.  But my vote won’t be about me.  My vote is for those who’ll be left behind.

It was a personal wake-up call to learn that Kamala Harris is younger than my first child; as is Tim Walz.  (The three are all 60, a normal age for political figures now and before.)

Five days after Nov. 5, my youngest grandkid turns 18 .   They, and everyone after them, also have to deal with the results of Nov. 5.  The youngest is not old enough to vote Nov. 5.

This year especially, kids of any age, whether they vote or not, informed or not, are voting about their future. (When I was 18, voting age was 21. Todays kids have a privilege I didn’t have at their age.)

My advice is simple: before you vote, know why you’re voting for the persons you choose for every office.  If you haven’t already voted, VOTE as if your future – and not only yours – depends on it.

There is a stark choice this November 5: a government for all the people; or a government for one person and the tiny sliver of the population who already have far too much, and want still more….

*

Lately, the words Hitler and Fascism have officially entered the conversation.  I looked up the word Fascist in my blog word search, and I think this may be a post you may want to read, the one from July 19, 2016, (Republican National Convention) written eight years ago, before the 2016 election.  (Hitler died at his own hand shortly after his 56th birthday, and right before Germany surrendered, essentially destroyed by WWII.  His 1,000 year Reich dream lasted less than a dozen years.)

*

There is much left to say.  Next posts will likely be posted about the time the first polls close on the evening of Nov. 5, and morning of Nov. 6.  Check back. Have a great day.

*

Side topic: Brian sends along a fascinating four minute view over part of Manhattan and Brooklyn.  No politics, but just a fun piece of Drone view of the city.  Here it is.  Enjoy.  Thanks, Brian.

*

PERSONAL POSTNOTE: After I had finished this post, I saw two troubling pieces of data.  This morning one correspondent sent a notice including a group photo of a bunch of international leaders which included, best I could count, 36 people.  I responded: “Unless I miss something, 34 are men, all but two are white, 1 seems to be Arab.  How many are autocrats?  How many truly respect democracy?”  The group, BRICS,  included people like Putin….

Later, came a piece of data on the upcoming election, which indicated that only 36% of white men would likely vote for Harris/Walz.  This was only data from somewhere.   But it seems consistent with other data.  Nothing was noted about the other 64%.

White men – my gender and color – are definitely an issue, most likely largely because they’ve always had the power, and think they are entitled to it, even if they aren’t.  Played out, their’s is a smug, stupid, mindset.

At the same time, what puzzles me is that the alternative to Kamala Harris et al is very likely the most flawed human being ever to be nominated for the office of President by either major party.  He has multiple indictments, convictions, could never be a reliable witness because he has no boundary between truth and lies, flourishes with cultivating fear and loathing and retribution, and has spent four years sowing chaos.  On and on and on.  He will be a disaster for all of us if elected, especially for his internal enemies which probably even include people like me.

The old saying applies: Caveat Emptor.  Let the buyer beware.

Vote now or Nov. 5.

POSTNOTE 2 5:20 A.M. Oct. 24:  Take the time to read this from Heather Cox Richardson, just received..

COMMENTS (more at end of post): 

from Molly:  Thanks, Dick, for another fine post.

Yup, I voted this week at my library, enjoyed 45 minutes standing & chatting in the sunshine with mostly other seniors.
And, admit to being utterly terrified regarding these way-too-close poll numbers… (being a news junkie is NOT a good thing at this time!!!😵‍💫.)


from SAK:  Thanks Mr Bernard, a good summing up of the present situation (not to say predicament!) & a call to vote.

Although the original long essay, The Paranoid Style in American Politics by Dr Richard Hofstadter, was written in the mid 60s & this review is 8 years old, I found it increasingly relevant.

A few extracts:

‘While a minority of the population will always be attracted to such rhetoric, the paranoid style as a mass phenomenon is episodic. What causes these waves? Hofstadter attributes them to “social conflicts that involve ultimate schemes of values and that bring fundamental fears and hatreds, rather than negotiable interests, into political action” [108]. At such moments, there is no possibility of compromise, negotiation, and reconciliation. Unable to legislate their absolutist principles, the paranoid spokesmen feel confirmed in their belief that the entire political process is a sham.’

‘Unlike earlier movements that used the paranoid style, the modern right, he notes, “feels dispossessed: America has been largely taken away from them and their kind, though they are determined to try to repossess it and to prevent the final destructive act of subversion” [109]. The anti-Catholic agitator of the nineteenth century sought to defend his homeland from Jesuit spies and foreign intrigue. The modern right-winger, on the other hand, sees within his own country  “a conspiracy so vast”  as to extend into every facet of society, including the highest circles of government, mass media, and the military.’

‘And, once again, as in The Age of Reform, he sought to expose the irrational and antidemocratic underpinnings of present-day social values and their spokesmen. The paranoid style – characterized by a suspicious and hostile regard for one’s opponents, and an emotion-driven disregard for facts – tinged the language of many fringe groups throughout the nation’s history; now, the spokesman of a major political party relied on it. The paranoid style therefore posed a grave threat to democracy.’

‘The pseudoconservative, he writes, “feels himself to be in a world in which he is spied upon, plotted against, betrayed, and very likely destined for total ruin” [110]. He is, for the most part, a proponent of very limited government, except where it comes to cracking down on Communism [in the present instance replace that with “immigration”, “wokery” etc] within the nation’s borders, and he defines his values in almost total opposition to the main currents of American society.’

‘His contention that “in a populistic culture like ours, …it is at least conceivable that a highly organized, vocal, active, and well-financed minority could create a political climate in which the rational pursuit of our well-being and safety would become impossible” not only strikes us as deeply relevant today, but to him it implied that, contrary to what he had thought as a younger historian, it was necessary to maintain shared values and to defend a liberal consensus that was weaker than he had once believed [117].’

Dick in response: I suppose there’s logic in there somewhere, but I have a hard time understanding how declaring people like myself as an enemy is helpful when they need all the friends they can get.  I have been noticing very few T signs this year.  A friend across the river sent a picture of an immense one recently; earlier today at a freeway bridge across the river was a platoon of T warriors with lots of flags.  Lots of traffic, no horns I heard in support, which I found odd.  I agree there’s lots of oratorical passion, still, but not much to back it up.  We shall see.  (On the D side, we don’t do as much of this kind of thing – more understated and probably more person to person.  Again, just anecdotal.)

Gaza and Wild Robot

This afternoon was a truly exceptional one for me.

At noon, daughter Heather and I went to an uplifting kids film, The Wild Robot, at a local theater.

When I came home I spent an hour and a half watching the new and searing Frontline Special on the first year after October 7, 2023.  The program had been released before Yahya Sinwar had been killed in Gaza,

I had planned neither activity.  I could not have planned better.  I recommend both.

The Wild Robot is brand new, and about the highest rated children’s film I’ve come across.  It deserves its ratings.  It opened September 27, 102 minutes.  It grabbed me, and didn’t let go.  If you wonder what it’s about, just check out the web.  I didn’t know anything about it till I saw it in person.  Heather and I go to movies once in awhile – always kid movies.  It’s been my observation for a long while that most of these films have a subtext of moral messaging for both kids and their adult companions.  This was certainly one of these.

Gaza, “A Year of War: Israelis and Palestinians“, also debuted on September 24,  The Frontline film is extraordinary, 84 minutes, viewable on your computer.

Both presentations caused me much personal introspection.  They are occasion to looking at oneself in the matter of solution.  What neither the Palestinians nor the Israelis and the Middle East generally need is perpetual war, which will be the result if some durable peace cannot be achieved.  Win and Lose is a losing formula for all sides.

Take a look, and take the time.  I’ll say no more.

POSTNOTE: In my October 3 post I mentioned the status of my friend, Michael, who lives on a barrier island in the Clearwater FL area.  He had evacuated before the storm, and wrote afterwards that there had been serious damage on his island.  Oct. 20 I received a followup e-mail from him reporting on the current status.  The following is forwarded with his permission:

I have mostly recovered from the hurricanes and have returned to my US Peace Memorial Foundation work.
 
Living on a barrier island in the Gulf of Mexico, where water temperatures continue to rise, involves risks and rewards. This time, we were hit hard.
 
My condo unit is mostly livable as I wait for repairs. Many of the owners weren’t so fortunate. In the ten buildings on the island, most first-floor units were destroyed by a sea surge, and many higher apartments lost their windows and suffered similar destruction of their interiors. Mounds of storm debris are everywhere as people empty their condos. Many carports, including mine, were destroyed, and sea-swept cars are everywhere. Well over 100 vehicles were covered with salt water. It will take a long time to recover from Hurricanes Helene and Milton.
Peace and good health,

To my knowledge, Michael’s specific area got no publicity at all in the time of Helene.  That, of course, is true of most people affected by such storms.  It is a good reminder to pay attention to these situations, and to the many persons who suffer the consequences.  It could be you or I, next time….

LOOKING AHEAD: Likely there will be one or two additional posts before Election Day, but no more about the election itself.  Check back once in awhile.  I also did a post after the annual Education Minnesota Teachers Conference last Thursday.  You can read it here.

 

 

 

Teach

January 18, 2025, is the 25th anniversary of my retirement from Education Minnesota.  61 years ago, I started teaching school.  Today I spent part of the morning at the annual “MEA” teacher’s conference at River Centre in St. Paul.  It is an event that attracts me each year, and each year the people around me look younger, and it demonstrates change in other ways.  On the other hand, there is a bit of nostalgia harkening back to my years on the job.

This morning, I arrived in time for the keynote talk by Dr. Micia Mosely (above).  Dr. Mosely, nursing a broken foot, talked to a ballroom packed with classroom teachers.  Her talk was stimulating.  Her organization is the black teachers project, part of the national equity project.

(There is a 12 minute video at the Black Teacher’s Project which gives a very worthwhile introduction, well worth your time.)

I had a particular flashback moment during her presentation when she talked a bit about her background, and as parr of that showed the 5th grade class of which she was a part at PS 205 in New York City, 1983-84, and how the teacher of that class made a small but very profound difference in her life in 5th grade.  The teacher, Ms Arden(?), is in the below picture with that class.  Were she still alive, I highly doubt Ms Arden would remember the incident that so positively impacted on young Micia.  That’s how it goes.  As the saying goes, “Little things mean a lot”.

The picture was striking to me because not too long ago a retired 5th grade teacher friend showed me an almost identical photo of another 5th grade class in the twin cities in 2002-03.

Every conference I go to I consider a success if there is a single insight I pick up.  Usually there are more,  This conference was no exception.

I probably went to my first MEA teacher’s convention in 1965, which is nearing 60 years ago, when I was 25.  Obviously, yesterday I was in a crowd of “youngsters”, probably not much different than we were, then.

Dr. Mosely had us pair up a couple of times to briefly discuss two questions.  My new friend was Michael, probably in his 30s.  The first question “what is the why for the work that you do?“.  In the back and forth he shared that he was born in El Salvador; I from North Dakota.  I asked when he came to the U.S.: “when I was 5”, he said.

The impression made on me by Michael, by Dr. Mosely, and the gathered educators, was pretty profound.

We all start out as kids, impacted in infinite sorts of ways in every year of our existence, growing through crises, and good times, and ordinary times, developing outlooks and skills in infinite ways.

The school community, regardless of where you are, is a place of infinite variety, populated by human beings – students, teachers, all manner of associates as lunchroom cooks, custodians, bus drivers, administrators, and of course, parents and families of all manner.

School is where kids learn to be parts of a community beyond their own homes.

And every class has a Micia Mosley, possibly many more than one, in all of the rich variations of humanity…and this may not manifest for many years.

Those school employees I saw today at MEA in St. Paul are heroes and I thank them.

 

 

Three weeks: Personal Thoughts About the Upcoming Presidential Election

I very rarely ask potential visitors to this blog to read on.  This is one of the rare exception to this self-imposed rule. Take the time, whether you agree or not. Directly related recent posts: Judicial Candidates; Watching Citizen Obama.  ELECTION INFORMATION: Minnesota related; and National information.  My position on 2024 election, here.  

*

Saturday I was at an informal conversation of a dozen people, ranging in age from myself, to a Freshman in high school, including two local legislators.  We spent about 1 1/2 hours together, and I jotted down the topics that came up – by my count, there were 11.  I didn’t know most of the group.  We were all Democrats.  The conversation reminded me of how complex the issues and citizens are, and how important it is that our leaders and ourselves recognize the importance of being a community.  A community moving towards win-win for all is better than a community where for one to win, someone else has to lose. In this middle day of October, 2024, we are a divided country.  My opinion: particularly this year, the Democratic Party has the best sense of community, an easy choice this year.  I invite you to read on.  If you haven’t seen them, PBS Frontline has had two recent one hour programs worth watching.  Harris/Trump; Vance/Walz.  Equal time is given to each.  I’ve watched them both.

Three weeks from today is Election Day.  Personally, I voted yesterday.  I would have voted earlier, but had some unresolved questions about a couple of non-Presidential issues on my ballot.  Since this post crosses lots of boundaries – states, etc – I’ll comment solely on U.S. President.  As every year, in 2024 I’ve been actively involved in the political process.  On Election Day, I’m an alternate election judge – available on call if needed.  Elections are the life-blood of a free society.  I pay attention.

My very strong preference in 2024 for President/Vice President are Kamala Harris and Tim Walz.  This is not a close call.  I’m lucky to have one photo I took of them together, in Minneapolis in late October, 2022,  VP Harris was in town to support the reelection of Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, the other person in the picture.

Tim Walz and Kamala Harris in support of Lt Gov candidate Peggy Flanagan, Minneapolis October 16, 2022.

Kamala Harris is possibly the most qualified candidate for President we’ve ever had, with career long record of public service.

Tim Walz is my Governor.  I’ve met him in person only once, in 2006, when he was making his first run for Congress.  Eight times he has stood for election in Minnesota, and eight times he has won, the last two for Governor of my state – a state that works.

I almost pity the opposition research folks who have to try to cast Tim Walz in a negative light.  Sure, they try, but not successfully.  He’d be a very worthy successor if needed.  I tend to think of him similarly to Harry Truman, who had to assume the Presidency 3 months into his term as Vice-President in 1945, near the end of WWII and later had to manage the Korean Conflict.  Truman was a rural kid too, and when the chips were down, he performed.  In my Oct 1 blog about Tim Walz I said this about our state: Minnesota is a state that works, and a lot of that is due to community minded leadership of Governor Walz and a strong and effective Democratic Party (DFL).  The word “community” is my key word.  By no means, does this mean that all is perfect here.  No place is perfect.  But Minnesotans work well together, and there is a very strong sense of community.  We experience this in person every day.

The Presidency is not a place for rigidity.  Look no further than Hurricanes Helene and Milton to see the reality facing any person who gets the job.

Like many, I watched Joe Biden’s disappointing performance in the June 27 debate.   I’m 2 1/2 years older than Biden, so I have a bit of perspective about age.  It became clear that this single bad night might be fatal to Biden’s candidacy, On July 8, I wrote to the five people I thought would most likely be in the communication loop to make successor decisions if needed (one of the five was Gov. Walz).   I said this:  “I remain a strong supporter of Biden/Harris.  If the decision is made to change course, I think it is time for the Democrats to consider actively a “Team of Rivals” approach which was apparently Abraham Lincoln’s strategy to deal with division.

On July 21, President Biden left the race, and asked his vice-president Kamala Harris to run.  Later she picked Gov. Walz as her running mate.  The rest is history.  Did I have anything to do with this and later decisions?  I doubt it, but I also believe that every single one of us when given the opportunity should be willing to step onto the court. with, at least, our own opinion.

I have also taken the position that the old Republican Party no longer exists, even though there might be a “Republican” label on the ballot.  MAGA is not Republican.  I maintain that anyone at any level on any ballot who played the election denial card at any time after the 2020 election does not deserve a single vote in 2024.  Along with President, who we select as our Congress, state legislature and state constitutional officers have huge implications.

Project 2025 has oft been referenced in past weeks.  It is not a theoretical threat from the MAGA fringe.  At the very least, check it out.  There are many internet references: take your pick.  I have described it as a nuclear weapon, armed to destroy democracy if implemented.

I have labeled my party, the Democratic Party, as the party of WE; the MAGA bunch, the party of ME.  At this time in history there is a great qualitative difference.  The WE side tends toward inclusive, community, tolerant, looking forward; the ME side tends to individual orientation, power and control, fear and loathing, looking backward….  Partly it plays out in the tendency I see in my party, to squabble about this and that – a healthy democracy accepts argument; while the MAGA bunch seems more the “shut up and do what you’re told” contingent.  In the WE side ‘freedom’ is for all of us; on the ME, it is for the winner.  There are still many moderate Republicans, but they have basically been banished from their party and I hope they take back the label in the future.  Liz Cheney and others represent this significant faction.  I think they know this is necessary.

I have often used this illustration I did in the late 1980s.  I have hi-lited three places on the illustration:  far left, the far right and myself.  The extremes tend to get the “news”, and are essentially mirror images of each other.  Political Scrum 2024

The demonizing of Immigrants of all sorts troubles me deeply, not only because all of my ancestry are immigrants to this country from somewhere else..  I see no problem whatever in reasonable controls, and I think there is consensus over many years that immigration reform is desirable.  In fact, this was nearly achieved this year, but  never saw the light of day for a vote.

The deadliest problem we have to deal with as we go forward is the torrent of dishonesty we have had to endure especially in the last eight years.  Very recently one of my long-time friends sent a post she had seen on Facebook which catches the wave better than any other essay I have seen.  Here it is in pdf format: Terra Vance Walz Dishonesty Oct 2024,  The author is a West Virginian,  Terra Vance, which is her Facebook name.

The commentary is long but well worth your reading time.  At Facebook, it has hundreds of comments.  I share it as a pdf since many folks are not on Facebook.  The focus of Ms Vance’s commentary is Tim Walz, who she admits she doesn’t know.  Do check it out.

What will happen November 5?  All anyone  can control is their own vote: including whether or not they vote, or how.  I have no more or no less power than you, or anyone else among the approximately 250,000,000 who are eligible to vote Nov. 5.  Join me.

COMMENTS (also at end of post):

from Fred: This was a particularly appropriate piece and very well done. Your quotation is excellent. “I have labeled my party, the Democratic Party, as the party of WE; the MAGA bunch, the party of ME.  At this time in history there is a great qualitative difference.”

The decline and eventual annexation of the Republican Party is to be greatly lamented. Although often disagreeing with them, I respected their choice of leaders and candidates. It seems like a long shot now, but I hope the true GOP can be revived.  In the words of the immortal GOP mediocrity and grammarian, President Warren G. Harding, we need “a return to normalcy.”

from Mary: Someone once asked me to make a pithy comment about some initiative I was involved in….I did not know what pithy was at the time but learned and have come to realize your blog is truly pithy!  ‘Good on you,matey!!’


from Brian: I love your post, thanks so much!!   

 
For instance you say:  “A community moving towards win-win for all is better than a community where for one to win, someone else has to lose. In this middle day of October, 2024, we are a divided country.”
 
I so agree.  My saying is “Divide and conquer; or, hang together or hang separately.”     We are, thank goodness, “E pluribus unum”, From many, one”
 
Changing the topic slightly, since I work a lot with Native Americans, as you know, I like this Cher song:
Me, too, I’m a half breed–part Irish, a little Black, French and German.   And Texan, ha ha, that’s where I grew up.  Fun place!

 

Watching Citizen Obama

Thursday, Oct 10, I watched President Barack Obama speak in Pittsburgh PA in Kamala Harris’ campaign for President.

The Presidents message was interesting.  But I found myself finding a different kind of context for the President, which I’d like to share at. this point in history.

Two days later, Saturday, I was in a Democrat conversation group, and two at the table were Freshman and Junior in High School.  In introducing myself, I commented that when I was a senior in high school (1957-58) Sputnik was launched (Oct. 4).  That was 67 years ago:  that’s ancient history, even for a number of adults at the table.  We have to place ourself in context with others…and it isn’t easy, or an option.  Those high school kids, neither old enough to vote in November, are the ones who will bear the long-term effects of this years election.  People like myself won’t be as affected….  But our choice is a very real part of the inheritance we leave behind.

*

Nov. 5, 2024, if I’m still alive (I have no personal plans for departing) I will be almost exactly mid-way in my 85th year on the planet (my medical chart would say “84”, but when you’re born, you’re in your first year, etc). Whatever….

I got to thinking about Presidents and Vice-Presidents I have actually seen in person at some point in my life; how I saw them; where I was at in my own life at the time.  And out of that first impression, some thinking about what they accomplished, their dilemmas, etc.

The list turned out to be surprisingly long, and I won’t go into much detail.  But to the point of origin of this little essay:

I first saw Barack Obama in person a few days before the Minnesota precinct caucuses in February, 2008.  I was in a packed house at the Target Center in downtown Minneapolis, and he was there to make his pitch (at caucus I marked my preference for Hillary Clinton).  Mr. Obama was very impressive.  I simply thought Hillary had more relevant experience at the time.

photos Dick Bernard Jan 19, 2008

You know the results. Later Hillary became Secretary of State in the Obama administration. They made an excellent team.

When I saw Barack in 2008, I was 67 years old; he was 47.  I saw him one more time during his presidency – at the University of Minnesota – but for this essay that’s irrelevant.

When I saw President Obama on television a couple of days ago, he was a youthful looking 63, veteran of eight years as President of the United States; whose Vice-President for those eight years was the current President, Joe Biden.  In those 16 years, President Obama has become an honored elder, with accompanying wisdom, and it showed in both his performance and in his reception.

He paid his dues.

His wife, Michelle, First Lady, I saw in person one time, at Macalester College in St. Paul in October, 2008, before the election.  She was 44 at the time.  She was introduced by the daughter of close friends of mine.  I can remember her request to the students in attendance: “cell phones up!”.  She was an immensely impressive woman, and it showed later.

The U.S. is a better place for their having served and continuing to serve.  The past impacts the present, and the future, for good or ill.

*

Without going into much detail, here are a few other personal examples.  What are yours.

Dwight Eisenhower was 62 and new President of the United States in 1953 when I saw him in an open car in a motorcade in Minot ND.  I was 13.  I think he was assessing the new Air Force Base at Minot, and the coming missile silos in the Cold War.  But I was just witnessing the event as a kid.  He was famed as Supreme Allied Commander in Europe in WWII.  The war ended when he was 54.

Nelson Rockefeller was 52 when I saw him in Valley City ND in 1960.  He was vying for nomination for President that summer. Richard Nixon won the nomination, and John F. Kennedy won the election.  Rockefeller had several terms as Governor of New York, and later was Vice President(1975-77) in Gerald Ford’s presidency.

I first saw Jimmy Carter in October, 1978, in Minneapolis.  He was President, and 54 years of age.  (He recently turned 100.)  I recall that his visit was protested, I believe related to the then-proposed Boundary Waters Canoe Area, and an additional issue relating to Iranians protesting the Shah of Iran.

Gerald Ford was President when I saw him in Bloomington MN in 1976.  He was 63.

Al Gore, then vice-president, was running for President when I saw him in Eagan MN in 2000.  He was 52.

I first saw Kamala Harris in person as vice-president in 2022.  She was 57.

Tim Walz was running for his first term in office in 2006 when I saw him at a fundraiser.  He was 41.

There are others I could add, but let these suffice.  I had hoped to see George W Bush at least in motorcade, but he escaped us all, both supporters and opponents.  This was about 2006.

Granted, all of these are just sightings.  But such sightings do have an impact.

I particularly note at how young these government officials were.  I also note that they were all men, except for Kamala Harris.

Judicial Candidates

ELECTION INFORMATION: Minnesota related; and National information.  My position on 2024 election, here.

The specifics of this post apply to Minnesota, but you may find this useful wherever you live.  Executive summary: I will vote for all incumbents on the judicial portion of the Nov. 5 ballot.  If you wish, more below.

On my election ballot for Nov. 5, are 23 Judicial elections.  This is not unusual and consistent with Minnesota Law.

(There are about 300 Judges in Minnesota, divided among 10 Judicial Districts.  All positions are non-partisan and have terms; most run unopposed.  Opposition is allowed.  Distinguished career Supreme Court Judge Alan Page was elected under the system.)

Occasionally there are clearly unqualified candidates.  They are exposed in the old fashioned way: networks of information: the word gets around.

The Minnesota House of Representatives has a very interesting guide to the Minnesota Judiciary, here.  Start with page five of this guide.  Page 10 talks about term and election of judges.

Personally, I haven’t voted yet, and a short while ago came an informative newspaper column (Here is the D. J. Tice column in  the Minnesota Star Tribune.) which in turn caused me to refer to the website of the Minnesota State Bar Association (MSBA) which has a process for at least informally assessing Judicial candidates on the ballot.

Here is the MSBA website, for your election information: the Minnesota State Bar Association poll is a very useful link assessing  the candidates in contested judicial elections.

Mostly, the 23  on my ballot are unopposed and thus do not have to campaign.  In essence, their performance record is their campaign.  In two Supreme Court and one Appellate Court seat, there are two candidates.  And one Judge in my Judicial District (#10) has a competitor.  In each case, the Bar Association poll of members gives the nod to the incumbents.

So, in my case, I will vote for all of the incumbents listed, even if I’ve never heard of most of them, based on faith in the system of justice in this state.

*

Some personal comments on the judicial system follow.  I write as an ordinary non-lawyer citizen whose work career involved a lot of work with, against and around lawyers.

PERSONAL COMMENTS:

Like the vast majority of citizens, my direct contact with “The Law” as an individual has thankfully been rare and low-end, like parking tickets.  At the same time, I know lots of people and lots of circumstances, and while I do spend most of my time within my own town, the odds someone I know encountering the Law somewhere else in this country, is at least as high as encountering it here.  And when you encounter the Law, wherever you might be, you are hoping that your rights will be respected wherever you are.

While this post is about state jurisprudence, a short while ago, a reader of this blog – a Canadian – wrote as follows about U.S.jurisprudence: “I find it very strange that in the U.S., judges are either elected or appointed by senators. In my view, this politicization undermines the principle of the separation of powers. Recently, Mexico also decided to elect judges, which many argue signals a serious threat to democracy. I don’t see how a Democrat can receive a fair trial if a Republican prosecutor campaigns on promises to lock up the “enemy”—and the same holds true in reverse.

My correspondent was commenting on the increasing threat of using the Law politically to punish political opponents.  This is no longer an abstract possibility.  It is an active threat.

Like all systems, anywhere, Minnesota’s is imperfect, and perfection is probably not attainable.  On the other hand, while the existing system seems to work pretty well, with a legal system that respects the rights of the accused and seems generally to have escaped much serious controversy over the years, there is room for improvement.

Like most everyone, I can identify ideas for reform, but that is unproductive here.  We can and should work for systemic change through the appropriate channels.

Any Law is open to interpretation, which means lawyers are needed to argue, and judges to rule, and appeal processes to review and if need be, revise. The system itself presumes imperfection.   The dynamic changes if the Law becomes a partisan cudgel; where the objective is to control the legislative process – what the Law is – and who interprets what the Law means – the Court.

An independent judiciary with the right to appeal is crucial.  Of course, there are inequities here as well.  The rich can afford more justice than the poor, one can say.  The color of one’s skin, or the language one speaks, also factor. .

I think most all of us can identify with some “there but for the grace of god go I” situation.  Personally, it is easy to come up with examples within my own sphere.  So can anyone else.

What Tice and my Canadian friend did, for me, was to cause me to pay a bit more attention to the reality in which we all live.

The U.S. Supreme Court is the most recent and most glaring example of boundary issues.  If you’ve read this sentence you know what I am suggesting is a present day reality.

What worries me even more than the partisan angle, is the religious one – where ‘religious belief’ intrudes on and overrides fact.  My own church leadership (Catholic) has its “nose in the tent”, challenging separation of church and state, falsely claiming its members right to religious freedom to control other persons beliefs is somehow being abridged (the ‘life’ and anti-women’s rights narrative).

A recent example (among many) is now happening in Oklahoma, where public schools were required by state directive to have a particular Bible (aka the so-called “Trump Bible”, King James, with Constitution, leather-like cover, etc.), as official part of the requirement.  As I write, the directive  has been softened, but still requiring the King James Version, which is the Protestant version.

How do Oklahoma Catholics react?   There are plenty of them in Oklahoma.  .

Keeping the partisan ‘camel’ out of the court ‘tent’ to the greatest extent possible is a good thing, in my opinion.  And it is citizens like ourselves who can assure this continues.

POSTNOTE: My Canadian friends take on the matter:  In Canada, the notion of “weaponizing the judiciary” is unheard of, as the judicial system is viewed as impartial and largely insulated from political influence. Unlike the U.S., where the Supreme Court has increasingly been drawn into partisan conflicts, Canada’s Supreme Court has maintained a reputation for independence. Judicial appointments in Canada follow a more transparent and non-partisan process, with justices chosen based on merit rather than ideological allegiance. In Canada, judicial integrity is fiercely protected, and while criticisms of rulings do occur, the judiciary is rarely, if ever, seen as a tool for advancing political agendas.

You might find this article insightful as it delves into these differences.

In some states, private Catholic schools are subsidized by the state. Some conservative Catholics want to turn the US into a theocracy, like some evangelists.

I like the Minnesota trifecta.

POSTNOTE 2:  I’ve always appreciated a 52 page booklet published by the American Bar Association in the late 1950s in connection of Law Day by President Eisenhower.  The booklet is presented in four separate links. Law Day Am Bar Assoc 1959; Law Day (2) Am Bar Assoc 1959; Law Day (3) Am Bar Assoc 1959; Law Day (4) Am Bar Assoc 1959